Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words.

The Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore reaffirmed a major shift in the Indo-Pacific’s security calculus. The core message from Washington was direct and strategically consequential: America is not retreating from the region, but it is no longer prepared to carry Asia’s security burden almost alone.

This marks the end of the old protection model, where many regional states benefited from the US deterrence umbrella while contributing limited military weight of their own. Pete Hegseth’s comment that Washington wants “partners, not protectorates” reflects adjustment, not abandonment. The US remains committed, but that commitment will now be more conditional, reciprocal and capability-driven.

Asia remains central to the future balance of power. Despite pressures in Europe, the Middle East and the western hemisphere, Washington still sees the Indo-Pacific as the decisive theatre of long-term strategic competition.

Deterrence must now be built through deterrence by denial: preventing any power from achieving quick military success in the “first island chain”, the South China Sea or other strategic zones. In practical terms, this means more distributed deployments, stronger access arrangements, resilient bases, deeper logistics networks, maritime domain awareness, integrated joint operations and faster crisis response. The strategic signal is clear: the US will not allow a single power to dominate Asia’s maritime order.

Allies and partners will increasingly be judged by capability, readiness and burden-sharing, not sentiment. A tiered partnership model is emerging, with priority given to states that invest more, integrate more and contribute more. Japan, South Korea and the Philippines are already moving in this direction. For many Southeast Asian states, however, the implications are more difficult, especially for those still trapped in cautious hedging while remaining underinvested in defence capacity.