惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
爱范儿
爱范儿
D
DataBreaches.Net
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
S
Secure Thoughts
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 【当耐特】
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 叶小钗
P
Proofpoint News Feed
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
T
ThreatConnect
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
T
Threatpost
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - Franky
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Project Zero
Project Zero
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
罗磊的独立博客
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
腾讯CDC
F
Future of Privacy Forum
F
Full Disclosure
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
J
Java Code Geeks
李成银的技术随笔
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
H
Hacker News: Front Page
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园_首页
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
美团技术团队
Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com

CSS-Tricks

Revealing Text With CSS letter-spacing | CSS-Tricks Technical Writing in the AI Age | CSS-Tricks Cross-Document View Transitions: Scaling Across Hundreds of Elements | CSS-Tricks Cross-Document View Transitions: Scaling Across Hundreds of Elements | CSS-Tricks The State of CSS Centering in 2026 | CSS-Tricks Stack Overflow: When We Stop Asking | CSS-Tricks Cross-Document View Transitions: The Gotchas Nobody Mentions | CSS-Tricks What’s !important #11: 3D Voxel Scenes, Flying Focus, CSS Syntaxes, and More | CSS-Tricks Computing and Displaying Discounted Prices in CSS | CSS-Tricks rotateX() | CSS-Tricks rotateY() | CSS-Tricks rotateZ() | CSS-Tricks rotate() | CSS-Tricks Soon We Can Finally Banish JavaScript to the ShadowRealm | CSS-Tricks Using CSS corner-shape For Folded Corners | CSS-Tricks A Scrollytelling Gift for Mum on Mother’s Day 2026 | CSS-Tricks Google’s Prompt API | CSS-Tricks Making Zigzag CSS Layouts With a Grid + Transform Trick | CSS-Tricks Fixed-Height Cards: More Fragile Than They Look | CSS-Tricks What’s !important #10: HTML-in-Canvas, Hex Maps, E-ink Optimization, and More | CSS-Tricks The Importance of Native Randomness in CSS | CSS-Tricks contrast() | CSS-Tricks contrast-color() | CSS-Tricks Let’s Use the Nonexistent ::nth-letter Selector Now | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #126 Recreating Apple’s Vision Pro Animation in CSS | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #125 Enhancing Astro With a Markdown Component | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #124 Markdown + Astro = ❤️ | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #123 What’s !important #9: clip-path Jigsaws, View Transitions Toolkit, Name-only Containers, and More | CSS-Tricks A Well-Designed JavaScript Module System is Your First Architecture Decision | CSS-Tricks hypot() | CSS-Tricks The Radio State Machine | CSS-Tricks 7 View Transitions Recipes to Try | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #122 Quick Hit #121 Selecting a Date Range in CSS | CSS-Tricks saturate() | CSS-Tricks justify-self | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #120 Alternatives to the !important Keyword | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #119 New CSS Multi-Column Layout Features in Chrome | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #118 Making Complex CSS Shapes Using shape() | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #117 Front-End Fools: Top 10 April Fools’ UI Pranks of All Time | CSS-Tricks Sniffing Out the CSS Olfactive API | CSS-Tricks What’s !important #8: Light/Dark Favicons, @mixin, object-view-box, and More | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #116 Form Automation Tips for Happier User and Clients | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #115 Generative UI Notes | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #114 Quick Hit #113 Experimenting With Scroll-Driven corner-shape Animations | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #112 JavaScript for Everyone: Destructuring | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #111 Quick Hit #110 What’s !important #7: random(), Folded Corners, Anchored Container Queries, and More | CSS-Tricks 4 Reasons That Make Tailwind Great for Building Layouts | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #109 Quick Hit #108 Abusing Customizable Selects | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #107 The Value of z-index | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #106 The Different Ways to Select <html> in CSS Quick Hit #105 Popover API or Dialog API: Which to Choose? Quick Hit #104 What’s !important #6: :heading, border-shape, Truncating Text From the Middle, and More Yet Another Way to Center an (Absolute) Element An Exploit ... in CSS?! Quick Hit #103 A Complete Guide to Bookmarklets Quick Hit #102 Loading Smarter: SVG vs. Raster Loaders in Modern Web Design Potentially Coming to a Browser :near() You Quick Hit #101 Distinguishing "Components" and "Utilities" in Tailwind Quick Hit #100 Spiral Scrollytelling in CSS With sibling-index() Interop 2026 Quick Hit #99 What’s !important #5: Lazy-loading iframes, Repeating corner-shape Backgrounds, and More Quick Hit #98 Making a Responsive Pyramidal Grid With Modern CSS Approximating contrast-color() With Other CSS Features Quick Hit #97 Trying to Make the Perfect Pie Chart in CSS Quick Hit #96 Quick Hit #95 CSS Bar Charts Using Modern Functions Quick Hit #94 No Hassle Visual Code Theming: Publishing an Extension Quick Hit #93
Using Formik to Handle Forms in React
CSS-Tricks · 2020-04-28 · via CSS-Tricks

There is no doubt that web forms play an integral role in our web site or applications. By default, they provide a useful set of elements and features — from legends and fieldsets to native validation and states — but they only get us so far when we start to consider the peculiarities of using them. For example, how can we manipulate the state of a form? How about different forms of validation? Even hooking a form up to post submissions is a daunting effort at times.

Component-driven front-end libraries, like React, can ease the task of wiring web forms but can also get verbose and redundant. That’s why I want to introduce you to Formik, a small library that solves the three most annoying parts of writing forms in React:

  1. State manipulation
  2. Form validation (and error messages)
  3. Form submission

We’re going to build a form together in this post. We’ll start with a React component then integrate Formik while demonstrating the way it handles state, validation, and submissions.

Creating a form as a React component

Components live and breathe through their state and prop. What HTML form elements have in common with React components is that they naturally keep some internal state. Their values are also automatically stored in their value attribute.

Allowing form elements to manage their own state in React makes them uncontrolled components. That’s just a fancy way of saying the DOM handles the state instead of React. And while that works, it is often easier to use controlled components, where React handles the state and serves as the single source of truth rather than the DOM.

The markup for a straightforward HTML form might look something like this:

<form>
  <div className="formRow">
    <label htmlFor="email">Email address</label>
    <input type="email" name="email" className="email" />
  </div>
  <div className="formRow">
    <label htmlFor="password">Password</label>
    <input type="password" name="password" className="password" />
  </div>
  <button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>

We can convert that into a controlled React component like so:

function HTMLForm() {
  const [email, setEmail] = React.useState("");
  const [password, setPassword] = React.useState("");


  return (
    <form>
      <div className="formRow">
        <label htmlFor="email">Email address</label>
        <input
          type="email"
          name="email"
          className="email"
          value={email}
          onChange={e => setEmail(e.target.value)}
        />
      </div>
      <div className="formRow">
        <label htmlFor="password">Password</label>
        <input
          type="password"
          name="password"
          className="password"
          value={password}
          onChange={e => setPassword(e.target.value)}
        />
      </div>
      <button type="submit">Submit</button>
    </form>
  );
}

This is a bit verbose but it comes with some benefits:

  1. We get a single source of truth for form values in the state.
  2. We can validate the form when and how we want.
  3. We get performance perks by loading what we need and when we need it.

OK, so why Formik again?

As it is with anything JavaScript, there’s already a bevy of form management libraries out there, like React Hook Form and Redux Form, that we can use. But there are several things that make Formik stand out from the pack:

  1. It’s declarative: Formik eliminates redundancy through abstraction and taking responsibility for state, validation and submissions.
  2. It offers an Escape Hatch: Abstraction is good, but forms are peculiar to certain patterns. Formik abstracts for you but also let’s you control it should you need to.
  3. It co-locates form states: Formik keeps everything that has to do with your form within your form components.
  4. It’s adaptable: Formik doesn’t enforce any rules on you. You can use as less or as much Formik as you need.
  5. Easy to use: Formik just works.

Sound good? Let’s implement Formik into our form component.

Going Formik

We will be building a basic login form to get our beaks wet with the fundamentals. We’ll be touching on three different ways to work with Formik:

  1. Using the useFormik hook
  2. Using Formik with React context
  3. Using withFormik as a higher-order component

I’ve created a demo with the packages we need, Formik and Yup.

Method 1: Using the useFormik hook

As it is right now, our form does nothing tangible. To start using Formik, we need to import the useFormik hook. When we use the hook, it returns all of the Formik functions and variables that help us manage the form. If we were to log the returned values to the console, we get this:

Showing console output of the various hooks and objects that are logged by Formik.

We’ll call useFormik and pass it initialValues to start. Then, an onSubmit handler fires when a form submission happens. Here’s how that looks:

// This is a React component
function BaseFormik() {
  const formik = useFormik({
    initialValues: {
      email: "",
      password: ""
    },
    onSubmit(values) {
      // This will run when the form is submitted
    }
  });
  
 // If you're curious, you can run this Effect
 //  useEffect(() => {
 //   console.log({formik});
 // }, [])


  return (
    // Your actual form
  )
}

Then we’ll bind Formik to our form elements:

// This is a React component
function BaseFormik() {
  const formik = useFormik({
    initialValues: {
      email: "",
      password: ""
    },
    onSubmit(values) {
      // This will run when the form is submitted
    }
  });
  
 // If you're curious, you can run this Effect
 //  useEffect(() => {
 //   console.log({formik});
 // }, [])


  return (
  // We bind "onSubmit" to "formik.handleSubmit"
  <form className="baseForm" onSubmit={formik.handleSubmit} noValidate>
    <input
      type="email"
      name="email"
      id="email"
      className="email formField"
      value={formik.values.email} // We also bind our email value
      onChange={formik.handleChange} // And, we bind our "onChange" event.
    />
  </form>
  )
}

This is how the binding works:

  1. It handles form submission with onSubmit={formik.handleSubmit}.
  2. It handles the state of inputs with value={formik.values.email} and onChange={formik.handleChange}.

If you take a closer look, we didn’t have to set up our state, nor handle the onChange or onSubmit events as we’d typically do with React.

However as you might have noticed, our form contains some redundancy. We had to drill down formik and manually bind the form input’s value and onChange event. That means we should de-structure the returned value and immediately bind the necessary props to a dependent field, like this:

// This is a React component
function BaseFormik() {
  const {getFieldProps, handleSubmit} = useFormik({
    initialValues: {
      email: "",
      password: ""
    },
    onSubmit(values) {
      // This will run when the form is submitted
    }
  });
  
 // If you're curious, you can run this Effect
 //  useEffect(() => {
 //   console.log({formik});
 // }, [])


  return (
  <form className="baseForm" onSubmit={handleSubmit} noValidate>
    <input
      type="email"
      id="email"
      className="email formField"
      {...getFieldProps("email")} // We pass the name of the dependent field
    />
  </form>
  )
}

Let’s take things even further with the included <Formik/>  component.

Method 2: Using Formik with React context

The <Formik/> component exposes various other components that adds more abstraction and sensible defaults. For example, components like <Form/>, <Field/>, and <ErrorMessage/> are ready to go right out of the box.

Keep in mind, you don’t have to use these components when working with <Formik/> but they do require <Formik/> (or withFormik) when using them.

Using <Formik/> requires an overhaul because it uses the render props pattern as opposed to hooks with useFormik. The render props pattern isn’t something new in React. It is a pattern that enables code re-usability between components — something hooks solve better. Nevertheless, <Formik/> has a bagful of custom components that make working with forms much easier.

import { Formik } from "formik";


function FormikRenderProps() {
  const initialValues = {
    email: "",
    password: ""
  };
  function onSubmit(values) {
    // Do stuff here...
    alert(JSON.stringify(values, null, 2));
  }
  return (
      <Formik {...{ initialValues, onSubmit }}>
        {({ getFieldProps, handleSubmit }) => (
            <form className="baseForm" onSubmit={handleSubmit} noValidate>
              <input
                type="email"
                id="email"
                className="email formField"
                {...getFieldProps("email")}
              />
            </form>
        )}
      </Formik>
  );
}

Notice that initialValues and onSubmit have been completely detached from useFormik. This means we are able to pass the props that <Formik/> needs, specifically initialValues and useFormik.

<Formik/> returns a value that’s been de-structured into getFieldProps and handleSubmit. Everything else basically remains the same as the first method using useFormik.

Here’s a refresher on React render props if you’re feeling a little rusty.

We haven’t actually put any <Formik/> components to use just yet. I’ve done this intentionally to demonstrate Formik’s adaptability. We certainly do want to use those components for our form fields, so let’s rewrite the component so it uses the <Form/> component.

import { Formik, Field, Form } from "formik";


function FormikRenderProps() {
  const initialValues = {
    email: "",
    password: ""
  };
  function onSubmit(values) {
    // Do stuff here...
    alert(JSON.stringify(values, null, 2));
  }
  return (
      <Formik {...{ initialValues, onSubmit }}>
        {() => (
            <Form className="baseForm" noValidate>
              <Field
                type="email"
                id="email"
                className="email formField"
                name="email"
              />
            </Form>
        )}
      </Formik>
  );
}

We replaced <form/> with <Form/> and removed the onSubmit handler since Formik handles that for us. Remember, it takes on all the responsibilities for handling forms.

We also replaced <input/> with <Field/> and removed the bindings. Again, Formik handles that.

There’s also no need to bother with the returned value from <Formik/> anymore. You guessed it, Formik handles that as well.

Formik handles everything for us. We can now focus more on the business logic of our forms rather than things that can essentially be abstracted.

We’re pretty much set to go and guess what? We’ve haven’t been concerned with state managements or form submissions!

“What about validation?” you may ask. We haven’t touched on that because it’s a whole new level on its own. Let’s touch on that before jumping to the last method.

Form validation with Formik

If you’ve ever worked with forms (and I bet you have), then you’re aware that validation isn’t something to neglect.

We want to take control of when and how to validate so new opportunities open up to create better user experiences. Gmail, for example, will not let you input a password unless the email address input is validated and authenticated. We could also do something where we validate on the spot and display messaging without additional interactions or page refreshes.

Here are three ways that Formik is able to handle validation:

  1. At the form level
  2. At the field level
  3. With manual triggers

Validation at the form level means validating the form as a whole. Since we have immediate access to form values, we can validate the entire form at once by either:

Both validate and validationSchema are functions that return an errors object with key/value pairings that those of initialValues. We can pass those to  useFormik, <Formik/> or withFormik

While validate is used for custom validations, validationSchema is used with a third-party library like Yup. 

Here’s an example using validate:

// Pass the `onSubmit` function that gets called when the form is submitted.
const formik = useFormik({
  initialValues: {
    email: "",
    password: ""
  },
  // We've added a validate function
  validate() {
    const errors = {};
    // Add the touched to avoid the validator validating all fields at once
    if (formik.touched.email && !formik.values.email) {
      errors.email = "Required";
    } else if (
      !/^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i.test(formik.values.email)
    ) {
      errors.email = "Invalid email address";
    }
    if (formik.touched.password && !formik.values.password) {
      errors.password = "Required";
    } else if (formik.values.password.length <= 8) {
      errors.password = "Must be more than 8 characters";
    }
    return errors;
  },
  onSubmit(values) {
    // Do stuff here...
  }
});
// ...

And here we go with an example using validationSchema instead:

const formik = useFormik({
  initialValues: {
    email: "",
    password: ""
  },
  // We used Yup here.
  validationSchema: Yup.object().shape({
    email: Yup.string()
      .email("Invalid email address")
      .required("Required"),
    password: Yup.string()
      .min(8, "Must be more than 8 characters")
      .required("Required")
  }),
  onSubmit(values) {
    // Do stuff here...
  }
});

Validating at the field level or using manual triggers are fairly simple to understand. Albeit, you’ll likely use form level validation most of the time. It’s also worth checking out the docs to see other use cases.

Method 3: Using withFormik as a higher-order component

withFormik is a higher-order component and be used that way if that’s your thing. Write the form, then expose it through Formik.

A couple of practical examples

So far, we’ve become acquainted with Formik, covered the benefits of using it for creating forms in React, and covered a few methods to implement it as a React component while demonstrating various ways we can use it for validation. What we haven’t done is looked at examples of those key concepts.

So, let’s look at a couple of practical applications: displaying error messages and generating a username based on what’s entered in the email input.

Displaying error messages

We’ve built our form and validated it. And we’ve caught some errors that can be found in our errors object. But it’s no use if we aren’t actually displaying those errors.

Formik makes this a pretty trivial task. All we need to do is check the errors object returned by any of the methods we’ve looked at — <Formik/>, useFormik or withFormik — and display them:

<label className="formFieldLabel" htmlFor="email">
  Email address
  <span className="errorMessage">
    {touched["email"] && errors["email"]}
  </span>
</label>
<div className="formFieldWrapInner">
  <input
    type="email"
    id="email"
    className="email formField"
    {...getFieldProps("email")}
  />
</div>

If there’s an error during validation, {touched["email"] && errors["email"]} will display it to the user.

We could do the same with <ErrorMessage/>. With this, we only need to tell it the name of the dependent field to watch:

<ErrorMessage name="email">
  {errMsg => <span className="errorMessage">{errMsg}</span>}
</ErrorMessage>

Generating a username from an email address

Imagine a form that automatically generates a username for your users based on their email address. In other words, whatever the user types into the email input gets pulled out, stripped of @ and everything after it, and leaves us with a username with what’s left.

For example: [email protected] produces @jane.

Formik exposes helpers that can “intercept” its functionality and lets us perform some effects.In the case of auto-generating a username, one way will be through Formik’s setValues:

onSubmit(values) {
  // We added a `username` value for the user which is everything before @ in their email address.
  setValues({
    ...values,
    username: `@${values.email.split("@")[0]}`
  });
}

Type in an email address and password, then submit the form to see your new username!

Wrapping up

Wow, we covered a lot of ground in a short amount of space. While this is merely the tip of the iceberg as far as covering all the needs of a form and what Formik is capable of doing, I hope this gives you a new tool to reach for the next time you find yourself tackling forms in a React application.

If you’re ready to take Formik to the next level, I’d suggest looking through their resources as a starting point. There are so many goodies in there and it’s a good archive of what Formik can do as well as more tutorials that get into deeper use cases.

Good luck with your forms!