“The issue I have with this is I don’t understand how you can say that puck is completely crossing the goal line. There’s no official behind the net there.”
The Hockey Central Panel discusses the Game 4 OT winner in Anaheim
Getty
The Edmonton Oilers now find themselves on the brink of elimination after a controversial goal proved to be correct.
The Edmonton Oilers find themselves on the brink of elimination following a 4-3 defeat on Sunday night in Game 4 of their opening-round series against the Anaheim Ducks in the 2026 Stanley Cup playoffs.
The game marked a remarkable comeback by the Ducks, capped by a controversial goal in overtime.
Ryan Poeling officially scored at the 2:29-mark of the extra frame. However, the goal met a flurry of on-ice issues, leading to a complex review. The initial call of no-goal on the ice became a goal, with the video review upholding the call.
Here’s a look at the entire sequence:
CHAOS IN ANAHEIM‼️
• There was NO initial call on the ice when the play was live• The officials discussed, RULED IT A GOAL on the ice• THEN there was a video review, NO video angle shows the puck completely across the goal line• Situation room confirms a GOOD GOAL… pic.twitter.com/2KqkZRl4dg
— Gino Hard (@GinoHard_) April 27, 2026
The replay shows that the puck did indeed go inside the net. However, the rule, much to the Oilers’ chagrin, states that the entire puck must cross the goal line. This angle shows the best possible angle to make such a determination:
As insider Elliotte Friedman stated in Monday’s edition of the 32 Thoughts Podcast, his discussion with the situation room officials determined that there was no conclusive evidence to overturn the on-ice call.
The call was the right one. It doesn’t take much imagination to see that the puck had clearly crossed the line, even if Tristan Jarry’s skate obscured the view. Overturning the on-ice call would have raised more questions about the situation room’s legitimacy.
As a result, the Ducks got the goal, and the Oilers now face a 3-1 series deficit. The goal set the Honda Center ablaze, leaving dejected Edmonton fans to figure out what went wrong for their beloved team.
Following the game, the Sportsnet Oilers broadcast panel discussed the situation on the ice. While there’s little doubt the good-goal call was the right one, the panel questioned the on-ice officials’ ability to actually rule that it was a good goal.
As Friedman pointed out, there was no official behind the net. As such, seeing the puck completely cross the goal line from another angle would have been extremely challenging.
“The issue I have with this is I don’t understand how you can say that puck is completely crossing the goal line. There’s no official behind the net there.”
The Hockey Central Panel discusses the Game 4 OT winner in Anaheim
The rationale seems to point towards one of the NHL’s tenets: There has to be conclusive evidence to overturn an on-ice call. That was the case in the Ducks-Oilers Game 4 matchup, putting an end to a thrilling showdown.
What to read next:
The broader issue following the Oilers’ defeat lies in Edmonton’s existential threat this season. With the series now 3-1 in favor of the Ducks, the Oilers face the prospect of a painful first-round exit.
Such an exit would be a devastating outcome for a team that many viewed as a potential Stanley Cup contender. For the most part in Game 4, it looked like the Oilers would even the series.
However, the club gave up a late goal to send the game to overtime. There, the Ducks’ resilience made it hard for the Oilers to keep up. Jarry, who entered the series in place of “starter” Connor Ingram, played a good game but just couldn’t hold on to steal the game for Edmonton.
Nestor Quixtan Seasoned NHL and NFL analyst and baseball writer focused on covering clubs across each league with news, analysis, and insights. Originally from Toronto, Canada, Nestor's singular experiences and background have enabled him to bring a different take on the sports world as a whole. Nestor's fondness for baseball, football, and hockey set the tone for his love and passion for writing about sports. More about Nestor Quixtan
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。