惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

量子位
D
Docker
月光博客
月光博客
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
美团技术团队
博客园 - 叶小钗
I
InfoQ
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 司徒正美
雷峰网
雷峰网
B
Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
腾讯CDC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
V
V2EX
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium

Fortune | FORTUNE

One man can kill Bill Ackman’s $64 billion bid for Universal Music Group—and no one knows what he’ll do | Fortune Poppi’s cofounder pitched her startup on Shark Tank while 9 months pregnant and landed a $400,000 deal—now it's worth $2 billion | Fortune Teen boys are choosing AI girlfriends over real ones for 'maximum control, zero rejection'—experts say it could make them unemployable | Fortune A United American merger is by no means impossible given the president 'loves big deals' | Fortune Reed Hastings’s planned exit from $455 billion Netflix ‘had nothing to do with’ the failed deal for Warner Bros., says Ted Sarandos | Fortune Meet Joe McCann: The high-flying crypto trader held in Tanzania after sudden death of his influencer fiancée Ashly Robinson | Fortune Gen Z is carving a different path in the housing market by doing it alone | Fortune U.S. Catholic leaders criticize Trump for ‘disparaging words’ about the pope as Vatican clash risks alienating Catholic voters | Fortune China has ‘nearly erased’ America’s lead in AI—and the flow of tech experts moving to the U.S. is slowing to a trickle, Stanford report says | Fortune Self-made millionaire behind $5 billion Skims Emma Grede says it all began with a cold call to Kris Jenner: Emma Grede—the self-made millionaire behind the $5 billion Skims empire—says it all began with an audacious cold call to Kris Jenner: ‘The difference between me and someone else is, I made it happen’ | Fortune Americans have never been this gloomy about the economy. Wall Street has never cashed in harder | Fortune ‘The college grading system [is] almost meaningless’: People see the Ivy League as an easy A and with flawed admissions standards | Fortune The CEO of $8.5 billion Japanese car giant Nissan plays the drums in a band and hits the tennis courts to destress from the top job | Fortune New York governor's take on a millionaires tax: fancy pied-à-terre second apartments worth over $5 million | Fortune Pope Leo XIV: A ‘handful of tyrants’ are ravaging earth with war and exploitation | Fortune Trump has no plan to cut the $39 trillion national debt, but he does want to cut childcare. His budget director is scrambling to clarify | Fortune China's economy grows 5% in first quarter, surprising economists to the upside | Fortune Everyone was wondering what Trump wanted more: Warsh smoothly seated at the Fed, or for Powell to pay. We have our answer | Fortune Palantir exec: the biggest mistake retailers are making with AI? Trying to do it all with one agent | Fortune American YouTuber who calls himself a 'troll' sentenced to 6 months in Korean prison for literally dancing on wartime graves | Fortune BBC plans to cut up to 2,000 jobs to save 10% of annual budget | Fortune Canva debuts a new suite of agentic tools, as the design app quietly becomes one of the world’s most used AI services | Fortune Moody's CEO: AI has a trust problem – better models won’t fix it | Fortune Top New York surgeon: Americans have better data for choosing restaurants than surgeons. That has to change | Fortune The Iran war’s fertilizer shock is hammering American farmers, and 70% can’t afford what they need for this year’s growing season | Fortune Education experts to Mamdani: Why are you foisting AI on our kids? | Fortune This CEO pirated video games as a teen and became a hacker for the Air Force. Now he’s built a $3 billion cyber firm | Fortune Teacher, blame thyself: Yale report savages Ivy League schools for destroying American trust in higher education | Fortune Fed chair nominee Kevin Warsh is worth more than $100 million and has stakes in SpaceX and Polymarket | Fortune From wool sneakers to GPUs: Allbirds’ desperate AI pivot and 600% stock surge, explained | Fortune
Former Comptroller: the cost of living has risen 106% sin...
Gene Ludwig · 2026-05-06 · via Fortune | FORTUNE

Over the past year, the word “affordability” has worked its way into nearly every conversation where the economy is the topic. Anyone tasked with balancing a household budget may very well say, “It’s about time.”

In recent months—and, in truth, for more than two decades—Americans have heard a familiar economic story: the economy grows, inflation rises and falls, wages adjust, and over time living standards improve. This narrative, reliably recycled by politicians seeking reelection and economists insulated from everyday pressures, obscures a more complicated reality.

But for many households, the lived experience has felt very different. Life has gradually become harder to afford—not suddenly, but steadily. Much like the proverbial frong on the stove in a pot of water, by the time the temperature reaches boiling point, it’s too late. 

The reason for this disconnect lies in how the economy is measured. Over the years, legacy economic statistics have lulled us into a false sense of security, while lived realities tell a different story. New data from the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP) bring that long-term trend into sharper focus.

Between 2001 and 2024, the cost of maintaining a basic standard of living in the United States, measured by LISEP’s True Living Cost (TLC) Index, has risen 106%. The cost of achieving a Minimal Quality of Life (MQL)—one that allows not just survival but stability and modest opportunity—has risen 108%. Over the same period, the government’s primary measure of inflation, the Consumer Price Index, rose 77%.

That difference may sound technical, but in practice, it represents the widening gap between how the economy is often described and how it is actually experienced.

So why the discrepancy? The answer is fairly straightforward. Traditional inflation measures track price changes across tens of thousands of goods and services, from televisions to airline tickets. But the finances of working families are dominated by a much smaller set of unavoidable costs: housing, healthcare, food, transportation, childcare, and basic household necessities.

Those are the categories the TLC tracks—the expenses families cannot easily avoid and that determine whether a household can maintain basic stability.

The MQL goes further. It incorporates the costs required not just to get by but to modestly participate in modern American life: saving for education, modest leisure, and the basic investments that allow families to move ahead rather than merely tread water.

When viewed through that lens, the economic story of the past two decades looks very different. The cost of essentials has increased at a rate of 3.2% per year, outpacing the 2.5% rate for overall consumer prices.

Housing alone has become dramatically more expensive, especially for renters. Between 2001 and 2024, shelter costs increased from 23% to 29% of total spending for the average renter, while remaining stable at 18% for homeowners. In 2024 alone, housing costs within the TLC rose 10.6%, one of the largest annual increases in more than two decades. Childcare rose 7.7%, the largest increase on record.

Even as headline inflation cooled, these essential costs continued to strain household budgets. When officials declare victory over inflation, they are measuring the rate of increase—not the accumulated price levels that families already cannot afford.

These increases are not isolated events. They are part of a long-term pattern in which the most unavoidable household costs rise faster than overall inflation.

Even in 2024, when inflation cooled relative to previous years, these costs continued to outpace wage growth. Median weekly earnings for full-time workers rose 3.9%, while both the TLC and MQL increased 4.4%, resulting in a modest but meaningful erosion of purchasing power.

Over time, small annual gaps like these compound into something much larger. Since 2001, the median full-time worker’s earnings have declined 5.5% after adjusting for the TLC. According to the latest LISEP data, the cost of achieving a minimal quality of life in 2024 was about $47,100 for a single adult and $121,100 for a family of four.

Those figures represent something important: the cost not merely of survival but of living with basic economic security in modern America. For many families, that threshold has moved steadily further away.

The American economy has produced extraordinary growth and innovation since 2001. Yet the cost of participating in that economy—of maintaining stability and building opportunity—has risen even faster for many households.

Understanding that reality is not about pessimism, ; it’s about measurement.

The more accurately we understand the long-term pressures facing American families, the better positioned we will be to design policies that support both economic growth and broad prosperity. After all, as Adam Smith observed more than two centuries ago, no society can truly flourish if most of its people struggle to afford the basic necessities of life.

That is precisely why how we measure the economy matters. Policymakers rely on economic data to guide decisions about employment, taxes, social programs, and the broader direction of economic policy—a gap between the economic story Americans hear and the one they live inevitably breeds frustration. Understanding the real cost pressures facing households is therefore not merely a statistical exercise—it is a prerequisite for rebuilding confidence in our economic institutions.

The newly released 2024 data simply reinforce a lesson that has been building for more than two decades: For many Americans, the challenge is not whether the economy is growing, but whether everyday life within that economy remains affordable for them.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.