惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
D
Docker
IT之家
IT之家
博客园_首页
罗磊的独立博客
V
V2EX
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
美团技术团队
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
量子位
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
GbyAI
GbyAI
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - Franky
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Jina AI
Jina AI
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
C
Check Point Blog
月光博客
月光博客
G
Google Developers Blog
B
Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
爱范儿
爱范儿

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
No, You're Not Going to Lose Your Job to AI
Sapan Parikh · 2026-05-28 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

In 1905, a twenty-six-year-old patent clerk published four papers that broke physics wide open. Special relativity. The photoelectric effect. Brownian motion. E=mc². We call it the annus mirabilis… the miracle year.

That was 120 years ago. And I’ve always wondered: after those explosive early-twentieth-century discoveries, relativity, quantum mechanics, atomic theory, and what happened? It felt like a long silence.

Genius, National Geographic’s series on Einstein’s life, opens with young Einstein fighting with his father Hermann, who wants him to join the family engineering business. Albert refuses; he wants to understand the universe, not wire buildings.

The show ends with Einstein having the exact same argument, but now he’s the father. His son Hans Albert wants to be an engineer. Not a theorist. An engineer.

The irony is crushing. But Hans Albert wasn’t wrong, and neither was Hermann. By the time Hans Albert was choosing his career, the great theories had already been written. The world didn’t need more theory. It needed people who could apply it, who could take E=mc² and build nuclear energy, take quantum mechanics and build transistors and computers.

The miracle was over. The work had just begun.

Once that clicked for me, I started seeing it everywhere. History doesn’t move in a straight line of constant discovery. It moves in cycles:

A handful of years of revolutionary breakthroughs, followed by decades, sometimes centuries, of people figuring out what to do with those breakthroughs.

Think about electricity. The core discoveries: electromagnetic induction, the lightbulb, and alternating current happened in a relatively compressed window. But the application of electricity? That took generations. Transformers, transmission lines, power grids, utility poles, wiring standards, household appliances, and industrial machinery. Entire industries were born not from inventing electricity, but from deploying it.

Or take the theory of relativity itself. The theory was published in 1905 and refined by 1915. But the applications? Nuclear energy. Nuclear weapons. GPS satellites (which literally correct for relativistic time dilation). Medical imaging. Particle accelerators. These came over the next century and continue today.

Ten years of miracles. A hundred years of making it real.

Here’s what I find most interesting about these application years: they always create a job shift that feels catastrophic in the moment but looks obvious in hindsight.

When electricity arrived, the people who made candles lost their livelihoods. That was real. That was painful. But the people who laid wires, who built transformers, who installed streetlights, who manufactured motors — they found entirely new kinds of work that didn’t exist a generation before.

The candle maker couldn’t have imagined the job of “electrical engineer” because the category didn’t exist yet. And that’s exactly the kind of displacement that makes people anxious — not because the new jobs won’t come, but because you can’t see them from where you’re standing.

I think we’re living through a new miracle period right now. AI and Generative AI — these are this century’s relativity and quantum mechanics. The foundational theory is being written as we speak. And just like in 1905, the window of pure invention will be short compared to what comes after.

What comes after is the application era. Someone will reshape how hospitals handle diagnostics. Someone else will reinvent how students learn. Others will find uses in agriculture, law, construction — in places we can’t foresee, just like the candle maker couldn’t have imagined fiber-optic cable.

Yes, some jobs will go away. Every cycle has its casualties. But I’m deeply optimistic — because the people who understand how to apply AI will be the wire layers and electrical engineers of our generation. The pattern holds across every major technological cycle in history: more people gain than lose.

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?