惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
月光博客
月光博客
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Vercel News
Vercel News
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 司徒正美
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
H
Help Net Security
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
L
LangChain Blog
罗磊的独立博客
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 聂微东
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 叶小钗
D
Docker

ashishb.net

A day in Luxembourg - the richest country in the world I was asked to install malware during a fake interview Book summary: Breakneck - China's quest to engineer the future by Dan Wang Book summary: How to Teach Your Baby to Read Book Summary: The Discontented Little Baby Book by Pamela Douglas Introducing Amazing Sandbox - run third-party tools and AI agents securely on your machine Why software outsourcing gets a bad reputation? Book summary: The Natural Baby Sleep Solution by Polly Moore A day in Antwerp, Belgium Journey of online influencers Two days in Brussels, Belgium Shortcuts - when we love them and when we don't A visit to Rakhigarhi Three days in overhyped Paris Empty Japan, crowded Tokyo The real lock-in in GitHub is not the code, but the stars 11-day Norwegian Breakaway East Caribbean cruise Sanskrit and Sri Lankan Air Force Use REST with Open API The Achilles heel of American capitalism Costa Rica in 4 days At a juice stall in Sri Lanka A short stay at Warsaw, Poland Best practices for using Python & uv inside Docker Two days in Vilnius, Lithuania How IntelliJ IDEs waste disk space Pregnancy Why there aren't many digital nomads from India Two days in Riga, Latvia To keep your machine secure, run third-party tools inside Docker
Book Summary: The half-life of Facts by Samuel Arbesman
Ashish Bhatia · 2023-07-17 · via ashishb.net

The Half-Life of Facts is a provocative book that makes us realize that a lot of facts that we believe are factually true get overturned over time. It gives several examples of facts that were later proven wrong or became more precise as our measurements and understanding improved.

Knowledge, like radioactivity, decays over time. In aggregate, we can talk about the half-life of the decay of knowledge.

  1. From 1912 to 1953, it was believed that humans had 48 chromosomes. Then the improved experimentation reduced it to 46!
  2. Doctors used to recommend smoking. Now, it is deadly!
  3. Meat used to be good to eat. Then became bad. And now, it is a matter of opinion.

A lot of scientific knowledge, especially that’s based on measurement, is meso-fact. It slowly changes over decades and centuries. For example, the number of elements in the periodic table. Or the number of planets in the solar system. The half-life of books in various fields ranges from ~13 years (Physics) to ~7 years (History).

Sometimes, as our technology improves, so do associated facts. For example, the thermal conductivity of Iron changed with our ability to produce a more pure form of Iron and our ability to measure its thermal conductivity more accurately. The Earth was flat then it became a sphere (~8 inches/mile curvature) and now it’s a spheroid (~7.97-8.03 inches/mile).

Measuring workers’ productivity leads to an increase in workers’ productivity! This is known as the Hawthorne Effect. This makes it harder to decide whether an intervention was genuinely beneficial.

Population plays an important role in discoveries and inventions. When the land bridge between Tasmania and Australia broke ~10,000 years ago, the small population of Tasmania slowly degraded technically over time.

Over time, the speed at which information spreads has gone up as well. In 1812, two weeks after the war between the United States and the British was over, the battle of New Orleans started as the news of the first war hadn’t reached New Orleans. In 1860, it took one week for California to learn about Lincoln’s election.

Sometimes, when the facts permeate society, it becomes harder to update them later. For example, the stereotypical dinosaur is known as Brontosaurus. It has now been linked to Apatosaurus. So, the name Brontosaurus is no longer the valid one but that’s what the public knows at large. Similarly, a calculation mistake made Spinach appear to have 35 mg/100 gm Iron even though it only has 3.5 mg/100 gm Iron, this mistake was corrected by the 1930s, but Spinach’s popular perception remains.

There is a lot of knowledge that is public but hidden. Scientists don’t know about it. Many ideas like “rich get richer” have been published many times in academic journals in unrelated fields such as preferential attached, Gibrat Law, and Matthew Effect. In 1988, a large medical demonstrated that Streptokinase treats heart attacks. However, if one looks at cumulative data starting from 1959, then by 1973 the same fact could have been established. However, most scientists were not combining their results with existing results as they weren’t even fully aware of them.

Facts go through phase transitions where they change rapidly. In 1953, by plotting past speed increases, US Air Force predicted that speed faster than Earth’s escape velocity was possible by 1957. And 1957 is when Sputnik went into orbit. So, such state transitions even though abrupt can be predicted from the past data. Looking at the data, the author predicted in 2010 that the first habitable planet will be discovered by 2013. It was discovered in 2010. Similarly, the author predicts that the P versus NP problem will be 53 years old in 2024 and has a high chance of being solved by then.

As our ability to measure improves, some facts can disappear entirely. There used to be Planet X, a placeholder for a planet that should have existed in the solar system. Calculated estimates of its mass kept going down. In 1901, it was 9 times the size of Earth, then 5 times (1909) then 2 times (1919). Over time, the consensus changed to the belief that planet X does not exist. This is a well-known issue in many fields and is known as The Decline Effect. Apart from better measurements, another factor that contributes to the decline effect is Publication Bias. “Statistics in the science of doing 20 experiments a year and publishing one false one in Nature”, is not merely a statement, it has been widely accepted that most research findings are false. Small studies have a higher likelihood of false outcomes. Another such bias that happens in Biology is Taxonomic bias, which is the bias towards studying creatures that humans are interested in or are easier to find.

Humans suffer from factual inertia, sometimes just to appear contrarian, and sometimes out of desire. Change blindness prevents us from noticing changes that might invalidate the facts that we know. One way to avoid this is to rely less on your memory and more on the Internet to find up-to-date information when required.