Let me state something for anybody reading. Although I am unpacking the appimage file here, the binary will still use the libraries from the appimage. That means, while not in appimage format, it is still using the pre-built and preferred libraries that it came with.

@lunainvictum Do not flag this package-out-of-date because of latest-rolling release.

Can you please add "$@" to the shell script so that it passes arguments to AppRun and so on to the application proper? Thank you :)

@DUCKYWFC

I am not packaging the latest release, I am packaging the stable release points.

Let me state something for anybody reading. Although I am unpacking the appimage file here, the binary will still use the libraries from the appimage. That means, while not in appimage format, it is still using the pre-built and preferred libraries that it came with.

I have updated the package no reason to delete this as this does not violate any licenses :). And, is the official upstream binary :)

Also, I am not distributing any modified versions of the appimage, and with the CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0, changing the format (from an archived appimage to loose files) isn't restricted by the license anyways. So, whoever (probably) sent a deletion request, rest assured, nothing is wrong here.

checksum check fails again :(

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... duckstation-qt-0.1.r8299.AppImage ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! error: failed to download sources for 'duckstation-qt-bin-0.1.r8299-1'

the sha256sums is not valid, so the package can't be installed...

This doesn't look like a squashfs image.
Failed to open squashfs image
==> ERRORE: Si è verificato un errore in package().