惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

雷峰网
雷峰网
博客园 - 聂微东
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
罗磊的独立博客
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
博客园_首页
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 叶小钗
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
量子位
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
Jina AI
Jina AI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - Franky
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org

Memory-Guided Trust-Region Bayesian Optimization (MG-TuRBO) for High Dimensions EngageTriBoost: Predictive Modeling of User Engagement in Digital Mental Health Intervention Using Explainable Machine Learning Reservoir observer enhanced with residual calibration and attention mechanism Efficient RL Training for LLMs with Experience Replay Wireless Communication Enhanced Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Sensor Errors for Safe and Robust Wind Turbine Fleet Control IKKA: Inversion Classification via Critical Anomalies for Robust Visual Servoing Adaptive Simulation Experiment for LLM Policy Optimization EvoLen: Evolution-Guided Tokenization for DNA Language Model Smartwatch-Based Sitting Time Estimation in Real-World Office Settings Structural Evaluation Metrics for SVG Generation via Leave-One-Out Analysis Loom: A Scalable Analytical Neural Computer Architecture Spectral Geometry of LoRA Adapters Encodes Training Objective and Predicts Harmful Compliance Finite-Sample Analysis of Nonlinear Independent Component Analysis:Sample Complexity and Identifiability Bounds How does Chain of Thought decompose complex tasks? Uncertainty-Aware Transformers: Conformal Prediction for Language Models Adaptive Candidate Point Thompson Sampling for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Using Synthetic Data for Machine Learning-based Childhood Vaccination Prediction in Narok, Kenya Delve into the Applicability of Advanced Optimizers for Multi-Task Learning Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoning Multi-Agent Decision-Focused Learning via Value-Aware Sequential Communication Predictive Entropy Links Calibration and Paraphrase Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Models Efficient Hierarchical Implicit Flow Q-learning for Offline Goal-conditioned Reinforcement Learning Modality-Aware Zero-Shot Pruning and Sparse Attention for Efficient Multimodal Edge Inference The nextAI Solution to the NeurIPS 2023 LLM Efficiency Challenge Feature-Label Modal Alignment for Robust Partial Multi-Label Learning Integrated electro-optic attention nonlinearities for transformers Toward World Models for Epidemiology Tracing the Chain: Deep Learning for Stepping-Stone Intrusion Detection Batch Distillation Data for Developing Machine Learning Anomaly Detection Methods
Learning Large-Scale Modular Addition with an Auxiliary M...
Hanato Kikuc · 2026-05-11 · via cs.LG updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Learning parity functions, more general modular addition, is a challenging machine learning task due to its input sensitivity. A recent study substantially scaled modular addition learning in both the number of summands and the modulus. Its key idea is to increase zeros in training sequences, reducing the effective number of summands and thus controlling training difficulty; however, this induces covariate shift between training and test input distributions. This study theoretically and empirically analyzes this side effect and proposes a covariate-shift-free method for modular addition. Specifically, we introduce an auxiliary modulus $Kq$ during training, which reduces wrap-around frequency and problem difficulty while preserving the same input distribution across training and testing. Experiments show strong scalability and sample efficiency: even for large input length $N$, large modulus $q$, and small datasets -- where the sparse method fails to learn -- our method achieves equal or better match accuracy and relaxed $\tau$-accuracy. For example, at $N=64$ and $q=974269$, our method trained on 100K samples achieves $97.0\%$ $\tau$-accuracy at $\tau=0.05$, while the sparse method achieves only $9.5\%$ with the same data size and $93.9\%$ even when extended to 1M samples.
Comments: 10+11 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.07648 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2605.07648v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.07648

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hiroshi Kera [view email]
[v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 12:16:07 UTC (421 KB)