惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

F
Fortinet All Blogs
V
Visual Studio Blog
T
Tor Project blog
量子位
Jina AI
Jina AI
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 司徒正美
博客园_首页
罗磊的独立博客
美团技术团队
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
IT之家
IT之家
C
Check Point Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
爱范儿
爱范儿
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
C
Cisco Blogs
GbyAI
GbyAI
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 【当耐特】
T
Tenable Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
小众软件
小众软件
J
Java Code Geeks
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
腾讯CDC
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
P
Proofpoint News Feed
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler

GitHub Enterprise Cloud - EU Status - Incident History

Status Page Migration EU - Investigating Copilot code completions degraded performance EU - Disruption with Copilot Cloud Agent and Copilot Code Review EU - Incident with Actions, Issues and Webhooks EU - Incident with Git Operations EU - Some data not showing in Elastic Search indexes EU - Disruption with users unable to start Claude and Codex agent task from the web EU - Disruption with Copilot chat and Copilot Coding Agent EU - Problems with third-party Claude and Codex Agent sessions not being listed in the agents tab dashboard EU - Copilot Coding Agent failing to start some jobs EU - Incident with Pull Requests: High percentage of 500s EU - Teams Github Notifications App is down EU - Disruption with Copilot Coding Agent Sessions EU - Issues with Copilot Coding Agent EU - Some OpenAI models degraded in Copilot EU - Claude Opus 4.6 Fast not appearing for some Copilot users EU - Incident with Copilot and Actions EU - Delays with Code Scanning and Billing EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Copilot Code Review Failing
EU - Incident with Pull Requests
2022-08-01 · via GitHub Enterprise Cloud - EU Status - Incident History

On April 23, 2026, between 16:05 UTC and 20:43 UTC, the Pull Requests service experienced a regression affecting merge queue operations. PRs merged via merge queue using the squash merge method produced incorrect merge commits when the merge group contained more than one PR. In affected cases, changes from previously merged PRs and prior commits were inadvertently reverted by subsequent merges.

During the impact window 2,092 pull requests were affected. The issue did not affect pull requests merged outside of merge queue, nor merge queue groups using the merge or rebase methods.
It took approximately 3 hours and 33 minutes to identify the issue. The change completed deployment at approximately 16:05 UTC, and we became aware at 19:38 UTC following an increase in customer support inquiries. Because the issue affected merge commit correctness rather than availability, it was not detected by existing automated monitoring and was identified through customer reports.

The regression was introduced by a new code path that adjusted merge base computation for merge queue ref updates. This code path was intended to be gated behind a feature flag for an unreleased feature, but the gating was incomplete.

As a result, the new behavior was inadvertently applied to squash merge groups, producing an incorrect three-way merge. This caused subsequent squash merges to revert changes from earlier pull requests and, in some cases, changes between their starting points.

We mitigated the incident by reverting the code change and force-deploying the fix across all environments. After resolution, we identified affected repositories and sent targeted remediation instructions to repository administrators with step-by-step recovery guidance.

The regression was not identified during internal validation. Existing test coverage primarily exercised single-PR merge queue groups, which did not exhibit the faulty base-reference calculation. Because automated checks did not validate merge correctness for multi-PR squash groups, the defect surfaced only in production.

To prevent recurrence, GitHub is expanding test coverage for merge correctness validation. We are broadening automated coverage for merge queue operations, including regression checks that validate resulting Git contents across supported configurations, so issues affecting merge correctness are caught before reaching production.

We are committed to ensuring the correctness and reliability of merge queue operations. These actions will reduce the risk of similar regressions and improve confidence in future changes to the Pull Requests service.

Posted Apr 23, 2026 - 21:43 UTC