惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
V
V2EX
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
P
Privacy International News Feed
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
美团技术团队
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
V
Visual Studio Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
K
Kaspersky official blog
S
Secure Thoughts
T
Tenable Blog
Security Latest
Security Latest
The Cloudflare Blog
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
H
Heimdal Security Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
IT之家
IT之家
Latest news
Latest news
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
C
Check Point Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
腾讯CDC
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
S
Security Affairs
S
Securelist
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
A
About on SuperTechFans

The latest Octoverse findings - The GitHub Blog

How AI is reshaping developer choice (and Octoverse data proves it) What to expect for open source in 2026 What the fastest-growing tools reveal about how software is being built 7 learnings from Anders Hejlsberg: The architect behind C# and TypeScript The new identity of a developer: What changes and what doesn’t in the AI era “The local-first rebellion”: How Home Assistant became the most important project in your house Why developers still flock to Python: Guido van Rossum on readability, AI, and the future of programming TypeScript, Python, and the AI feedback loop changing software development What 986 million code pushes say about the developer workflow in 2025
Why AI is pushing developers toward typed languages
Cassidy Williams · 2026-01-09 · via The latest Octoverse findings - The GitHub Blog

It’s a tale as old as time: tabs vs. spaces, dark mode vs. light mode, typed languages vs. untyped languages. It all depends!

But as developers use AI tools, not only are they choosing the more popular (thus more trained into the model) libraries and languages, they are also using tools that reduce risk. When code comes not just from developers, but also from their AI tools, reliability becomes a much bigger part of the equation. 

Typed vs. untyped

Dynamic languages like Python and JavaScript make it easy to move quickly when building, and developers who argue for those languages push for the speed and flexibility they provide. But that agility lacks the safety net you get with typed languages.

Untyped code is not gone, and can still be great. I love, personally, that I can just write code and not define every aspect of something on my average side project. But, when you don’t control every line of code, subtle errors can pass, unchecked. That’s when the types-driven safety net concept becomes a lot more appealing, and even necessary. AI just increases the volume of “code you didn’t personally write,” which raises the stakes. 

Type systems fill a unique role of surfacing ambiguous logic and mismatches of expected inputs and outputs. They ensure that code from any source can conform to project standards. They’ve basically become a shared contract between developers, frameworks, and AI tools that are generating more and more scaffolding and boilerplate for developers. 

With AI tools and agents producing larger volumes of code and features than ever, it only makes sense that reliability is more critical. And… that is where typed languages win the debate. Not because untyped languages are “bad,” but because types catch the exact class of surprises that AI-generated code can sometimes introduce.

Is type safety that big of a deal?

Yes!

Next question.

But actually though, a 2025 academic study found that a whopping 94% of LLM-generated compilation errors were type-check failures. Imagine how much your projects would improve if 94% of your failures went away! Your life would be better. Your skin would clear. You’d get taller. Or at least you’d have fewer “why does this return a string now?” debugging sessions.

What Octoverse 2025 says about the rise of typed languages

Octoverse 2025 confirmed it: TypeScript is now the most used language on GitHub, overtaking both Python and JavaScript as of August 2025. TypeScript grew by over 1 million contributors in 2025 (+66% YoY, Aug ‘25 vs. Aug ‘24) with an estimated 2.6 million developers total. This was driven, in part, by frameworks that scaffold projects in TypeScript by default (like Astro, Next.js, and Angular). But the report also found correlative evidence that TypeScript’s rise got a boost from AI-assisted development.

That means AI is influencing not only how fast code is written, but which languages and tools developers use. And typed ecosystems are benefiting too, because they help AI slot new code into existing projects without breaking assumptions. 

It’s not just TypeScript. Other typed languages are growing fast, too! 

Luau, Roblox’s scripting language, saw >194% YoY growth as a gradually typed language. Typst, often compared to LaTeX, but with functional design and strong typing, saw >108% YoY growth. Even older languages like Java, C++, and C# saw more growth than ever in this year’s report.

That means gradual typing, optional typing, and strong typing are all seeing momentum—and each offers different levels of guardrails depending on what you’re building and how much you want AI to automate.  

Where do we go from here?

Type systems don’t replace dynamic languages. But, they have become a common safety feature for developers working with and alongside AI coding tools for a reason. As we see AI-assisted development and agent development increase in popularity, we can expect type systems to become even more central to how we build and ship reliable software.

Static types help ensure that code is more trustworthy and more maintainable. They give developers a shared, predictable structure. That reduction in surprises means you can be in the flow (pun intended!) more.

Written by

Cassidy Williams

Cassidy is senior director for developer advocacy here at GitHub. She enjoys building software, advising startups, and teaching developers how to build better. She has a weekly newsletter at cassidoo.co/newsletter where you can get her updates, practice coding problems, and a joke in your inbox!

Related posts

Explore more from GitHub

Docs

Docs

Everything you need to master GitHub, all in one place.

Go to Docs

GitHub

GitHub

Build what’s next on GitHub, the place for anyone from anywhere to build anything.

Start building

Customer stories

Customer stories

Meet the companies and engineering teams that build with GitHub.

Learn more

The GitHub Podcast

The GitHub Podcast

Catch up on the GitHub podcast, a show dedicated to the topics, trends, stories and culture in and around the open source developer community on GitHub.

Listen now