惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
月光博客
月光博客
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
IT之家
IT之家
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
A
About on SuperTechFans
Vercel News
Vercel News
P
Proofpoint News Feed
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
博客园 - 【当耐特】
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
V
Visual Studio Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
Training our own AI models - PostHog
tartieret · 2026-05-28 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

I really think we're on the verge of some of our best work through the next six months.

Over the past year, we've started building more AI-powered features into PostHog, like our AI installation wizard, PostHog AI, and our MCP. They're all wildly popular, but they're only the start.

PostHog's next chapter is about building more proactive, self-driving products. Products that surface answers and solutions for you, act on them, and improve over time.

This is the vision for PostHog Code, which is now in beta. To enable this and more products like it, we want to try something new.

We want to train models on data in PostHog.

We have two goals here:

  1. Make our existing products smarter, more proactive, and useful to you
  2. Build entirely new products, like PostHog Code, that help teams build better products, faster

The first area we're interested in is session replay analysis. PostHog AI can already detect issues in replays, but it's expensive and doesn't scale well. We want replays to be as powerful at scale as they are for diagnosing the problems of individual users, and we think a model trained on the underlying data that powers replays will help us achieve this.

Another idea I'm especially excited about is synthetic user testing – i.e. using our knowledge of user behavior to identify when users might get confused, or what flows might break, before you ship to production. As coding models improve, many people are seeing test and review workload increase hugely. We want to automate this, so you can focus on your product.

And, if we can get better at predicting user behavior, we should be able to suggest changes that will improve conversion, and reduce user frustration, for features you've already shipped as well. If we can automate this work for you, you'll spend less time on manual analysis and burn fewer tokens in the process.

Our ideas here are experimental. It will take iteration to figure out how to train models effectively, and what data is actually useful. But, so far, every time we've added AI in a way that makes the product simpler or more powerful, it's worked well, so we think it's worth trying.

We've spent a lot of time thinking about this from a user perspective, especially the tradeoffs.

The upside is the kinds of improvements described above.

Most tools are focused on providing you with the best code; we want to focus our energy into making your product the best it can be. This is why we describe PostHog Code as a product editor.

The downside is that this involves using data in PostHog to train models.

Most companies would bury this change in a deceptively boring T&Cs update, but we value transparency, so here's what you need to know in an internet-friendly numbered list:

  1. Users on our EU cloud instance are opted out by default
  2. So too users with agreements that prevent training (e.g. BAA, MSA, or similar)
  3. All other users on our US cloud instance are opted in by default
  4. We will anonymize all data before it's used for training
  5. We will only use data that already exists in your PostHog instance
  6. We will do all the model training ourselves, which means...
  7. We won't sell or send your data to third-party model providers
  8. You can opt out at any time via your org settings in PostHog (admin access required)
  9. Training won't start until June 29, so there's plenty of time to decide

In terms of comms, we are:

  • Emailing all our customers and making it super obvious what the email is about
  • Notifying all our users through in-app notifications (in case you don't read emails)
  • Communicating our plans very publicly (like in this post)

I want to stress that our goal here is to improve PostHog as a product for our customers, not to expose or sell models trained on your data, or monetize your data.

Put simply, because otherwise we will not have enough data to train a model that's actually useful.

If you choose to opt out, the new features that we're building with these models won't be available to you, as they'll depend on this data.

If you're opted out by default (e.g. because you're on our EU cloud instance), you can choose to opt in manually provided any legal agreements you have with us don't exclude this option.

We're choosing to be upfront about this rather than quietly rolling something out, because we think that's the right way to do it.

If you want to talk about this, I'm james at you can guess it.

We're also hiring AI researchers, so get in touch if you want to work on this with us.