
























Abstract:Development of modern deep learning methods has been driven primarily by the push for improving model efficacy (accuracy metrics). This sole focus on efficacy has steered development of large-scale models that require massive computational resources, and results in considerable energy consumption and corresponding carbon footprint across the model lifecycle. In this work, we explore how physics inductive biases can offer useful trade-offs between model efficacy and model efficiency (compute, energy, and carbon). We study models with strong, weak, and no physics-inductive biases for spatio-temporal forecasting of incompressible shear flow, a task governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. We find that models with stronger physics priors achieve substantially lower training footprints, but this advantage does not straightforwardly extend to inference, highlighting the importance of evaluating carbon costs across the full model lifecycle rather than any single stage. We argue that model efficiency, along with model efficacy, should become a core consideration driving machine learning model development and deployment.
| Comments: | Source code available at this https URL |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2509.24517 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2509.24517v2 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.24517 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
From: Sophia Wilson [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 09:34:53 UTC (11,078 KB)
[v2]
Thu, 21 May 2026 08:12:13 UTC (5,026 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。