惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 【当耐特】
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
C
Check Point Blog
月光博客
月光博客
腾讯CDC
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园 - Franky
Vercel News
Vercel News
D
Docker
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
雷峰网
雷峰网
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
GbyAI
GbyAI
B
Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog

Proxmox Support Forum

[SOLVED] - Github Auth for Mirrors-Kernel Repo? [Automation] Mass migration tool for MS Win11/Server Proxmox GUI hang - not response is it possible to reject or quarantine spam based on conditions I set ? The PVENode task list in PVE9 is partially obscured due to the terminal font being too large. About 100% error reporting due to pveproxy.service hooks Kubernetes overlay networking breaks when upgrading from PVE 9.1 to PVE 9.2.3 Zentraler Speicher No space left on device Combine datastore and direct file archival to tape Kernel panic VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (0,0) sobald ein 7.x Kernel verwendet wird. How to migrate disk of a VM from one ZFS to another Windows Server 2025 fails to boot after PVE 9.2 / Linux 7.0 Kernel upgrade Cannot Install Proxmox on T610 Poweredge with H700 PERC card sdn Config. gateway not reachable How to safely change domain/FQDN? Welche Filterquote erreicht ihr? NFS Share status unknown on 2 of 5 nodes Can't connect to PVE9 consoles [solved] Can't connect to PVE9 consoles [solved] [SOLVED] - Use secondary network for PVE commands Created cluster, one node storage gone BUG: proxmox mail gateway FROM = null bypass spam filtering Moving existing PBS from VMWare workstation to PVE cluster Does eBGP SDN fabric support external peering? Bug: PDM 1.1 not recognizing valid license status Proxmox GUI hang - not response PVE crashes unexpectedly Proxmox Backup Server 4.2 released! Advice
dirty-bitmap status: existing bitmap was invalid and has ...
invalid@exam · 2026-06-23 · via Proxmox Support Forum

Hi,

I have a three node PVE cluster running with a few VMs.

One of them, I back up every two hours.

And every time the backup runs (and completes successfully) the dirty bitmap from the previous run is - allegedly - invalid and is cleared. And so the backup (currently shy of 600GiB) takes forever.

Since there are no errors, I have no idea where to start debugging this.

How can it be that the dirty bitmap is invalid every single time, after less than two hours?

Any ideas?

Thanks!

What type of backup are you running? As soon as the VM is stopped the dirty-bitmap will become invalid. A "stop mode" backup for example won't be able to use any dirty-bitmapping because it will stop the VM before each backup.

Snapshot and the VM has been up for several days without interruption.

fiona

Proxmox Staff Member

Hi,
is this only a single backup job or do you have multiple jobs to different targets (different namespace also counts!)? Please share the VM configuration and backup log on both Proxmox VE and PBS side, and the output of pveversion -v and
proxmox-backup-manager versions --verbose.

ah, yes. There are two backup jobs for this VM to different targets (I am in the process of migrating from my old PBS installation to a new one).

I have disabled one and will report back.

fiona

Proxmox Staff Member

ah, yes. There are two backup jobs for this VM to different targets (I am in the process of migrating from my old PBS installation to a new one).

Then it's expected, because the bitmap is only valid for a given target (and we don't save multiple bitmaps).

I have disabled one and will report back.

If it still doesn't work, something weird is going on.

The normal backup works.

Thanks for your help!

Then it's expected, because the bitmap is only valid for a given target (and we don't save multiple bitmaps).

Hi, and is it possible to do so? Save one bitmap by (pbs,namespace) couple?

More and more PVE users have multiple target PBS...

Regards,

Christophe.

More and more PVE users have multiple target PBS...

IMHO it's better to use PBS sync to copy backups from one PBS to another instead of doing backup of the VM multiple times, even if PVE could use multiple dirty-maps for a few PBS. Less load on source PVE, less load on VMs and you offload the responsibility of doing the second backup replica to the backup server.

Last edited:

IMHO it's better to use PBS sync to copy backups from one PBS to another instead of doing backup of the VM multiple times, even if PVE could use multiple dirty-maps for a few PBS. Less load on source PVE, less load on VMs and you offload the responsibility of doing the second backup replica to the backup server.

Well, it's also my point but some users asked for such a feature.

Even though this is an old thread, I think this is a great idea to support dirty-bitmaps per target: This would allow 2 (or more) completely separated and fully independent backups sets.