惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

腾讯CDC
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - Franky
博客园_首页
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
IT之家
IT之家
The Cloudflare Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
罗磊的独立博客
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
V
V2EX
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
D
Docker
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
B
Blog RSS Feed
C
Check Point Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 聂微东
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网

Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"

GitHub - lechmazur/position_bias: A benchmark for testing whether LLM judges keep the same preference when two lightly edited versions of the same story are shown in opposite orders. Flex routing (EU and EFTA) Dark Factories: Retooling for LLM Velocity Ask HN: What would be the impact of a LLM output injection attack? GitHub - Oaklight/llm-rosetta: Production-ready LLM API translation layer for Python — bidirectional conversion between OpenAI, Anthropic & Google formats via hub-and-spoke IR. Optional API gateway. Streaming & non-streaming. Zero core deps. Contributions welcome! GitHub - browser-use/browser-harness: Self-healing browser harness that enables LLMs to complete any task. GitHub - moeen-mahmud/remen: Remen turns thoughts into something you can return to Analyzing 156 LLM Launch Posts on Hacker News ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: The Best LLM Subscription You Should Buy GitHub - salaamalykum/quran-semantic-search: High-density RAG Semantic Search Engine & Quran Corpus (GEO/SEO Architecture) GitHub - NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM: TensorRT LLM provides users with an easy-to-use Python API to define Large Language Models (LLMs) and supports state-of-the-art optimizations to perform inference efficiently on NVIDIA GPUs. TensorRT LLM also contains components to create Python and C++ runtimes that orchestrate the inference execution in a performant way. The State of LLM Bug Bounties in 2026 Operational Readiness Criteria for Tool-Using LLM Agents Meshcore: Architecture for a Decentralized P2P LLM Inference Network How an LLM becomes more coherent as we train it GitHub - seetrex-ai/laimark GitHub - Jossifresben/BibCrit: AI-assited biblical textual criticism GitHub - wastedcode/memex: File system based wiki, maintained by Claude 99helpers.com GitHub - cliver-project/AITrigram GitHub - unbody-io/adapt: A self-evolving memory layer for AI agents. GitHub - hb20007/awesome-gen-ai-fails: A list of incidents where reliance on generative AI and LLMs resulted in harm to companies, individuals, or society GitHub - nevenkordic/localmind: Run any local LLM with persistent memory and context. CLI agent over Ollama with SQLite-backed hybrid recall. No cloud. Ask HN: What are the machine requirements for a LLM like Llama-3.1-8B? Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlo grpo explained: group relative policy optimization for llm finetuning - cgft Stop comparing price per million tokens: the hidden LLM API costs · TensorZero Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki Is a Bad Idea GitHub - GG-QandV/mnemostroma: Offline RAM-first cognitive leer/coprocessor for AI agents and robotics. Solves "Context Abandonment" with 20-80ms latency using a dual-thread biomimetic memory architecture (ONNX + SQLite WAL). mempalace/agent at agent · skorotkiewicz/mempalace
GitHub - Jwrede/tokentoll: Catch LLM cost changes in code...
Jwrede · 2026-05-05 · via Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"

Prevent LLM cost regressions before production.

CI PyPI version GitHub Marketplace License: MIT Python 3.10+ tokentoll MCP server

tokentoll is a CI gate for LLM cost. It statically analyzes Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript for LLM API calls, scores every pull request against a policy you control, and posts a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict directly on the PR. Optionally, it fails the workflow when the policy is violated, so cost regressions cannot be merged.

tokentoll demo

Live demo

Jwrede/tokentoll-demo is a small polyglot LLM app (Python + TypeScript) wired up to the tokentoll cost gate. Two PRs are already open against it:

Open each PR's conversation tab to see the verdict comment tokentoll actually posts.

The verdict comment

When a PR violates your policy, tokentoll comments with a verdict and a blocking-findings list, then exits non-zero so the check fails. Example:

## tokentoll verdict: FAIL

**Blocking findings (2):**

- `src/agent.py:42` - per-call cost grew 15.0x (threshold 5x)
- total monthly delta +$812.00 exceeds budget $250.00

> Required action: revert the regression, raise the threshold in `.tokentoll.yml`, or add an exemption.

When the PR is clean, the verdict is PASS and the comment shows only the cost delta table. When no policy is configured, tokentoll posts an informational delta comment with no verdict.

Quick start (60 seconds)

Add .github/workflows/tokentoll.yml:

name: tokentoll
on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - "**.py"
      - "**.ts"
      - "**.tsx"
      - "**.js"
      - "**.jsx"

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  cost-gate:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0
      - uses: Jwrede/tokentoll@v0.7.0
        with:
          fail-on-policy-violation: true

Then add .tokentoll.yml to your repo root:

budgets:
  max_monthly_delta_usd: 250
  max_callsite_monthly_usd: 100
  max_relative_increase: 5.0

policies:
  block_unknown_models: true
  fail_on_policy_violation: true

Future PRs receive a verdict comment. PRs that exceed the thresholds fail the workflow.

For SHA-pinned installs and minimal-permissions setups, see docs/github-action.md. For the full policy schema, see docs/policy.md. For the security posture, see docs/security.md.

What it detects

Python

SDK Patterns
OpenAI chat.completions.create, responses.create
Anthropic messages.create, messages.stream
Google GenAI models.generate_content
LiteLLM completion, acompletion
LangChain ChatOpenAI, ChatAnthropic, init_chat_model
Zhipu AI ZhipuAiClient, ZhipuAI (GLM models)

JavaScript / TypeScript (parsed via tree-sitter, handles .js, .jsx, .ts, .tsx)

SDK Patterns
OpenAI Node SDK client.chat.completions.create, client.responses.create, client.embeddings.create
Anthropic SDK client.messages.create, client.messages.stream
Vercel AI SDK generateText, streamText, generateObject, streamObject, embed, embedMany
LangChain.js new ChatOpenAI, new ChatAnthropic, new ChatGoogleGenerativeAI, ...
OpenAI-compatible same shape as OpenAI Node SDK, picked up automatically

Policy rules

The policy block in .tokentoll.yml controls when a PR fails:

Rule Trigger
budgets.max_monthly_delta_usd total estimated monthly delta exceeds the threshold
budgets.max_callsite_monthly_usd any new or changed call site exceeds the threshold
budgets.max_relative_increase per-call cost for any modified call site grows by more than this multiplier
policies.block_unknown_models any new or modified call site uses an unpriced or unresolved model
policies.fail_on_policy_violation tokentoll diff exits 1 on FAIL (CI gate behavior)

Each rule is independent. Leave a field unset to disable that rule. Full reference in docs/policy.md.

CLI

pip install tokentoll

# Scan current directory for LLM API calls and their costs
tokentoll scan .

# Show cost impact of your last commit
tokentoll diff HEAD~1

# Compare two refs and fail on policy violation
tokentoll diff main..HEAD --fail-on-policy-violation

Subcommands:

tokentoll scan [PATH...] [--format table|json|markdown] [--calls-per-month N] [--config PATH]
tokentoll diff [REF] [--base REF] [--head REF] [--format table|json|markdown|github-comment]
               [--config PATH] [--fail-on-policy-violation]
tokentoll update    # refresh bundled pricing data from LiteLLM

Configuration

.tokentoll.yml lives in the repo root and is auto-discovered. Beyond the policy block:

# Per-SDK defaults for dynamic (runtime-resolved) model names
default_models:
  openai: gpt-4o-mini
  anthropic: claude-haiku-3-20240307

# Assumed monthly call volume per call site (used for dollar estimates)
calls_per_month: 5000

# Skip cost estimation for dynamic models entirely.
# Default false: dynamic calls are priced against the per-SDK default.
skip_dynamic_models: false

# Default excludes (tests/, examples/, docs/, cookbook/, benchmarks/, evals/,
# scripts/, notebooks/) are applied automatically. Opt out with:
use_default_excludes: false

# Additional excludes (prefix or glob)
exclude:
  - "*_test.py"
  - vendor/

# Per-path overrides (longest prefix match)
overrides:
  - path: src/agents/
    default_model: gpt-4o
    calls_per_month: 10000
  - path: src/azure/
    skip_dynamic_models: true

Resolution order for dynamic model defaults: default_models (per-SDK) > default_model (generic) > built-in SDK defaults.

Security

tokentoll requires no API keys, sends no telemetry, and runs entirely inside your CI environment. Pricing data ships with the package and updates from LiteLLM on demand. For the recommended permission set, SHA pinning, and fork PR risk, see docs/security.md.

MCP server

tokentoll MCP server

tokentoll ships an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server so Claude Code and other MCP hosts can check the cost impact of LLM code changes from inside an agent conversation:

pip install tokentoll[mcp]
claude mcp add --transport stdio tokentoll -- tokentoll-mcp

Two tools are exposed: scan (estimate costs across a path) and diff (compare two refs). Both return JSON.

How it works

  Source code (.py, .ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx)
        |
        v
  +----------------+   +------------------+
  | AST scanners   |-->| SDK detectors    |
  | ast (Python) + |   | OpenAI, Anthropic|
  | tree-sitter    |   | Google, LiteLLM, |
  | (JS/TS)        |   | LangChain, Zhipu,|
  +----------------+   | Vercel AI SDK    |
                       +------------------+
                              |
                              v
                       +------------------+
                       | Pricing engine   |
                       | 2200+ models     |
                       +------------------+
                              |
                              v
                       +------------------+
                       | Diff engine      |
                       | (old vs new)     |
                       +------------------+
                              |
                              v
                       +------------------+
                       | Policy evaluator |
                       | PASS/WARN/FAIL   |
                       +------------------+
                              |
                              v
                       +------------------+
                       | PR comment / CLI |
                       | output           |
                       +------------------+

A multi-pass constant propagation engine resolves model names through variable assignments, os.getenv() / process.env.X fallbacks, function defaults, class attributes, constructor arguments, dict and object literals, **kwargs unpacking, and Vercel AI SDK provider wrappers (openai("gpt-4o")), so real-world code with indirection still produces useful estimates.

Pricing data

Pricing is bundled and works offline. To refresh from LiteLLM:

tokentoll update

Coverage: 300+ models across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, AWS Bedrock, Azure, and more, plus 2200+ entries from LiteLLM's combined catalog.

Limitations

  • Static analysis only. Models loaded from databases or remote config cannot be resolved; tokentoll falls back to the configured per-SDK default and marks the call site as (default).
  • Token estimates use a characters/4 heuristic unless tiktoken is installed (pip install tokentoll[tiktoken]).
  • Monthly estimates assume uniform call volume per call site. Override per-project with calls_per_month or per-path with overrides.
  • JS/TS resolution is same-file only. Importing a model name from another module produces a dynamic call site rather than a resolved value.

Roadmap

  • v0.9: Public demo repo with a known-failing PR, gpt-researcher case study, expanded adoption section
  • Future: Context-aware call frequency inference (FastAPI routes versus scripts versus loops); cross-file import resolution for JS/TS

License

MIT