View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Learning chaotic dynamical systems from data requires more than short-term predictive accuracy: the learned model must preserve the attractor geometry and its invariant statistics. Trajectory (zero-order) and Jacobian (first-order) matching supervise the values and tangent structure of the vector field, but neither constrains how the field bends away from its tangent plane. A model can thus match values and tangents at the supervised states yet curve differently from the truth, remaining locally accurate while drifting toward spurious attractors and distorting long-time statistics. We show that enforcing second-order consistency mitigates these failures, but forming the full Hessian is prohibitive in high dimensions. We propose model-constrained randomized Jacobian matching, which compares the Jacobians of the true and learned vector fields at randomly perturbed inputs. A Taylor expansion shows that the expected randomized Jacobian loss decomposes into the nominal Jacobian mismatch plus a Hessian mismatch scaled by the noise variance, implicitly enforcing second-order consistency at $\mathcal{O}(d^2)$ cost without forming the $\mathcal{O}(d^3)$ Hessian tensor. Using only Jacobian evaluations, the method scales to high dimensions where explicit Hessian matching does not. Numerical experiments confirm that second-order methods are robust. For Lorenz~63, first-order methods produce catastrophic Lyapunov-exponent outliers under minimal temporal supervision, which second-order methods eliminate while recovering the correct attractor. For coupled Lorenz~96, an out-of-distribution forcing sweep separates the methods: all agree up to $F=16$, but beyond $F=18$ only second-order methods preserve the invariant measure and Lyapunov spectrum. On both systems, randomized Jacobian matching performs comparably to explicit Hessian matching at much lower cost.

Submission history

From: Shinhoo Kang [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Jun 2026 02:50:42 UTC (9,412 KB)