惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
P
Proofpoint News Feed
D
Docker
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
B
Blog RSS Feed
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
小众软件
小众软件
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
IT之家
IT之家
H
Help Net Security
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
B
Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net

South China Morning Post

Singapore drama sparks Malaysian ire over scam hub depiction Time to act on stalled proposal toughening child abuse penalties, lawmakers say ‘Eager to explore’: Chinese migrants return to Venezuela after Maduro’s capture ‘We have no trust in the other side’: Iran blames US as talks end with no deal Opinion | Why securing Hong Kong’s economic future is a cultural question Hong Kong’s ministerial team spent HK$46.6 million on visits in past 3 years China family creates AI clone to comfort elderly mum after only son dies in crash Canada Olympic star Williams plans on ‘having a ‘blast’ at Hong Kong Sevens Singapore’s robotaxi drive revs up with help from Chinese AV leaders Editorial | Making Hong Kong desirable to overseas students must be a priority All 7 are dentists and hot. The Asian-American family blowing up social media Editorial | Ageing Hong Kong should welcome more open conversations around death My Take | Discovery Bay will never be the same if the restriction on taxi access is lifted Medical intern suspended after complaint over patient data in social media post Fish and vegetarianism major flashpoints in India’s West Bengal election Chinese crystal ‘paves way’ for GPS-free thorium clock navigation SCMP Best Bets: Endued can show his quality at Sha Tin Russia and Ukraine begin 32-hour ceasefire for Orthodox Easter Israeli spy firm Black Cube involved in Cyprus corruption probe ‘A big deal’: military drills show Tokyo’s growing focus on deterring China China targets middlemen in renewed crackdown on ‘hidden’ corruption Hong Kong-born gymnast leading quest to turn Singapore into elite hub Thais celebrate new year despite fuel price shocks delaying travel Harry Bentley tees up two good chances in Smart Golf and Elite Golf at Sha Tin Is this Kenyan rail project a model for Chinese and Western firms in Africa? Unearthing peace: ancient China gravesite reveals significance of broken weapons Meet Queen Elizabeth’s youngest grandchild, James, who was at Easter service Turtle found dead after apparent fall in Hong Kong’s Wong Tai Sin Landlords of 5,557 subdivided homes seek 3-year grace period to fix flats Trump critique pauses UK handover of Chagos Islands to Mauritius
Legal Tales | Where do office supplies belong? Here’s a h...
Martin W H Wong · 2026-06-18 · via South China Morning Post

I seldom, if ever, assume people in general do a particular thing, unless, of course, I do it too. But if it is a criminal act, then I assume in general that nobody would do it.

There is a peculiarity, it seems, with taking office supplies home, like a pen, or a soda, or a coffee capsule. Apparently, some people think it is no big deal, or even that there is nothing wrong with it. Some go so far as to assume everybody does it – maybe because they do it too?

Both lines of thinking are wrong, but it is perhaps more wrong to think that there is nothing wrong. You might think these supplies are simply there for everyone to take, that they are just “freebies”.

The starting point is, however, that they are the property of your employer and are not yours. For you to legitimately take them, you need your employer’s consent, and the precise extent of this consent is key: when these supplies are left around the office for everyone to take, your employer is consenting only to staff taking them for use at work. If you take them home or for your own benefit, then the consent no longer covers the taking.

You might defend yourself by saying, “I didn’t know, I thought they were just free for me to take.” But good luck persuading anyone to believe that, because any reasonable person will know that office supplies are meant for office use – there is literally the word “office” in the name.

It is therefore a crime of theft: you took property belonging to another without valid consent, and you could not have genuinely believed that you had the consent or right to do so. In the eyes of the law, you have committed an offence of dishonesty, different only in degree to stealing a million dollars from your employer’s bank account.