惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 【当耐特】
月光博客
月光博客
Vercel News
Vercel News
D
Docker
I
InfoQ
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园 - 叶小钗
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
雷峰网
雷峰网
博客园 - 聂微东
小众软件
小众软件
Y
Y Combinator Blog
腾讯CDC
L
LangChain Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss

Proxmox Support Forum

[SOLVED] - Github Auth for Mirrors-Kernel Repo? [Automation] Mass migration tool for MS Win11/Server Proxmox GUI hang - not response is it possible to reject or quarantine spam based on conditions I set ? The PVENode task list in PVE9 is partially obscured due to the terminal font being too large. About 100% error reporting due to pveproxy.service hooks Kubernetes overlay networking breaks when upgrading from PVE 9.1 to PVE 9.2.3 Zentraler Speicher No space left on device Combine datastore and direct file archival to tape Kernel panic VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (0,0) sobald ein 7.x Kernel verwendet wird. How to migrate disk of a VM from one ZFS to another Windows Server 2025 fails to boot after PVE 9.2 / Linux 7.0 Kernel upgrade Cannot Install Proxmox on T610 Poweredge with H700 PERC card sdn Config. gateway not reachable How to safely change domain/FQDN? Welche Filterquote erreicht ihr? NFS Share status unknown on 2 of 5 nodes Can't connect to PVE9 consoles [solved] Can't connect to PVE9 consoles [solved] [SOLVED] - Use secondary network for PVE commands Created cluster, one node storage gone BUG: proxmox mail gateway FROM = null bypass spam filtering Moving existing PBS from VMWare workstation to PVE cluster Does eBGP SDN fabric support external peering? Bug: PDM 1.1 not recognizing valid license status Proxmox GUI hang - not response PVE crashes unexpectedly Proxmox Backup Server 4.2 released! Advice
Tool to get most cpu flags on common CPUs in a cluster?
invalid@exam · 2026-06-23 · via Proxmox Support Forum

I was messing around today with the CPU types that I'm telling QEMU to use.

My home lab is a couple of repurposed Ryzen CPUs:

1 x AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor (1 Socket)
1 x AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Graphics (1 Socket)

I've been looking at the CPU flags available across both CPUs to get the maximum I can out of this install - while still having compatible CPU types to enable live migration.

I threw in the `flags` line in /proc/cpuinfo on both systems into Claude, and it suggested the `EPYC-Rome` CPU type for guests. Turns out the 3700X doesn't have the `xsaves` flag, so it gave me a suggestion of using the following in `/etc/pve/virtual-guest/cpu-models.conf`:

Code:

cpu-model: ryzen-cluster-cpu
    reported-model EPYC-Rome
    flags -xsaves
    phys-bits host
    hidden 0

This gives all the features that are common between these CPU types - which also has AES-NI - which `x86-64-v3` doesn't seem to include.

As this seems to be a pretty useful feature to give a 'best case' CPU to the guests, is there a way to do this in PVE without having to go via claude? ie a way to define a 'best capabilities' CPU type for common use between cluster nodes?

Hi,

since Proxmox VE 9.2, the web interface features mangemement of custom CPU models, under Datacenter -> Custom CPU models.

It allows quick filtering and shows which features are supported per node, so creating a custom CPU model based on that should be only be a bit more than a few clicks.

Hope that helps!

Ah, I didn't see that at all.

That being said, I'm struggling to get my head around how it would actually function. I can see how to represent the information I already have - but I'm not sure how I would discover how to create this if I hadn't already used Claude to give me a custom definition.

ie, if I filter based on the 3700X cpu, I don't see the xsaves option - as that CPU doesn't support it - but the 5700G does support it. I can only see xsaves by looking at the CPU flags for the 5700G - where its still set as 'default'.

This seems very counter-productive and very easy to miss things. Even knowing what I was looking for was difficult to achieve.

I wonder if a wizard to add a new CPU definition could be a thing where you can select the nodes you want to make the feature group from, and it picks the closest preset with any custom requirements - such as me using EYPC-Rome - xsaves.

If there's very different CPUs in the cluster, I would expect the common CPU feature set might be greatly reduced - hence the target node selection path for working this out.