惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
爱范儿
爱范儿
D
DataBreaches.Net
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
S
Secure Thoughts
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 【当耐特】
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 叶小钗
P
Proofpoint News Feed
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
T
ThreatConnect
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
T
Threatpost
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - Franky
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Project Zero
Project Zero
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
罗磊的独立博客
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
腾讯CDC
F
Future of Privacy Forum
F
Full Disclosure
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
J
Java Code Geeks
李成银的技术随笔
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
H
Hacker News: Front Page
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园_首页
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
美团技术团队
Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com

CSS-Tricks

Revealing Text With CSS letter-spacing | CSS-Tricks Technical Writing in the AI Age | CSS-Tricks Cross-Document View Transitions: Scaling Across Hundreds of Elements | CSS-Tricks Cross-Document View Transitions: Scaling Across Hundreds of Elements | CSS-Tricks The State of CSS Centering in 2026 | CSS-Tricks Stack Overflow: When We Stop Asking | CSS-Tricks Cross-Document View Transitions: The Gotchas Nobody Mentions | CSS-Tricks What’s !important #11: 3D Voxel Scenes, Flying Focus, CSS Syntaxes, and More | CSS-Tricks Computing and Displaying Discounted Prices in CSS | CSS-Tricks rotateX() | CSS-Tricks rotateY() | CSS-Tricks rotateZ() | CSS-Tricks rotate() | CSS-Tricks Soon We Can Finally Banish JavaScript to the ShadowRealm | CSS-Tricks Using CSS corner-shape For Folded Corners | CSS-Tricks A Scrollytelling Gift for Mum on Mother’s Day 2026 | CSS-Tricks Google’s Prompt API | CSS-Tricks Making Zigzag CSS Layouts With a Grid + Transform Trick | CSS-Tricks Fixed-Height Cards: More Fragile Than They Look | CSS-Tricks What’s !important #10: HTML-in-Canvas, Hex Maps, E-ink Optimization, and More | CSS-Tricks The Importance of Native Randomness in CSS | CSS-Tricks contrast() | CSS-Tricks contrast-color() | CSS-Tricks Let’s Use the Nonexistent ::nth-letter Selector Now | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #126 Recreating Apple’s Vision Pro Animation in CSS | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #125 Enhancing Astro With a Markdown Component | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #124 Markdown + Astro = ❤️ | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #123 What’s !important #9: clip-path Jigsaws, View Transitions Toolkit, Name-only Containers, and More | CSS-Tricks A Well-Designed JavaScript Module System is Your First Architecture Decision | CSS-Tricks hypot() | CSS-Tricks The Radio State Machine | CSS-Tricks 7 View Transitions Recipes to Try | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #122 Quick Hit #121 Selecting a Date Range in CSS | CSS-Tricks saturate() | CSS-Tricks justify-self | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #120 Alternatives to the !important Keyword | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #119 New CSS Multi-Column Layout Features in Chrome | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #118 Making Complex CSS Shapes Using shape() | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #117 Front-End Fools: Top 10 April Fools’ UI Pranks of All Time | CSS-Tricks Sniffing Out the CSS Olfactive API | CSS-Tricks What’s !important #8: Light/Dark Favicons, @mixin, object-view-box, and More | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #116 Form Automation Tips for Happier User and Clients | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #115 Generative UI Notes | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #114 Quick Hit #113 Experimenting With Scroll-Driven corner-shape Animations | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #112 JavaScript for Everyone: Destructuring | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #111 Quick Hit #110 What’s !important #7: random(), Folded Corners, Anchored Container Queries, and More | CSS-Tricks 4 Reasons That Make Tailwind Great for Building Layouts | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #109 Quick Hit #108 Abusing Customizable Selects | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #107 The Value of z-index | CSS-Tricks Quick Hit #106 The Different Ways to Select <html> in CSS Quick Hit #105 Popover API or Dialog API: Which to Choose? Quick Hit #104 What’s !important #6: :heading, border-shape, Truncating Text From the Middle, and More Yet Another Way to Center an (Absolute) Element An Exploit ... in CSS?! Quick Hit #103 A Complete Guide to Bookmarklets Quick Hit #102 Loading Smarter: SVG vs. Raster Loaders in Modern Web Design Potentially Coming to a Browser :near() You Quick Hit #101 Distinguishing "Components" and "Utilities" in Tailwind Quick Hit #100 Spiral Scrollytelling in CSS With sibling-index() Interop 2026 Quick Hit #99 What’s !important #5: Lazy-loading iframes, Repeating corner-shape Backgrounds, and More Quick Hit #98 Making a Responsive Pyramidal Grid With Modern CSS Approximating contrast-color() With Other CSS Features Quick Hit #97 Trying to Make the Perfect Pie Chart in CSS Quick Hit #96 Quick Hit #95 CSS Bar Charts Using Modern Functions Quick Hit #94 No Hassle Visual Code Theming: Publishing an Extension Quick Hit #93
Adventures in CSS Semi-Transparency Land
CSS-Tricks · 2020-03-09 · via CSS-Tricks

Recently, I was asked to make some tweaks to a landing page and, among the things I found in the code, there were two semitransparent overlays — both with the same RGB values for the background-color — on top of an image. Something like this:

<img src='myImage.jpg'/>
<div class='over1'></div>
<div class='over2'></div>

There was no purpose to having two of them other than the fact that having just one didn’t tint the image enough. For some reason, whoever initially coded that page thought that adding another semitransparent overlay was a better idea than increasing the opacity of the first.

So, I decided to ditch a layer and give the remaining one an opacity value that would give a visual result equivalent to the initial one, given by using two layers. Alright, but how do we get the opacity of the one layer equivalent?

If you remember my crash course in mask compositing, then you may have guessed the answer because it’s the exact same formula that we also use for the add compositing operation! Given two layers with alphas a0 and a1, the resulting alpha is:

a0 + a1 - a0⋅a1

The interactive demo below shows a comparative look at a two-layer overlay with alphas a0 and a1 (which you can control via the range inputs) versus a one layer overlay with an alpha of a0 + a1 - a0⋅a1.

See the Pen by thebabydino (@thebabydino) on CodePen.

Funny enough, they look identical if we remove the image (via the checkbox at the bottom of the demo), but seem a bit different with the image underneath. Perhaps the difference is just my eyes playing tricks on me given the image is lighter in some parts and darker in others.

It definitely doesn’t look different if we don’t have them side by side and we just switch between the two layers of alphas a0 and a1 and the one layer of alpha a0 + a1 - a0⋅a1.

See the Pen by thebabydino (@thebabydino) on CodePen.

This can be extended to multiple layers. In this case, we compute the equivalent layer of the bottom two layers, then the equivalent layer of this result and the layer right on top of it, and so on:

Diagram. Illustrates how a bunch of semitransparent layers of various alphas are reduced to a single one. We start by taking the first two from the bottom and computing their equivalent, then we take this result and the third layer from the bottom and combine them into a single layer and so on.
Reducing multiple semitransparent layers to a single one.

Playing with this has also made me wonder about the solid background equivalent of a solid layer (c0) with a semitransparent overlay (c1 with an alpha of a) on top. In this case, the background of the one layer equivalent is computed on a per channel basis, with the resulting channels being:

ch0 + (ch1 - ch0)*a

…where ch0 is a channel (red, green or blue) of the solid bottom layer, ch1 the corresponding channel of the top semitransparent layer, and a the alpha of the same top semitransparent layer.

Putting this into Sass code, we have:

/* per channel function */
@function res-ch($ch0, $ch1, $a) {
  @return $ch0 + ($ch1 - $ch0)*$a
}

@function res-col($c0, $c1, $a) {
  $ch: 'red' 'green' 'blue'; /* channel names */
  $nc: length($ch); /* number of channels */
  $ch-list: ();

  @for $i from 0 to $nc {
    $fn: nth($ch, $i + 1);
    $ch-list: $ch-list, 
      res-ch(call($fn, $c0), call($fn, $c1), $a);
  }

  @return RGB($ch-list)
}

The interactive demo below (which lets us pick the RGB values of the two layers as well as the alpha of the top one by clicking the swatches and the alpha value, respectively) shows a comparative look at the two layer versus our computed one layer equivalent.

See the Pen by thebabydino (@thebabydino) on CodePen.

Depending on the device, operating system and browser, you may see the two panels in the demo above have identical backgrounds… or not. The formula is correct, but how different browsers on different operating systems and devices deal with the two layer case may vary.

Screenshot collage.
Expected result with panels being identical on the left vs. the slightly different result we may sometimes get between the two layer scenario (top right) and the one layer scenario (bottom right).

I asked for screenshots of a simplified test case on Twitter and, from the replies that I got, the two panels always seem to look the same on mobile browsers, regardless of whether we’re talking about Android or iOS devices as well as Firefox, regardless of the operating system. They also seem to almost always be identical on Windows, though I did receive a reply letting me know both Chrome and Chromium Edge may sometimes show the two panels differently.

When it comes to WebKit browsers on macOS and Linux, results are very much mixed, with the panels slightly different in most cases. That said, switching to a sRGB profile could make them identical. The funniest thing here is, when using a two monitor setup, dragging the window from one monitor to the other can make the difference whether the two panels appear or disappear.

However, in a real use case scenario, the difference is pretty small and we’re never going to have the two panels side-by-side. Even if there’s a difference, nobody is going to know about it unless they test the page in different scenarios, which is something probably only a web developer would do anyway. And it’s not like we don’t also have differences between how the same plain old solid backgrounds look on different devices, operating systems and browsers. For example, #ffa800, which gets used a lot here on CSS-Tricks, doesn’t look the same on my Ubuntu and Windows laptops. The same can be said about the way people’s eyes may perceive things differently.