惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
H
Help Net Security
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
P
Proofpoint News Feed
A
About on SuperTechFans
V
V2EX
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
I
InfoQ
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
腾讯CDC
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
B
Blog RSS Feed
U
Unit 42
The Cloudflare Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog

dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.92rc2 Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix arguments order for chaos subdomain check Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch: block-file/allow-file - for review/feedback Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch: block-file/allow-file - for review/feedback Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch: block-file/allow-file - for review/feedback Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch: block-file/allow-file - for review/feedback [Dnsmasq-discuss] patch: block-file/allow-file - for review/feedback Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] server= with interface parameter changes behavior over time [Dnsmasq-discuss] NFTsets and hosts-files [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Allow expired RRSIGs when stale caching is enabled [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix local host records being overridden by upstream NXDOMAIN [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix arguments order for chaos subdomain check Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Malformed RRSIG Can Crash dnsmasq [Dnsmasq-discuss] Malformed NSEC/NSEC3 Can Hang dnsmasq [Dnsmasq-discuss] Malformed RRSIG Can Crash dnsmasq [Dnsmasq-discuss] Security - IMPORTANT Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Issue with circuit-id matching on dhcp requests Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Issue with circuit-id matching on dhcp requests Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Issue with circuit-id matching on dhcp requests [Dnsmasq-discuss] Issue with circuit-id matching on dhcp requests Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] bpf.c: fix memory leak in arp_enumerate() on BSD Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] bpf.c: fix memory leak in arp_enumerate() on BSD Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnssec problem here and now Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnssec problem here and now [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnssec problem here and now Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] server= with interface parameter changes behavior over time Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] bpf.c: fix memory leak in arp_enumerate() on BSD Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] bpf.c: fix memory leak in arp_enumerate() on BSD Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Preserve existing log file permissions when adding group-write bit. [Dnsmasq-discuss] server= with interface parameter changes behavior over time
[Dnsmasq-discuss] client using bootp request gets address...
Alec Habig · 2026-06-12 · via dnsmasq-discuss
Hi folks,

Been using dnsmasq for years, thank you!  First time I have a question
that I haven't been able to figure out from the docs.

I have a client trying to boot like so:

# tshark -Y "eth.addr == 08:00:30:4c:58:47"
Capturing on 'eno8303' 
 1205 9.134265135 10.204.88.71 → 255.255.255.255 BOOTP 342 Boot Request from 
08:00:30:4c:58:47 (NetworkR_4c:58:47)

I haven't been able to get an otherwise perfectly functional dnsmasq
instance to respond.

However, ISC dhcpd works: responds, gives an address, the client moves
on and is happy.  The client is not asking for tftp info, it's just
using bootp for getting an address.  Thus, if I understand things
correctly, listing a "dhcp-host" for dnsmasq should work, where
"dhcp-boot" is for tftp info?

My initial solution of confining dhcpd to one NIC where the troublesome
client lives (and is about to be joined by 89 similar ones) and letting
dnsmasq continue to run the rest of the cluster doesn't work, as both
daemons insist on binding to 0.0.0.0:67 regardless of config file scope.

Replacing dnsmasq with the set of individual {dhcpd, dns, tftp} daemons
would work but would be a PITA: I'm using dnsmasq for a reason.

So: suggestions for figuring out how to make dnsmasq pay attention to
this bootp request?  Is there debugging info I could turn on to
understand why it's ignoring the broadcast?  At this point I'm not above
recompiling things with a really specific "if" statement :)

           thanks,
           Alec

PS: alma9.8 running dnsmasq 2.85-18.el9_8.1 and dhcp-server 4.4.2-20.b1.el9
if that matters, but I suspect this is a more general question.

-- 
                               Alec Habig
                     University of Minnesota Duluth
                     Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
                             [email protected]
                   http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss