Voting for judges is one of your toughest ballot tasks. What to consider when making your choices
Finding information about the many judicial candidates on your ballot can be tricky. On Imperfect Paradise, reporter Cato Hernández walks you through races in L.A. and Orange counties and shares important tips from a former judge.
Fifteen judgeships are up for election June 2, and choosing whom to vote for in these races is one of the hardest jobs facing voters. Here, we offer you a guide to how to do just that — and a look at the candidates on the ballot in L.A. County.
Superior Court judges oversee courtroom proceedings and trials across all of L.A. County. There are more than 400 judges in the court system. These trials cover everything having to do with state and local laws, including family law (such as child custody and divorces), landlord and tenant cases, contract disputes, thefts, murder, probate (distributing a person’s possessions after they die) and small claims.
Our limited-run newsletter Make It Make Sense unpacks the ballot count and results, then checks in regularly on officials voted into office and the measures voters pass.
A judge’s job is to act as court referee:
If the law is very clear on a given issue, a judge has to stick to it regardless of how they personally feel. In other cases, laws may be ambiguous, and that’s when a judge has to issue their own interpretation of the law. Judges also have a fair amount of discretion when it comes to handing down penalties, such as the length of a sentence for a criminal conviction or the payment sum for a civil case. That's where it starts to really matter who is in the seat.
Your traffic ticket dispute. Or your child custody case. Or that time you served on a jury.
If you’ve never had to interact with the court system, you’ve definitely heard of a case the L.A. Superior Court has handled: think Britney Spears’ conservatorship, Rebecca Grossman’s trial for killing two boys, the O.J. Simpson trial or the Meta and Google case on social media harms.
The short answer is that it's California law.
Superior Court judges get the job either by a governor's appointment or by winning election. They serve six-year terms, but they don’t always have to face reelection when that time is up.
A seat only appears on your ballot in certain situations. The most common is when there are at least two challengers vying for an office. Seats can also show up when there’s a single candidate who isn't an incumbent. Judges who file reelection paperwork but go unchallenged never appear on the ballot at all — they automatically get another term. In general, we usually have about a dozen or so judges to choose in each election.
If you’re not totally comfortable with the idea of electing judges, you’re not alone. Some states select judges differently, but California has done it this way for a long time. Proposals to stop electing judges here haven’t succeeded.
Lots of people have questioned whether it’s a good idea to elect our judiciary — does it cause judges to worry more about being popular instead of making the right decisions in cases? Some critics also point to L.A.’s 2006 judicial elections, in which a well-respected sitting judge who had served on the court for over 20 years unexpectedly lost her seat to a bagel shop owner with much less legal experience who spent way more money on campaign advertising.
It depends on how much time you want to commit. Here are some options:
You can also see what other people think of a particular judge. The Robing Room and Rate My Judge are like Yelp reviews for the court system — but take them with a grain of salt. Some Superior Court judges have few reviews, if any. And since anyone can post, many of the ratings aren’t considered as fair as a formal evaluation.
Evaluating judicial candidates is notoriously hard. This is really not an easy task for the average voter. Since many candidates are wary of politicizing judgeships, they don’t spend a lot of money on campaign advertising, which makes it hard to find out who they are or what they stand for. Plus, these are nonpartisan seats, so you don’t have the option of just voting for candidates who identify as a member of the party with which you’re registered.
But there are a few pieces of information that can help with your decision. Stuart Rice, a retired L.A. County Superior Court judge and a past president of the California Judges Association, shared his tips with LAist here.
This is the main professional association for L.A.’s legal community. During every election, LACBA undertakes a lengthy evaluation process for each judicial candidate. (You can find the ratings for this election cycle here and we've included them in our guide below.) The ratings are one of the only ways for a voter without a legal background to assess whether a candidate is qualified for the bench.
With LACBA, candidates fill out questionnaires, face an evaluation committee and submit 50 to 75 people who know their work and can act as personal references. The committee gives candidates one of four ratings: Exceptionally Well Qualified, Well Qualified, Qualified or Not Qualified. They don’t share reasons for a particular rating unless someone declined to participate.
The ratings can be a useful way to evaluate a candidate because they’re supposed to take temperament and personality into account in addition to legal ability. That ties in to what Rice said is most important for a candidate to have: proper judicial demeanor.
“To me, it means you treat everybody the same. You treat everybody with respect. You treat everybody with dignity. You’re impartial,” Rice said. “You set a tone in that courtroom so that the litigants don’t feel like they’re in an environment where they can be yelling at each other in the courtroom.”
Keep in mind, these ratings are the opinion of a private, volunteer membership group unaffiliated with the state bar. Other groups may find candidates more or less qualified. Past candidates have raised fairness concerns with the process, though LACBA maintains that committee members are told to be non-biased.
These are nonpartisan seats, but you’ll still see endorsements from newspapers, politicians and issue-based organizations, just like any political contest. If there’s an organization you trust, their endorsement might tip the scales for you.
The role of political parties in society is so strong that things are changing. According to Rice, the courts have become more political in recent elections.
“ The candidates, despite this being a nonpartisan race, really want to get the endorsement of the Democratic Party,” Rice said. “That's because L.A. is overwhelmingly Democratic.”
The only requirement for being a judge is to have at least 10 years in one of two paths: being authorized to practice law in California (usually by passing the bar exam); or serving as a judge in the state. That means you might find a wide range of legal experience among candidates. If they were a judge before, or have significant trial experience, that’s a big clue as to how prepared they may be for the job on Day 1. Having a history as a prosecutor or defense attorney can also tell you they’ve had a lot of experience in court, and give you an idea of their potential approach to criminal justice issues.
Here are some common job titles you may see on the ballot and what they mean:
Campaign websites can give you more detailed information about a candidate’s background, mission and experience. Someone serious about their campaign will have a website, Rice said. Pay attention to how sophisticated it is and what they choose to say about themselves.
“ They may say vote for me. I’m the one that’s going to change the world,” Rice said. “Well, judges are supposed to interpret the law, not make the law. There are a variety of things that might impress one voter and turn off a different voter.”
Candidates could also express viewpoints there that they shouldn’t. Anyone running for a judicial seat is bound by the California ethics code. Among the restrictions, candidates need to avoid creating an appearance of political bias, or implying how they would rule on an issue that could come before the court.
For races that have only two candidates, the winner will be decided in the June primary. Whoever gets more than 50% of the vote wins outright. For the rest, if no one gets more than half of the votes, the top two vote getters move on to the general election in November.
When information is missing
Some candidates did not reply to our requests for images. Some did not have a campaign website and/or list of endorsements available online at the time of publication. We will update this guide as more candidate information becomes available.
L.A. County has 32 candidates vying for 15 seats, but only 11 are contested. It can be difficult to learn about sitting judges, so we've included their profile on Trellis Law, a legal research website, and information showing how they reached the bench. For attorneys, we’ve included their State Bar profiles.
This year, LAist asked all candidates in contested judicial races to complete a survey. We’ve included their responses below and noted who did not answer. Responses were limited to 800 characters, and LAist did not edit the candidates' submissions.
Robert S. Draper
(
Courtesy of the campaign
)
Tal Valbuena
(
Axel Koester Photography
)
Judge of the Superior Court
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Angie Christides
(
Courtesy Angie Christides
)
Irene Lee
(
Courtesy of the campaign
)
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
This candidate will be on the ballot but the race is uncontested.
Deputy public defender, County of Los Angeles
This candidate will be on the ballot but the race is uncontested.
Chief assistant city attorney, City of Glendale
From left, candidates Rhonda Haymon and Maria Ghobadi
(
Courtesy of the campaigns
)
Attorney at law
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Deputy public defender, County of Los Angeles
Francisco Amador did not respond to LAist's survey.
Chellei G. Jimenez
(
Courtesy Chellei G. Jimenez
)
Deputy public defender, County of Los Angeles
Attorney
Samuel Wolloch Krause
(
Courtesy Samuel Wolloch Krause
)
Anna Slotky Reitano
(
Courtesy Anna Slotky Reitano
)
Attorney/legal author
Deputy county counsel, County of Los Angeles
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Attorney at law
From left, candidates Dan Kapelovitz and David Walgren.
(
Hadley Gustafson, courtesy of the Dan Kapelovitz campaign | Courtesy of the David Walgren campaign
)
Attorney/experimental filmmaker
Judge of the Superior Court
The candidates, from left: Anthony Bayne, David DeJute and Sharee Sanders Gordon.
(
Courtesy of the campaigns
)
Deputy public defender, County of Los Angeles
Law professor/attorney
Deputy city attorney, City of Los Angeles
Pat Connolly
(
Courtesy of the campaign
)
Paul A. Thompson
(
Courtesy Paul A. Thompson
)
Judge of the Superior Court
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Carlos Dammeier
(
Courtesy of the campaign
)
Administrative law judge, Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, State of California
Deputy alternate public defender, County of Los Angeles
Donna Tryfman
(
Geoffrey Donne Photography
)
Administrative law judge, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California
Deputy public defender, County of Los Angeles
This candidate will be on the ballot but the race is uncontested.
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Gloria Marin
(
Courtesy of the campaign
)
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
Deputy public defender, County of Los Angeles
Thanayi Lindsey
(
Courtesy Thanayi Lindsey
)
Superior Court commissioner
Administrative law judge, Office Of Administrative Hearings, State Of California
This candidate will be on the ballot but the race is uncontested.
Deputy district attorney, County of Los Angeles
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。