惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
V
V2EX
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
D
Docker
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 聂微东
美团技术团队
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
F
Fortinet All Blogs
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
L
LangChain Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
博客园 - 叶小钗
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
H
Help Net Security
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
The Cloudflare Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
T
Threatpost
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Latest news
Latest news
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
罗磊的独立博客
P
Proofpoint News Feed
腾讯CDC
S
Schneier on Security
雷峰网
雷峰网
A
About on SuperTechFans
T
Tenable Blog
F
Full Disclosure
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
博客园_首页
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
K
Kaspersky official blog

Catchpoint Blog

SRE Report: AI optimism and the economics of effort SRE Report: Why fast is what users trust The SRE Report 2026: Defensible Ns SRE Report 2026: What surprised us, what didn't, and why the gaps matter most Why Synthetic Tracing Delivers Better Data, Not Just More Data A New Chapter: LogicMonitor + Catchpoint – A Personal Note from Mehdi Mezmo + Catchpoint deliver observability SREs can rely on The four pillars holding up your digital business, and what happens when they crumble When payments pause: lessons from a global payments outage Observability 2025 Decoded: What the DZone Report Means for SLO-Driven Ops The next evolution of WebPageTest has arrived, and it’s a game-changer The Monitoring Blind Spot That Could Cost You Black Friday Powering Mexico’s Digital Future: Expanded Internet Observability with Catchpoint The Next Chapter of WebPageTest: Your New Experience Starts Soon SRE Report Retrospectives — Have AIOps Predictions Held Up? When BGP becomes UX: The inside story of a SaaS routing decision gone wrong (or right) Session Replay explained: A guide to seeing digital experience through your user’s eyes Making the invisible visible: Are your cloud firewalls and DDoS protection really working? Why it’s time to move beyond APM: Monitoring from the user’s perspective When metrics mislead: Inside the 2025 Retail Web Performance Benchmark The vendor trap: why your next outage won’t be your fault—but will be your problem LLMs don’t stand still: How to monitor and trust the models powering your AI Semantic Caching: What We Measured, Why It Matters The Annual SRE Survey Is Open—We Want to Hear from You Observability isn’t about the tool. It’s about the truth Invisible dependencies, visible impact: Lessons from the Google Cloud outage Real-time detection of BGP blackholing and prefix hijacks Leading analyst firm reveals the real cost of internet disruptions The Power of Over 3000 Intelligent Observability Agents Monitoring in the Age of Complexity: 5 Assumptions CIOs Need to Rethink Why Intelligent Traffic Steering is Critical for Performance and Cost Optimization Retail digital performance event recap: Key insights from IBM & Catchpoint Zendesk outage: A case for proactive monitoring and faster incident response The $1 Million Lesson: Building a Culture of Quality Through SLAs When AI tools fail: How to map your AI dependencies for proactive visibility Why Super Bowl 2025 was a triumph for Internet Resilience Why Internet Performance Monitoring is the new health check for IT organizations Why use Playwright in Catchpoint for synthetic monitoring Introducing WebPageTest Expert Plan: Real-Time Insights, Synthetic + RUM together in One Platform The shift to digital: How businesses are reshaping their priorities for 2025 The SRE Report 2025's Call to Action Monitoring in the Age of the Internet: DEM, IPM, and APM—What You Need to Know SSL Monitoring, Trust, and McLOVIN Performing for the holidays: Look beyond uptime for season sales success Lessons from Microsoft’s office 365 Outage: The Importance of third-party monitoring Web Performance Experts Look into the Future of Web Performance The hidden challenges of Internet Resilience: Key insights from 2024 report When SSL Issues aren’t just about SSL: A deep dive into the TIBCO Mashery outage The curious case of Marriott and the untold impact of web performance on revenue Preparing for the unexpected: Lessons from the AJIO and Jio Outage It’s time to stop neglecting the elephant in the room: Performance Matters! The Need for Speed: Highlights from IBM and Catchpoint’s Global DNS Performance Study Learnings from ServiceNow’s Proactive Response to a Network Breakdown Webinar Recap: Taking Web Performance to the Next Level Use the Catchpoint Terraform Provider in your CI/CD workflows Is the Internet ready for L4S? Takeaways from the CrowdStrike outage: third-parties can pose risk July 19th global IT outage reminds us of digital complexity Agentic AI: Powerful But Fragile—What You Need to Know Demystifying API Monitoring and Testing with IPM Cloudflare outage: another wake-up call for resilience planning Cloudflare’s Resolver Outage: More Than Just DNS Cloud Monitoring's Blind Spot: The User Perspective Connected Devices: Unlocking the next frontier of Internet Performance Monitoring Consolidation and Modernization in Enterprise Observability Catchpoint named a leader in the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Digital Experience Monitoring Catchpoint Peak Performance Summit 2025: Redefining Observability for the Outcome Economy Catchpoint Expands Observability Network to Barcelona: A Growing Internet Hub Catch frustration before it costs you: New tools for a better user experience Creating the IPM Category: Catchpoint’s Journey to Leadership and the LogicMonitor Era AWS Outage: How do you prepare for the failure of your own safety net? Achieving stability with agility in your CI/CD pipeline APM vs Observability: Observing beyond APM APM vs Observability: What comes next? APM vs observability: why your definitions are broken AppAssure: Ensuring the resilience of your Tier-1 applications just became easier APM vs Observability: Both-and, not either-or 2024: A banner year for Internet Resilience 5 Actions you can take to improve digital performance Fast and furious: The importance of performance in the digital age How SAP achieved world-class uptime through modern observability How AI Turns Monitoring From “What Now?” Into “What’s Next?” How IPM helped a top tech brand catch an OpenAI outage before it became a crisis Google’s Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol is here—Now Let’s Make it Observable Here’s the proof: What the fastest sites on the web have in common Going for gold: Testing the resilience of Olympic websites From SEO to AEO: Why Web Performance Is the Key to AI Search Success From the source to the edge: the six agent types you can’t ignore Getting Started with Traceroute How to Monitor AI Agents in Commerce Systems From refresh to results: the metrics that shaped Election Day 2024 coverage Escalating risk, shrinking margins: The 2025 Internet Resilience Report Don’t get caught in the dark: Lessons from a Lumen & AWS micro-outage ECN explained: Navigate congestion for faster, smoother data delivery DNS misconfiguration can happen to anyone - the question is how fast can you detect it? Diagnosing Wi-Fi failures that traditional tools miss: a case study Did Delta's slow web performance signal trouble before CrowdStrike? Customer Survey 2024: Unveiling insights and impact Critical Requirements for Modern API Monitoring
Silence during chaos: Why the X outage is a call to arms for proactive monitoring
2025-03-11 · via Catchpoint Blog

When X (formerly Twitter) suffered a global outage on March 10-11, 2025, millions of users and businesses were left searching for answers. Apart from a brief post from CEO Elon Musk referencing a DDoS (Denial of Service) attack, official details were limited. Catchpoint’s Internet Sonar detected the crisis in real time, highlighting the critical role of proactive monitoring.

Below, we dissect the outage’s timeline and the urgent lessons for businesses navigating today’s fragile digital ecosystem.

X outage explained: What happened?  

On March 10, 2025, starting at 5:30 AM EDT, users worldwide were abruptly disconnected from X. Over the next 24 hours, waves of outages—punctuated by brief recoveries—left users stranded, unable to access feeds, send messages, or engage with content. The disruption spanned 30+ countries, from Argentina to the UAE, underscoring the platform’s global reliance.

The outage unfolded in several distinct stages due to connection time outs.  

Tracking the X outage in real time

March 10

  • First wave:
  • 5:30am EDT: First reports of X being down surface.
  • 6:30am EDT: X comes back for most users.
  • Second wave:
  • 9:30am EDT: A second wave of outage reports indicates that X is down again.
  • Third wave:
  • 11:15am EDT: A third wave of outage reports emerges, with X down once again.
  • Recovery phase:
  • 1:15pm EDT: X recovers for many users.
  • 2:15pm EDT: X is working for some, but many continue to report issues.
  • 3:25pm EDT: X (Twitter) recovers for most people.

March 11

  • Additional reports:  
  • 5:00am EDT: A small spike in outage reports appears.

Outages appear to have subsided as of reporting, though this could change as investigations into the route cause continue.  

How did Catchpoint’s Internet Sonar reveal the disruption?

Catchpoint’s Internet Sonar detected multiple outages for X in real time as the outages unfolded.  

Catchpoint Internet Sonar

The Internet Sonar view above shows how multiple X-related domains were unable to deliver content. These domains are often used to load content on other websites (known as "child requests"). The widespread failures seen across many locations emphasize how extensively the outage disrupted not only X but also other websites relying on X’s infrastructure.  

Scatterplot of X's service disruption

The scatterplot above shows multiple tests run against X Corp’s domains throughout the outage period. The clusters of red dots highlight moments when tests consistently failed or timed out. Each cluster corresponds with one of the outage waves, clearly illustrating the recurring and widespread nature of X’s connection issues during this incident.

A screenshot of a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Waterfall chart from Catchpoint's IPM portal

The waterfall chart above shows that X's servers could initially be reached, but they were extremely slow to respond. Eventually, these requests timed out completely, meaning the servers never delivered the requested content. This highlights the severe delays users experienced during the outage.

A screenshot of a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Traceroute data from Catchpoint's IPM portal

The traceroute data above shows significant issues during the outage, particularly large packet losses and high round-trip times (RTT). High packet loss means that data sent to X's servers was frequently lost along the way, while increased RTT indicates that responses from X’s servers were severely delayed. Both clearly illustrate why users experienced such sluggish performance during the outage.

A screenshot of a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Screenshot showing a typical user experience during the outage—x.com

What caused the outage

CEO Elon Musk attributed the outage to a DDoS attack.

A graph showing a lineAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Wait time data over three day period

Our own data collected over an extended baseline for X corp’s domains shows that during the outage there was a notable spike in the mean wait time. This suggests the servers were slower to respond—an effect that aligns with what typically occurs during a DDoS attack.

Lessons learned: Navigating outages with clarity and preparedness

X’s outage was more than a temporary disruption—it was a masterclass in the vulnerabilities of our digital age. Below, we distill the key lessons for businesses, IT teams, and users alike, emphasizing the need for vigilance and tools that cut through the noise.

1. The internet is interconnected—and fragile

The outage underscored a truth we often overlook: the Internet, for all its vastness, is a delicate tapestry of interdependent systems. A platform as entrenched as X collapsed not once, but repeatedly over 24 hours, leaving millions adrift. This fragility isn’t unique to social media. Modern applications rely on the Internet Stack: layers of third-party services—APIs, cloud providers, DNS resolvers—each a potential point of failure. When one thread unravels, the entire fabric can fray.

A blue and purple rectangular chart with textAI-generated content may be incorrect.

The Internet Stack

Consider the ripple effects of X’s disruption: small businesses lost real-time customer engagement, journalists struggled to share breaking news, and emergency responders in some regions faced communication delays. The takeaway is clear: no platform, no matter how dominant, is immune to disruption. Preparedness begins with acknowledging this vulnerability.

2. Vendor updates are not enough— independent visibility matters

During the outage, users received limited information beyond a brief statement from X’s CEO. This situation isn't uncommon—vendor status pages often struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving incidents. Such delays, however, often lead to confusion and slower response times for impacted businesses and users.

The takeaway here isn't about placing blame—it's about being prepared. Independent, proactive monitoring tools ensure your organization has clear, real-time insights, enabling faster responses and smoother operations, regardless of vendor communication timelines.

3. A better way forward: Independent, proactive monitoring

X’s outage underscored the necessity of proactive, independent monitoring tools that empower businesses to act decisively and quickly. Our users leveraged two key solutions from our portal: Internet Sonar and Internet Stack Map, both of which proved invaluable.

Internet Sonar acted as a lighthouse during the storm, providing real-time, vendor-agnostic insights. It detected the outage’s first ripple, mapped its global spread, and quantified its impact. For IT teams, this meant one critical advantage: time. Instead of reacting to user complaints, they could pivot swiftly, rerouting workflows or notifying stakeholders before the crisis deepened.

A map of the world with red dotsAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Catchpoint's Internet Sonar

Internet Sonar’s map view above shows how widespread the disruption was, with outages reported across multiple locations around the globe.

Internet Stack Map complemented this by visualizing X’s dependencies. When the platform went dark, Stack Map users saw exactly how interconnected services—APIs, authentication layers, content delivery networks—were affected. This turned a black-box event into a navigable challenge. Root-cause analysis, often a days-long slog, became a matter of minutes.

4. Not to be overlooked: deploying a robust WAF solution

To protect against DDoS attacks, ensure you deploy and properly configure a Web Application Firewall (WAF). A robust WAF identifies and mitigates malicious traffic before it impacts your services, complementing independent monitoring by providing proactive security alongside real-time visibility.

The X outage was a stark reminder that in today’s digital world, independent visibility isn't just helpful—it's essential for resilience, preparedness, and maintaining trust in moments of chaos.

View our live Internet outages map powered by Internet Sonar.

Summary

When X (formerly Twitter) suffered a global outage on March 10-11, 2025, millions of users and businesses were left searching for answers. Apart from a brief post from CEO Elon Musk referencing a DDoS (Denial of Service) attack, official details were limited. Catchpoint’s Internet Sonar detected the crisis in real time, highlighting the critical role of proactive monitoring.

Below, we dissect the outage’s timeline and the urgent lessons for businesses navigating today’s fragile digital ecosystem.

X outage explained: What happened?  

On March 10, 2025, starting at 5:30 AM EDT, users worldwide were abruptly disconnected from X. Over the next 24 hours, waves of outages—punctuated by brief recoveries—left users stranded, unable to access feeds, send messages, or engage with content. The disruption spanned 30+ countries, from Argentina to the UAE, underscoring the platform’s global reliance.

The outage unfolded in several distinct stages due to connection time outs.  

Tracking the X outage in real time

March 10

  • First wave:
  • 5:30am EDT: First reports of X being down surface.
  • 6:30am EDT: X comes back for most users.
  • Second wave:
  • 9:30am EDT: A second wave of outage reports indicates that X is down again.
  • Third wave:
  • 11:15am EDT: A third wave of outage reports emerges, with X down once again.
  • Recovery phase:
  • 1:15pm EDT: X recovers for many users.
  • 2:15pm EDT: X is working for some, but many continue to report issues.
  • 3:25pm EDT: X (Twitter) recovers for most people.

March 11

  • Additional reports:  
  • 5:00am EDT: A small spike in outage reports appears.

Outages appear to have subsided as of reporting, though this could change as investigations into the route cause continue.  

How did Catchpoint’s Internet Sonar reveal the disruption?

Catchpoint’s Internet Sonar detected multiple outages for X in real time as the outages unfolded.  

Catchpoint Internet Sonar

The Internet Sonar view above shows how multiple X-related domains were unable to deliver content. These domains are often used to load content on other websites (known as "child requests"). The widespread failures seen across many locations emphasize how extensively the outage disrupted not only X but also other websites relying on X’s infrastructure.  

Scatterplot of X's service disruption

The scatterplot above shows multiple tests run against X Corp’s domains throughout the outage period. The clusters of red dots highlight moments when tests consistently failed or timed out. Each cluster corresponds with one of the outage waves, clearly illustrating the recurring and widespread nature of X’s connection issues during this incident.

A screenshot of a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Waterfall chart from Catchpoint's IPM portal

The waterfall chart above shows that X's servers could initially be reached, but they were extremely slow to respond. Eventually, these requests timed out completely, meaning the servers never delivered the requested content. This highlights the severe delays users experienced during the outage.

A screenshot of a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Traceroute data from Catchpoint's IPM portal

The traceroute data above shows significant issues during the outage, particularly large packet losses and high round-trip times (RTT). High packet loss means that data sent to X's servers was frequently lost along the way, while increased RTT indicates that responses from X’s servers were severely delayed. Both clearly illustrate why users experienced such sluggish performance during the outage.

A screenshot of a computerAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Screenshot showing a typical user experience during the outage—x.com

What caused the outage

CEO Elon Musk attributed the outage to a DDoS attack.

A graph showing a lineAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Wait time data over three day period

Our own data collected over an extended baseline for X corp’s domains shows that during the outage there was a notable spike in the mean wait time. This suggests the servers were slower to respond—an effect that aligns with what typically occurs during a DDoS attack.

Lessons learned: Navigating outages with clarity and preparedness

X’s outage was more than a temporary disruption—it was a masterclass in the vulnerabilities of our digital age. Below, we distill the key lessons for businesses, IT teams, and users alike, emphasizing the need for vigilance and tools that cut through the noise.

1. The internet is interconnected—and fragile

The outage underscored a truth we often overlook: the Internet, for all its vastness, is a delicate tapestry of interdependent systems. A platform as entrenched as X collapsed not once, but repeatedly over 24 hours, leaving millions adrift. This fragility isn’t unique to social media. Modern applications rely on the Internet Stack: layers of third-party services—APIs, cloud providers, DNS resolvers—each a potential point of failure. When one thread unravels, the entire fabric can fray.

A blue and purple rectangular chart with textAI-generated content may be incorrect.

The Internet Stack

Consider the ripple effects of X’s disruption: small businesses lost real-time customer engagement, journalists struggled to share breaking news, and emergency responders in some regions faced communication delays. The takeaway is clear: no platform, no matter how dominant, is immune to disruption. Preparedness begins with acknowledging this vulnerability.

2. Vendor updates are not enough— independent visibility matters

During the outage, users received limited information beyond a brief statement from X’s CEO. This situation isn't uncommon—vendor status pages often struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving incidents. Such delays, however, often lead to confusion and slower response times for impacted businesses and users.

The takeaway here isn't about placing blame—it's about being prepared. Independent, proactive monitoring tools ensure your organization has clear, real-time insights, enabling faster responses and smoother operations, regardless of vendor communication timelines.

3. A better way forward: Independent, proactive monitoring

X’s outage underscored the necessity of proactive, independent monitoring tools that empower businesses to act decisively and quickly. Our users leveraged two key solutions from our portal: Internet Sonar and Internet Stack Map, both of which proved invaluable.

Internet Sonar acted as a lighthouse during the storm, providing real-time, vendor-agnostic insights. It detected the outage’s first ripple, mapped its global spread, and quantified its impact. For IT teams, this meant one critical advantage: time. Instead of reacting to user complaints, they could pivot swiftly, rerouting workflows or notifying stakeholders before the crisis deepened.

A map of the world with red dotsAI-generated content may be incorrect.

Catchpoint's Internet Sonar

Internet Sonar’s map view above shows how widespread the disruption was, with outages reported across multiple locations around the globe.

Internet Stack Map complemented this by visualizing X’s dependencies. When the platform went dark, Stack Map users saw exactly how interconnected services—APIs, authentication layers, content delivery networks—were affected. This turned a black-box event into a navigable challenge. Root-cause analysis, often a days-long slog, became a matter of minutes.

4. Not to be overlooked: deploying a robust WAF solution

To protect against DDoS attacks, ensure you deploy and properly configure a Web Application Firewall (WAF). A robust WAF identifies and mitigates malicious traffic before it impacts your services, complementing independent monitoring by providing proactive security alongside real-time visibility.

The X outage was a stark reminder that in today’s digital world, independent visibility isn't just helpful—it's essential for resilience, preparedness, and maintaining trust in moments of chaos.

View our live Internet outages map powered by Internet Sonar.

This is some text inside of a div block.