惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
V
Visual Studio Blog
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - Franky
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 叶小钗
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 聂微东
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
V
V2EX
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园_首页
G
Google Developers Blog

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
GitHub - chafoo/anchored: Long autonomous AI coding runs ...
chafoo · 2026-06-25 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

Configure long, autonomous AI runs — plan → refine → build → wrap, on epics or tasks — with anchored evidence at every step.

Shape each step of your work — your tests, commits, gates, your tools — and anchor evidence to every implementation. With anchored, an AI can run for hours and you still trust the result: nothing reaches done without the proof to back it.

Same lifecycle at every scale — epic ▸ task ▸ phase. CLI-only, zero-install plugin, no MCP.

Why this exists

AI writes code faster than you can verify it.

On a long autonomous run, the app "works." Tests are green. PRs merge. And you still don't fully trust the result — because nobody can see why anything was built the way it was, or whether a passing test actually proves the thing it claims to.

Implementation runs at AI speed. Verification runs at human speed. That gap is the problem. Every line generated faster than it's proven becomes an obligation that comes back during review, debugging, and the next refactor.

Better prompts don't close the gap. A prompt is a request, not a guarantee — the agent can skip a criterion, lose track over a long run, or point at a test that doesn't actually prove anything, then write a summary that sounds verified.

anchored moves verification out of your discipline and into the system. A rule says "please do it this way." A boundary says "you cannot move forward until this is done." anchored is the boundary.

How it works

Every piece of work moves through the same four steps, and a criterion cannot reach done without attached evidence that an independent checker accepts.

Step What happens
plan The task is broken into phases with testable acceptance criteria. If a criterion can't be verified, it isn't a valid criterion.
refine The plan is checked against the real codebase and your project rules — gaps, bad assumptions, and soft criteria get caught before any code is written.
build Implementation happens phase by phase. A phase can't be marked done because the code compiles or a test is green — each criterion needs evidence, and that evidence is validated. Insufficient proof or a rule violation → the step is rejected.
wrap The run is summarized. Verification already happened during the run; wrap just rolls up what was proven.

The key move: the agent that writes the code is not the one that decides whether it's proven. An independent instance evaluates each criterion — what was required, what changed, which check proves it, whether the evidence is sufficient, whether a rule was violated. Evidence is structured state, not prose. The whole workflow lives in a versioned anchored.yml at the repo root, so the process is reviewable and the same for everyone on the team — not trapped in one person's head or a chat history.

Quick start

In Claude Code:

/plugin marketplace add chafoo/anchored
/plugin install a@anchored

Not on the official Claude Code marketplace yet — this adds the GitHub repo (chafoo/anchored) as a marketplace source. An official listing is the next step.

Then in any project:

/a:plan <describe an epic, a task, or a phase>   # the tier is an argument of plan
/a:refine <slug>                                  # ground the plan + Q&A walk + gates
/a:build <slug>                                   # implement + verify, phase by phase
/a:wrap <slug>                                     # review + summary (+ epic roll-up)

The CLI ships inside the plugin — Claude Code puts plugin/bin/ on PATH for you, in the main session and in subagents. No npm i -g, no MCP setup.

Docs

The docs hub is docs/:

  • Guide — the one-page on-ramp: the idea, the lifecycle, and the runnable kata
  • CLI API — every anchored <tier> <verb> [slug] command and the /a:* skills
  • Tier portraits — epic · task · phase, and what each one is for
  • Lifecycle stages — setup · plan · refine · build · wrap

Contribute

git clone https://github.com/chafoo/anchored
cd anchored/core
bun install
bun run test     # the spec-coverage gate + unit + e2e + int suites
bun run build    # tsc → dist/ (Node-compatible artifact)

Status

Pre-1.0 — the v3 architecture is built and dogfood-validated; APIs may still shift. Tier model epic ▸ task ▸ phase, plugin namespace a. Not yet on the official Claude Code marketplace — install via the GitHub repo as a source (see Quick start). The engine also lives in core/ as a standalone package (not yet published); the plugin bundles the CLI, so users never need it.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.


Built by @chafoo.