惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
博客园 - Franky
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
量子位
博客园 - 聂微东
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
爱范儿
爱范儿
V
Visual Studio Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 叶小钗
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
U
Unit 42
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
小众软件
小众软件
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Y
Y Combinator Blog

MIT Technology Review

Want to get a data center online quickly? Give it some flex. Why do South Koreans love AI so much? This man with ALS is “the first power user” of a brain implant that lets him speak The Download: cutting AC emissions, and nature’s drug designer These new solid-state ACs promise a cool future. Scientists aren’t so sure. The Download: “reprogramming” aging, and the hidden sense of interoception You do your own time Why “reprogramming” is the buzziest approach to reversing aging right now Inside interoception: The hidden sense of how you feel inside The Download: soccer’s data renaissance and China’s big nuclear plans Google DeepMind is worried about what happens when millions of agents start to interact Job titles of the future: Nature’s drug designer Inside soccer’s data renaissance Why China is betting on big nuclear reactors The Download: the “steroid olympics” and a safer Mythos The “steroid olympics” were a circus—and a window into our culture The Download: whole-body rejuvenation drugs and five things to know about AI Learning to lead in a hybrid human-AI enterprise David Sinclair plans to test whole-body rejuvenation drugs in the XPrize competition Five things you need to know about AI The Download: how the World Cup ball will fly and OpenAI’s “super app” Why this year’s World Cup ball may not fly as far The Download: AI hacking beyond Mythos, and chatbots’ impact on our brains Are AI chatbots making us lose control of our brains? The Meta hack shows there’s more to AI security than Mythos The Download: AI-generated lawsuits and virtual power plants for data centers How courts are coping with a flood of AI-generated lawsuits How virtual power plants could provide energy for data centers The Download: Trump’s new AI order, and smart glasses for warfare The Download: AI can run your admin department now
Redefining the future of software engineering
2026-04-15 · via MIT Technology Review

Software engineering has experienced two seismic shifts this century. First was the rise of the open source movement, which gradually made code accessible to developers and engineers everywhere. Second, the adoption of development operations (DevOps) and agile methodologies took software from siloed to collaborative development and from batch to continuous delivery. Now, a third such shift looks to be taking shape with the adoption of agentic AI in software engineering.

Thus far, engineering teams have mainly used AI to assist with coding, testing, and other individual tasks, within tightly designed parameters. But with agentic capabilities, AI agents become reasoning, self-directing entities that can manage not just discrete tasks but entire software projects—and do so largely autonomously. If adopted and fully embraced by engineering teams, agentic AI will usher in end-to-end software process automation and, ultimately, agent-managed development and product lifecycle automation.

This report, which is based on a survey of 300 engineering and technology executives, finds that software engineering teams are seeing the potential in agentic AI and are beginning to put it to use, but so far in a mainly limited fashion. Their ambitions for it are high, but most realize it will take time and effort to reduce the barriers to its full diffusion in software operations. As with DevOps and agile, reaping the full benefits of agentic AI in engineering will require sometimes difficult organizational and process change to accompany technology adoption. But the gains to be won in speed, efficiency, and quality promise to make any such pain well worthwhile.

Key findings include the following:

Adoption momentum is building. While half of organizations deem agentic AI a top investment priority for software engineering today, it will be a leading investment for over four-fifths in two years. That spending is driving accelerated adoption. Agentic AI is in (mostly limited) use by 51% of software teams today, and 45% have plans to adopt it within the next 12 months.

Early gains will be incremental. It will take time for software teams’ investments in agentic AI to start bearing fruit. Over the next two years, most expect the improvements from agent use to be slight (14%) or at best moderate (52%). But around one-third (32%) have higher expectations, and 9% think the improvements will be game changing.

Agents will accelerate time-to-market. The chief gains from agentic AI use over that two-year time frame will come from greater speed. Nearly all respondents (98%) expect their teams’ delivery of software projects from pilot to production to accelerate, with the anticipated increase in speed averaging 37% across the group.

The goal for most is full agentic lifecycle management. Teams’ ambitions for scaling agentic AI are high. Most aim for AI agents to be managing the product development and software development lifecycles (PDLC and SDLC) end to end relatively quickly. At 41% of organizations, teams aim to achieve this for most or all products in 18 months. That figure will rise to 72% two years from now, if expectations are met.

Compute costs and integration pose key early challenges. For all survey respondents—but especially in early-adopter verticals such as media and entertainment and technology hardware—integrating agents with existing applications and the cost of computing resources are the main challenges they face with agentic AI in software engineering. The experts we interviewed, meanwhile, emphasize the bigger change management difficulties teams will face in changing workflows.

Download the report

This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff. It was researched, designed, and written by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.