- Article
- Published:
- Anil Palepu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-87872 na2,
- Wei-Hung Weng ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-03902,
- Khaled Saab ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-04691,
- David Stutz1,
- Yong Cheng1,
- Kavita Kulkarni2,
- S. Sara Mahdavi1,
- Joëlle Barral1,
- Dale R. Webster ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-88242,
- Katherine Chou2,
- Avinatan Hassidim2,
- Yossi Matias ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-60022,
- James Manyika2,
- Ryutaro Tanno ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-67301,
- Vivek Natarajan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-20742,
- Adam Rodman2,
- Tao Tu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-79381,
- Alan Karthikesalingam ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-4958-59762 na1 &
- …
- Mike Schaekermann ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-96802 na1
Nature (2026) Cite this article
We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Subjects
Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue1, their capabilities for effective management reasoning—including disease progression, therapeutic response, and safe medication prescription—remain under-explored. We advance the previously demonstrated diagnostic capabilities of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE)1−3 through a new LLM-based agentic system optimized for multi-visit clinical management and dialogue. To ground its reasoning in authoritative clinical knowledge, AMIE leverages Gemini’s long-context capabilities4, combining in-context retrieval with structured reasoning to align its output with up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and drug formularies. In a randomized, blinded virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) study, AMIE was compared to 21 primary care physicians (PCPs) across 100 multi-visit case scenarios designed to reflect UK NICE Guidance and BMJ Best Practice guidelines. AMIE was non-inferior to PCPs in management reasoning as assessed by specialists and scored better in both preciseness of treatments and investigations, and in its alignment with and grounding in clinical guidelines. To benchmark medication reasoning, we developed RxQA, a multiple-choice question benchmark derived from two national drug formularies (US, UK) and validated by board-certified pharmacists. Though AMIE and PCPs both benefited from the ability to access external drug information, AMIE outperformed PCPs on higher difficulty questions. While further research would be needed before real-world translation, AMIE’s strong performance across evaluations marks a significant step towards conversational AI as a tool in disease management.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
27,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
185,98 € per year
only 3,58 € per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (download PDF )
Supplementary discussion, methods and results (Sections 1-16). Contains related work, details on the system design for the Mx agent and Dialogue agent, details on the OSCE evaluation study (inter-rater reliability analysis, clinician metadata, scenario metadata, ablation analysis), and methods details and further results for the RxQA medication reasoning benchmark.
Reporting Summary (download PDF )
Supplementary Data 1 (download PDF )
Detailed view of two sample scenarios with AMIE and PCP output and evaluation gradings. Full details for two sample scenarios used in the OSCE evaluation study, including scenario information, AMIE-patient-actor conversations, PCP-patient-actor conversations, specialist physician gradings and patient actor gradings for all three visits per scenario.
Supplementary Data 2 (download PDF )
Details for all 120 OSCE scenarios with AMIE output (PDF). Scenario details and AMIE output for all 120 scenarios used either in the OSCE evaluation study (100) or for validation purposes (20), in human-readable PDF format.
Supplementary Data 3 (download CSV )
Details for all 120 OSCE scenarios with AMIE output (CSV). Scenario details and AMIE output for all 120 scenarios used either in the OSCE evaluation study (100) or for validation purposes (20), in machine-readable CSV format.
Peer Review File (download PDF )
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liévin, V., Palepu, A., Weng, WH. et al. Towards Conversational AI for Disease Management. Nature (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10764-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10764-5





























