惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
GbyAI
GbyAI
IT之家
IT之家
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
博客园_首页
C
Check Point Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
美团技术团队
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
A
About on SuperTechFans
雷峰网
雷峰网
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
J
Java Code Geeks
B
Blog RSS Feed
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
G
Google Developers Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs

Proxmox Support Forum

[SOLVED] - Github Auth for Mirrors-Kernel Repo? [Automation] Mass migration tool for MS Win11/Server Proxmox GUI hang - not response is it possible to reject or quarantine spam based on conditions I set ? The PVENode task list in PVE9 is partially obscured due to the terminal font being too large. About 100% error reporting due to pveproxy.service hooks Kubernetes overlay networking breaks when upgrading from PVE 9.1 to PVE 9.2.3 Zentraler Speicher No space left on device Combine datastore and direct file archival to tape Kernel panic VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (0,0) sobald ein 7.x Kernel verwendet wird. How to migrate disk of a VM from one ZFS to another Windows Server 2025 fails to boot after PVE 9.2 / Linux 7.0 Kernel upgrade Cannot Install Proxmox on T610 Poweredge with H700 PERC card sdn Config. gateway not reachable How to safely change domain/FQDN? Welche Filterquote erreicht ihr? NFS Share status unknown on 2 of 5 nodes Can't connect to PVE9 consoles [solved] Can't connect to PVE9 consoles [solved] [SOLVED] - Use secondary network for PVE commands Created cluster, one node storage gone BUG: proxmox mail gateway FROM = null bypass spam filtering Moving existing PBS from VMWare workstation to PVE cluster Does eBGP SDN fabric support external peering? Bug: PDM 1.1 not recognizing valid license status Proxmox GUI hang - not response PVE crashes unexpectedly Proxmox Backup Server 4.2 released! Advice
NVME-of multipath inconsistency
invalid@exam · 2026-06-16 · via Proxmox Support Forum

Hi,

We are currently experiencing an issue with mounting NVMe-of-TCP multipath volumes : after restarting following the update to version 9.2, some shared volumes are no longer visible on one of our host.
In dmesg, we find errors such as "IDs don't match for shared namespace," even though the subsystems are properly connected.
We have tried "nvme disconnect all," "nvme discover," "nvme ns-rescan," etc., but nothing has worked.
We have been performing various analyses and haven't been able to find the source of the problem. The strangest thing is that another identical server (in terms of hardware and installation) does not have this issue.
Has anyone else encountered this problem?

Regards.

Hi @Freddy Lege ,
We have seen no issues in our testing with PVE 9.2 and Kernel 7. Perhaps you can expand with more details, i.e.:
- storage vendor you are using
- exact PVE versions (pveversion / pveversion -v
- how the connections were initially established
- exact error messages and boot sequence from the logs
- nvme list (from all hosts)
- nvme list subsys (from all hosts)
- ip configuration comparison across all hosts
- what exact steps were part of your analyses and what were the results

Given that PVE does not use proprietary connection methods to NVMe storage but rather standard Linux interfaces, have you contacted your storage vendor for help?

Cheers


Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox

Hi bbgeek17,

Indeed, my question lacked details ;)

I'm using the kernel's core NVMe-of-TCP multipath on my PVE 9.2 servers to mount volumes exported from HPE Alletra arrays.

But since my question, I've found the source of the problem, which was quite difficult to identify.

I have two active-active synchronized arrays. Some volumes are synchronized between the two arrays, while others are stored separately.

The problem stemmed from the fact that one of the arrays was promoted to master and exposed all paths to all volumes with its own NQN, this is normal for synchronized volumes because it ensures that clients only see a single volume, regardless of which array they access. The problem is that this master array also exposes the unsynchronized volumes of the other array, which in turn exposes them with its own NQN. This caused conflicts with identical NDSIDs and different NQNs, hence the mounting problems.

Thank you for answering my question.