Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words.

Each weekday morning, I leave home in central Tin Shui Wai, take the light rail to the MTR station, and then ride the Tuen Ma line towards the city. By the time the train reaches Nam Cheong, I would have spent close to 40 minutes pressed shoulder to shoulder with my fellow commuters, bracing for the cross‑harbour crawl to Hong Kong Island.

We are not just commuters. We are living indicators of a lopsided city, now pinning its hopes on a new railway line to correct years of spatial neglect.

The Northern Link, signed into construction in 2025 and due for completion by 2034, is often discussed in terms of tracks and land premiums. That misses the point. This is one of Hong Kong’s most consequential exercises in urban re‑engineering since the era of the new towns. Whether it corrects spatial imbalance or reinforces it will depend not on engineering, but on political choices shaped by financial arrangements.

At its core, the Northern Link is more than a transport project. The Railway Development Strategy 2000 identified the need for a rail link connecting the northwestern New Territories with the East Rail, yet action was repeatedly deferred. When the West Rail finally opened in 2003, it relied heavily on the “rail plus property” model. The result was the creation of a northwestern region (Yuen Long and Tuen Mun) that houses roughly 16 per cent of Hong Kong’s population but offers far fewer jobs, locking residents into long daily commutes southwards.

The Northern Link must not follow the same logic. In April, the MTR Corporation issued a record HK$18.8 billion (US$2.4 billion) of green bonds. Financial confidence, however, must be matched by public confidence that fare‑payers and taxpayers are not underwriting a project driven primarily by property returns rather than social outcomes.