惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
P
Proofpoint News Feed
G
Google Developers Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 叶小钗
C
Check Point Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
月光博客
月光博客
美团技术团队
D
Docker
博客园 - Franky
Y
Y Combinator Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
博客园 - 【当耐特】
罗磊的独立博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
Polish Nobel literature laureate Tokarczuk sparks controv...
amarant · 2026-05-24 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

Keep our news free from ads and paywalls by making a donation to support our work!

Notes from Poland is run by a small editorial team and is published by an independent, non-profit foundation that is funded through donations from our readers. We cannot do what we do without your support.

Polish author Olga Tokarczuk, who won the 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature, has sparked controversy and criticism after revealing that she uses artificial intelligence (AI) to help develop her ideas.

Following the backlash, Tokarczuk released a statement suggesting that her remarks had been “incorrectly understood” and confirming that she did not use AI to write her forthcoming novel, which will be released later this year.

Olga Tokarczuk o tym jak wspomaga się AI przy pisaniu książki.

A potem gada o tym, że szkoda, że takie czasy nastały:(( pic.twitter.com/6qwb3ORg5m

— HIB HOB XD (@HibHobXD) May 18, 2026

The comments in question came during an appearance last week by Tokarczuk at Impact’26, a major conference of leading political, business and cultural figures held in the Polish city of Poznań.

She discussed how her upcoming novel would probably be her last, because the amount of time needed to write such a work makes it not worthwhile “from a purely economic perspective”, according to a transcript of the talk. She said she would instead focus on writing short stories.

Tokarczuk then suggested that “perhaps a symbiotic future and cooperation with artificial intelligence will help” authors in the future. “In fluid literary fiction, this technology is an asset of incredible proportions,” she said. “Despite fears, I believe that we writers, due to the specific nature of our craft, are most attuned to tools like AI.”

“I bought myself the highest, most advanced version of one [AI] language model, and I’m often deeply shocked by how it so fantastically broadens and deepens my creative thinking,” said Tokarczuk. “Often I just throw an idea to the machine for analysis with the request: ‘Darling, how could we develop this beautifully?'”

The author admitted that, “when I was writing my latest novel, which will be released this autumn, I asked this advanced model what songs my characters might have danced to at a dance several decades ago”.

She said that it had given her a few suggestions, one of which contained a clear mistake in the name. “You have to be careful of hallucinations,” said Tokarczuk.

More broadly, despite her praise for AI, the author said that she “feels a poignant, very human sorrow for an era that is disappearing forever”.

“My heart aches for the passing of traditional literature, written over months in solitude, a work of life crafted in the mind of a fully conscious, single individual,” said Tokarczuk. “I don’t believe that any modern chatbot will ever be able to speak in such an exquisite way.”

The Nobel Laureate Olga Tokarczuk’s recent comments on her use of AI in ‘preliminary research’ have hit a nerve – and rightly so, says Helen Charman https://t.co/JVUsl0NBly

— ArtReview_ (@ArtReview_) May 20, 2026

Tokarczuk’s comments prompted criticism from many commentators online and also some other Polish writers.

Szczepan Twardoch, winner of the 2021 EBRD Literature Prize and another speaker at Impact’26, wrote in a statement on Facebook (which did not mention Tokarczuk directly) that he “would have to lose my mind to use a language model in this worthy and noble pursuit of literature”.

“Entering into a ‘relationship’ with a language model, whether emotional or creative, makes about as much sense as marrying a vibrator,” he added.

However, Tokarczuk was defended by writer Ziemowit Szczerek, who criticised the “moral outrage” over her remarks. “I don’t understand why Olga Tokarczuk can’t have some fun with it [AI] if she wants to,” he wrote.

In response to the backlash, Tokarczuk released a statement on social media clarifying her views. “Like any other conversation, remarks made before a live audience at a public event can be incorrectly understood,’ she wrote.

“I make use of artificial intelligence on the same principles as most people in the world – I treat it as a tool that allows faster documenting and checking of facts,” said Tokarczuk. “Whenever I use this tool I additionally verify the information.”

“None of my texts, including the novel that will appear in Polish this fall, has been written with the help of artificial intelligence – except for using it as a tool for faster preliminary research,” she continued.


Notes from Poland is run by a small editorial team and published by an independent, non-profit foundation that is funded through donations from our readers. We cannot do what we do without your support.

Main image credit: Harald Krichel/Wikimedia Commons (under CC BY-SA 4.0)