View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Ensemble classifiers are predictive models that combine the results of simpler base models, often by majority vote. A classic example is random forests, which combine the predictions of decision trees. Ensembles that use more base models can be more accurate but also more costly to train and run. In this paper, we consider strategies for reducing the computational cost of binary classification using an approach from the field of sequential testing. Rather than evaluating all the base models and taking a majority vote, we evaluate the base models sequentially and stop execution when a clear majority emerges. We consider three different notions of optimality for early-stopping strategies that minimize the number of base models executed while controlling the rate of disagreement with the full ensemble. For each notion of optimality and allowable disagreement rate, we show that a linear program can be constructed and solved efficiently to find the optimal stopping strategy. We tested these methods on real-world datasets taken from the UC Irvine Machine Learning repository, and on the benchmark datasets proposed by Grinsztajn et al. We found that on most datasets, these methods provide speed-ups of 4x or more while controlling disagreement at 0.1%

Submission history

From: Joseph Kalman [view email]
[v1] Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:32:52 UTC (2,550 KB)