惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

腾讯CDC
The Cloudflare Blog
IT之家
IT之家
V
V2EX
雷峰网
雷峰网
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园 - Franky
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
GbyAI
GbyAI
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 叶小钗
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
C
Check Point Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
B
Blog
月光博客
月光博客
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
Core vs Non-Core Work in the Age of AI
probe · 2026-05-07 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

Welcome to new subscribers from VC Whisper (my latest experiment in automating venture). Parth’s Playground are one-off essays on topics I’m thinking through (see here and here). Enjoy!

The real risk of AI isn’t that it takes our jobs. It’s that we’ve been wrong about what our jobs actually are.

There is a lot of anxiety around how AI is going to affect work. My current mental model is the following:

  1. AI is very good at automating non-core work.

  2. AI also helps augment core work.

  3. The challenge is what we think is core work, may just be non-core.

——

Chess was solved decades ago. Magnus can’t beat the chess engine running on a flip phone. Yet chess is more popular than ever, and we all still follow Magnus. Why?

Turns out the core work for Magnus is not to solve the game of chess.

It’s actually to provide entertainment and inspiration to other humans by showing what he can do.

A machine can play 20 blind games simultaneously. But we are awed when Magnus does it as a human. His core work is the masterful display of pushing the limits of focus and creativity within the constraints of human biology.

——

A VP recently told me that his most nihilistic engineers re: AI were the ones who saw coding as a means to solve puzzles. The ones who viewed coding as a means to solve problems were ecstatic.

My interpretation is that the former category – the puzzle solvers – misunderstood the core work for this specific role.

At most companies, software engineering is not meant to solve puzzles. The goal —for better or worse — is to achieve business outcomes.

Writing code is becoming non-core. The core work is building the right thing, in the right way. And arguably it has always been that.

AI can help augment this core work as a brainstorming partner. But there’s a lot of context – how it fits into an org, who gets promoted with a purchase, the life of a user – that the AI can’t do yet. The core work is moving up, to system design, agent management, internal teamwork and spending more time with users to achieve real outcomes.

Rest assured, like chess, puzzle solver coders won’t die out. Tournaments will still exist. We will still be in awe of the IMO/IOI winners. In fact, I think interest in it will actually increase, similar to chess. There will just be fewer puzzle solvers at companies.

——

My mom is a teacher. A lot of what she spends her time on is what I’d call non-core. It’s creating curriculums, grading, etc. AI can and should automate this work.

Her core work right now includes helping her students deeply learn about a topic. What’s interesting is that in the near term, even this may not be her core work. Your AI could help you learn in an even more personalized way.

Are teachers all going to disappear? Absolutely not.

When I think back to my favorite teachers and professors, it wasn’t necessarily the information they shared with me that was the most meaningful. I barely remember the content today.

Instead it was how they contextualized that information, how they made it relatable to my life, how they made me feel, and how they helped draw curiosities and spark new connections for me. Their core work was to use their subject matter as a vehicle to help me grow as a person.

That is not going to change.

A recent and one of many notes my mom receives from students. I’m a proud son.

——

A lot of doomer takes assume that all core work will be automated. And then there will be nothing to do.

I strongly disagree with this.

First, as mentioned above, work tends to just move up one level. Farmers used to just farm. Now their core work is managing agents (aka tractors), hedging with futures, figuring out what to plant, etc. This will happen to all jobs across all industries.

Second, humans will just make up new jobs. We want social connection. Human desire is infinite and biologically innate.

X avatar for @pchopra28

Parth Chopra@pchopra28

@jeremygiffon @SP1NS1R as long human biological makeup doesn't change we will always have infinite cravings/desire. Including wanting to do something for fulfillment and we will make up jobs to serve that for ourselves and each other

8:18 PM · Feb 13, 2026 · 397 Views

1 Reply · 1 Repost · 1 Like

We’re in a rapidly changing world. Not dissimilar to the fog of war during the covid years. And so we need to re-invent how we do things.

This is a GOOD thing. Don’t fall into the AGI depression. It can and will be fun. And before we know it, we’ll wonder how we ever did things the old way.

——

No posts