Law firms and their clients increasingly rely on AI to draft disclosures, summarize documents, and prepare for litigation. Given this widespread use and popularity, AI-related issues have unsurprisingly begun to feature prominently in recent securities cases. These issues range from allegations of “AI washing” and overstated AI capabilities to disputes over whether clients’ use of generative AI tools can be shielded by the attorney-client privilege.
10 minute read May 26, 2026 at 09:59 AM
By
Jay Dubow , Erica H. Dressler and Milica Krnjaja
L-R: Jay A. Dubow, Erica H. Dressler and Millie Krnjaja of Troutman Pepper Locke. Courtesy photos
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have quickly become integral to users across the spectrum, from large public companies to individual consumers. Public companies now routinely reference “AI-driven” strategies on earnings calls, and boards are being briefed on AI risks alongside cybersecurity and ESG.
A Subscription is Required to Access this Content. Subscribe to Law.com today for:
Exclusive Reporting - Fast, authoritative coverage and sharp analysis.
Integrated Insights - Compass and Radar context built right into articles.
Personalized Experience - Tailored homepage content and curated newsletters.
Smart Search & Alerts - Powerful search and real‑time updates.
Already a subscriber? Log In.
Questions about group subscriptions? Contact an Account Specialist at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)
L-R: Jay A. Dubow, Erica H. Dressler and Millie Krnjaja of Troutman Pepper Locke. Courtesy photos