It might be a false warning from checkrebuild, because rider works without issues for me anyway.

@harre are you sure that this is actually an issue? As far as I can tell these are both container in the package itself, so maybe they have a custom launch script setting LD_PRELOAD or similar:

$ pacman -F libselinux.so.1                          
custom/rider-eap 1:242.20224.285-1 [installed]
    opt/rider-eap/plugins/remote-dev-server/selfcontained/lib/libselinux.so.1
$ pacman -F libcrypto.so.10               
custom/rider-eap 1:242.20224.285-1 [installed]
    opt/rider-eap/plugins/remote-dev-server/selfcontained/lib/libcrypto.so.10

There seems to be some dependancy hell.

checkrebuild -v
foreign rider-eap

ldd /opt/rider-eap/plugins/remote-dev-server/selfcontained/bin/Xvfb

    libselinux.so.1 => not found
    libcrypto.so.10 => not found

Rider 2023.3 EAP 6 is now avalible

On Windows it installs the EAP side-by-side.

So I think it's good to allow the same. Also is something is not working in EAP you can verify it's working in regular version easier. Also when testing something they have fixed in the new version.

Hey @C_Schmidtpeter, thanks for reporting that!

I undid the change with regard to the package conflicts=(...). The reason on why I added that was that the two things are the same upstream code, so to my understanding rider-eap could change settings of rider and other things could go wrong, but I guess it cannot go more wrong than before.

Regarding the Co-Maintainership: Lets get in contact via E-mail or IRC :)

@gromit: In /usr/bin/ you also need to undo your rename of rider-eap to rider. Could you do that too, please, or could you please make me sub-maintainer? Not being able to install rider and rider-eap now is quite a bummer.

@gromit: Thanks for updating this package.

I have noticed that you have added

provides=("rider") conflicts=("rider")

Now I cannot install both rider and rider-eap in parallel any more, which used to work fine previously. Is there a specific reason for this? If not, could you remove these two lines again, please?