























Abstract:Statistical inference in observational science typically relies on a fundamental assumption: as sample size increases and uncertainties decrease, the inferred results should converge to the true physical quantities. This assumption underpins the notion that big data lead to more reliable conclusions. In Galactic archaeology, stellar ages inferred from spectroscopic surveys are widely used to reconstruct the formation history of the Milky Way disk. The age metallicity relation (AMR) and its derived formation timescale are often regarded as key physical diagnostics of early disk evolution. This interpretation carries an implicit premise: that observational quality does not introduce systematic bias into age inference. Here we show that this premise may fail. Using a large sample of subgiant stars, we identify a region in the observational quality parameter space (signal-to-noise ratio and parallax precision) where the inferred formation timescale exhibits a systematic offset of 0.5-1 Gyr relative to an independent asteroseismic reference, while the statistical uncertainties remain small, thus producing a stable-but-wrong inference state.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2604.27368 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2604.27368v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.27368 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
From: Zhipeng Zhang [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:30:05 UTC (3,279 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。