






















Authors:Bart Baesens, Andreas Goethals, Stefan Lessmann, Simon De Vos, Cristián Bravo, David Martens, Victor Medina-Olivares, Christophe Mues, Maria Oskarsdóttir, Seppe vanden Broucke, Tim Verdonck, Wouter Verbeke
Abstract:Predictive models play a pivotal role in credit risk management, guiding critical decisions through accurate estimation of default probabilities and losses. Extensive research has introduced new modeling techniques, complemented by large-scale benchmarking studies consolidating the state-of-the-art. Today, quasi-standards such as gradient-boosting models paired with SHAP explainers have emerged, yet continuous improvement of risk models remains a top priority. Concurrently, rapid advancements in AI, most notably large language models, have disrupted predictive modeling paradigms. Foundation models, pretrained on extensive datasets from diverse domains, have demonstrated remarkable performance by leveraging prior knowledge. While prevalent in natural language processing and computer vision, foundation models for tabular data have only recently emerged. We conjecture that pretraining on out-of-domain data is particularly beneficial in small-data settings, such as SME lending or specialized corporate portfolios, and may help address longstanding challenges including low default portfolios and class imbalance. This paper benchmarks recently proposed tabular foundation models against a broad set of competitors, including established and advanced machine learning techniques, across two core tasks: PD and LGD modeling. Our evaluation encompasses various datasets, performance indicators, and experimental conditions. We find that tabular foundation models generally perform best across datasets and tasks. Moreover, they offer significant improvement in predictive performance as dataset size shrinks. These results are remarkable given that the models are tested out-of-the-box, without hyperparameter tuning, ensuring ease of use and mitigating computational costs.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.18147 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.18147v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.18147 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
From: Wouter Verbeke [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 18 May 2026 09:52:48 UTC (268 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。