惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Vercel News
Vercel News
博客园 - 司徒正美
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
V
Visual Studio Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
小众软件
小众软件
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
美团技术团队
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 聂微东
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
罗磊的独立博客
The Cloudflare Blog
V
V2EX
月光博客
月光博客
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Y
Y Combinator Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 【当耐特】
T
Tailwind CSS Blog

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
Rails Security, AI, and IBB
riffraff · 2026-05-07 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

For quite a few years the Rails project has been working with the Internet Bug Bounty (IBB). The IBB is an organization that awarded cash to security researchers that reported issues to OSS projects participating in the IBB. For quite a while I wasn’t certain about my feelings toward the program because I felt like cash rewards could incentivize low quality reports as well as encourage reporters to “haggle” about the severity of a particular bug (the IBB paid more when the bug was more severe). In the beginning that certainly was the case. We were fielding many low quality reports, and people were haggling over severity. But the program evolved, and despite the never-ending haggling, I felt it did more good (rewarding security researchers) than bad (forcing the security team to wade through low quality reports).

That is, until AI came along. Sometime in 2025 our team started getting inundated with low quality AI generated reports. I know for sure this wasn’t unique to just our team as well. Anyway, AI lowered the barrier to generate reports, so we were back in the era of wading through low quality reports. Only this time, the low quality reports were masquerading as high quality reports. AI made it easy to turn a bullshit problem into something that looked legit, and since there’s a possibility of money involved people tried to take advantage of the situation.

We even had a report where someone forgot to delete the AI generated output and just uploaded the report as-is with the following text:

## ✅ READY TO SUBMIT!

*All information prepared for professional Rails bug bounty submission.*

*Expected Outcome:*

Rails Team Response: 1-2 weeks
Fix Development: 2-8 weeks
Security Release: 8-12 weeks
IBB Bounty: $1,040-1,600 (80% of $1,300-2,000)


*Next Step:* Copy information above into HackerOne form and submit!

I enjoy using AI, but I really don’t like AI being used on me. But that’s not what this post is about.

Recently the IBB stopped accepting new submissions. In other words, they aren’t paying bounties to security researchers anymore. I don’t know for sure since I haven’t asked them directly, but I suspect this is due to so many projects being inundated with AI generated reports.

I think putting a stop to bounties makes sense for the time being. Of course the downside is that legitimate researchers are no longer incentivized to report bugs to OSS projects. Finally, the Rails team didn’t actually handle paying out any of the bounties. After we accept and release fixes, the IBB took care of the bounties and we had no visibility into that process. Since the IBB has stopped accepting new submissions and paying bounties, we’re now tasked with playing customer support for IBB as many reporters are now asking us “are we getting paid?”

I honestly don’t know what to make of this situation except that working in OSS security will always find new and interesting ways to suck. I don’t have any particular “call to action” for this post, but I hope that it gives people some kind of glimpse into how the tofu is made.

Anyway, have a good day, and remember: It’s always Friday somewhere!