惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
腾讯CDC
Vercel News
Vercel News
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
小众软件
小众软件
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
The Cloudflare Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
I
InfoQ
博客园 - 聂微东
Jina AI
Jina AI
J
Java Code Geeks
V
V2EX
U
Unit 42
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
L
LangChain Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
量子位

Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"

GitHub - lechmazur/position_bias: A benchmark for testing whether LLM judges keep the same preference when two lightly edited versions of the same story are shown in opposite orders. Flex routing (EU and EFTA) Dark Factories: Retooling for LLM Velocity Ask HN: What would be the impact of a LLM output injection attack? GitHub - Oaklight/llm-rosetta: Production-ready LLM API translation layer for Python — bidirectional conversion between OpenAI, Anthropic & Google formats via hub-and-spoke IR. Optional API gateway. Streaming & non-streaming. Zero core deps. Contributions welcome! GitHub - browser-use/browser-harness: Self-healing browser harness that enables LLMs to complete any task. GitHub - moeen-mahmud/remen: Remen turns thoughts into something you can return to Analyzing 156 LLM Launch Posts on Hacker News ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: The Best LLM Subscription You Should Buy GitHub - salaamalykum/quran-semantic-search: High-density RAG Semantic Search Engine & Quran Corpus (GEO/SEO Architecture) GitHub - NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM: TensorRT LLM provides users with an easy-to-use Python API to define Large Language Models (LLMs) and supports state-of-the-art optimizations to perform inference efficiently on NVIDIA GPUs. TensorRT LLM also contains components to create Python and C++ runtimes that orchestrate the inference execution in a performant way. The State of LLM Bug Bounties in 2026 Operational Readiness Criteria for Tool-Using LLM Agents Meshcore: Architecture for a Decentralized P2P LLM Inference Network How an LLM becomes more coherent as we train it GitHub - seetrex-ai/laimark GitHub - Jossifresben/BibCrit: AI-assited biblical textual criticism GitHub - wastedcode/memex: File system based wiki, maintained by Claude 99helpers.com GitHub - cliver-project/AITrigram GitHub - unbody-io/adapt: A self-evolving memory layer for AI agents. GitHub - hb20007/awesome-gen-ai-fails: A list of incidents where reliance on generative AI and LLMs resulted in harm to companies, individuals, or society GitHub - nevenkordic/localmind: Run any local LLM with persistent memory and context. CLI agent over Ollama with SQLite-backed hybrid recall. No cloud. Ask HN: What are the machine requirements for a LLM like Llama-3.1-8B? Faster LLM Inference via Sequential Monte Carlo grpo explained: group relative policy optimization for llm finetuning - cgft Stop comparing price per million tokens: the hidden LLM API costs · TensorZero Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki Is a Bad Idea GitHub - GG-QandV/mnemostroma: Offline RAM-first cognitive leer/coprocessor for AI agents and robotics. Solves "Context Abandonment" with 20-80ms latency using a dual-thread biomimetic memory architecture (ONNX + SQLite WAL). mempalace/agent at agent · skorotkiewicz/mempalace
GitHub - Javierlozo/llm-audit: Static analysis for TypeSc...
Javierlozo · 2026-04-29 · via Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"

Static analysis for TypeScript and JavaScript LLM-application code. OWASP LLM Top 10 at commit time. A complement to Semgrep's p/ai-best-practices for the TS/JS ecosystem the upstream pack does not cover.

A focused Semgrep rule pack and CLI for catching the security failure modes that appear in TypeScript and JavaScript code shipped by AI coding assistants (and humans) when integrating LLM features. Runs locally before commits and in CI.

Status: v0 scaffold. Five rules implemented with vulnerable + safe fixtures, all green against npm test. See docs/RULES.md for what's shipped and what's planned, docs/BRIEF.md for the project pitch, docs/AI-FAILURE-MODES.md for the long-form rationale behind each rule, and docs/COMPETITIVE-LANDSCAPE.md for the empirical comparison against p/ai-best-practices and other LLM-security tooling.

Quickstart

You just ran npm i llm-audit. Now what?

# 1. Install the engine (one-time, system-wide).
brew install semgrep        # or: pipx install semgrep

# 2. Sanity-check setup. Lists missing dependencies and how to fix them.
npx llm-audit doctor

# 3. See what the rules catch in 5 seconds. No setup in your repo.
npx llm-audit demo

# 4. Run on your own code.
npx llm-audit scan

That's enough to evaluate whether llm-audit is worth adopting. To make it permanent, see Adopt in your project below.

Machine-readable output (CI, agents, dashboards)

scan supports two structured output formats for non-human consumers:

# Versioned JSON envelope (stable schema, schemaVersion: 1).
# Useful for AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor) and custom dashboards.
npx llm-audit scan --json src > findings.json

# SARIF 2.1.0, the standard for security-tool output.
# Upload directly to GitHub Code Scanning via codeql-action/upload-sarif.
npx llm-audit scan --sarif src > findings.sarif

JSON envelope shape:

scan exits 0 when there are no findings, 1 when there are, regardless of output format.

Using with Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex CLI

llm-audit is built for the exact problem AI coding assistants quietly introduce, so the highest-leverage place to invoke it is from inside the assistant itself. Two integration paths.

1. Install the Claude Code skill (recommended)

Drop a project-local SKILL.md into .claude/skills/llm-audit/ so any agent that reads the universal skill format (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Antigravity, Gemini CLI) picks it up automatically:

npx llm-audit init --skill        # hook + workflow + skill
npx llm-audit init --skill-only   # just the skill

The skill tells the agent when to invoke llm-audit (when editing files that import openai, @anthropic-ai/sdk, ai, @ai-sdk/*, etc.), how to invoke it (npx llm-audit scan --json), and how to interpret each rule's findings with the canonical fix per OWASP entry.

2. Manual rule for users who don't want the skill file

If you'd rather not commit a .claude/skills/ file to your repo, paste this into your agent rules (CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, AGENTS.md, or your tool's equivalent) instead:

Before committing any change that touches LLM-integrated code (imports from openai, @anthropic-ai/sdk, ai, @ai-sdk/*, or any file calling chat.completions.create / messages.create / generateText / streamText), run npx llm-audit scan --json against the changed paths. Treat the findings array as the authoritative list of issues to fix. Each finding has ruleId, owasp, severity, path, startLine, endLine, and message. Fix the code per the message, then re-run until the array is empty. Never bypass the rule by suppressing the finding.

Either path works. The skill is a strict superset (more context for the agent, automatic loading) but requires the file to live in your repo.

The JSON envelope is a stable contract (schemaVersion: 1), so agents can rely on the field names without breaking on a future release.

Versions and updates

llm-audit does not check for updates on every run. No background network calls, no daily cache files, no surprise. The trade-off: you won't be notified of new versions automatically.

To check whether you're current, run:

npx llm-audit doctor

doctor makes one on-demand request to the npm registry and prints either is up to date or is out of date (latest is N.N.N) with the upgrade command. Same network call you'd make manually with npm view llm-audit version, just packaged into the diagnostic.

To upgrade:

npm i llm-audit@latest

Adopt in your project

llm-audit init writes two things: a husky pre-commit hook (local, runs on every commit) and a GitHub Action workflow (CI, runs on PRs and pushes). Before writing the local hook, init asks for confirmation — press Enter to accept the default, type n to skip the hook and keep just the GitHub Action.

npx llm-audit init                     # prompts: Install pre-commit hook? [Y/n]
npx llm-audit init -y                  # skip the prompt, accept default
npx llm-audit init --skill             # also install the Claude Code skill

# If husky isn't already in this project, finish the setup:
npm i -D husky
npm pkg set scripts.prepare='husky'
npm run prepare

Non-interactive callers (CI, scripts, piped stdin) skip the prompt and accept the default automatically — no hangs.

Don't run npx husky init after llm-audit init: it conflicts with the pre-commit file llm-audit init just wrote. The three lines above use husky v9's manual setup, which doesn't have that conflict.

llm-audit init refuses to overwrite existing files; pass --force if you really mean it. Threat model and rationale in docs/SECURITY-AUDIT.md.

Why

The strongest existing rule pack — Semgrep's official p/ai-best-practices — ships 27 rules: 13 Python, 11 generic configs (MCP, Claude Code settings), 3 Bash hook rules, and zero JavaScript or TypeScript rules. Run it against a Next.js + Vercel AI SDK repo and it returns nothing.

The TypeScript / JavaScript LLM-app ecosystem (Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI / Anthropic JS SDKs, Next.js route handlers, Server Actions, AI Gateway) is genuinely underweighted in the static-analysis tooling that exists today. llm-audit fills that gap, with each rule mapped explicitly to an OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications category.

Patterns covered:

  • User input flowing into an LLM system role or prompt template
  • Model output piped into eval, dangerouslySetInnerHTML, or shell
  • JSON.parse on raw model output without a schema validator
  • Hardcoded LLM API keys in source

The full rule list is in docs/RULES.md.

Run rules directly with Semgrep (no install needed)

If you don't want to install the package, the rule pack itself is a plain Semgrep configuration:

semgrep --config node_modules/llm-audit/rules .

Rules in v0

ID OWASP Summary
untrusted-input-in-system-prompt LLM01 User input placed into the LLM system role
untrusted-input-concatenated-into-prompt-template LLM01 User input interpolated into a single-string prompt with no role boundary
llm-output-insecure-handling LLM02 Model output flows into eval, raw HTML, or shell
model-output-parsed-without-schema LLM02 JSON.parse on model output without a schema validator on the path
hardcoded-llm-api-key LLM06 Inline LLM provider API key in source

The full v1 plan and the rationale for each shipped rule is tracked in docs/RULES.md. The long-form "why AI assistants reproduce these patterns" writeup lives in docs/AI-FAILURE-MODES.md.

Project layout

rules/      Semgrep YAML rules, one per file
src/cli.mjs CLI entry: scan, init
templates/  Files installed by `llm-audit init` (husky hook, GH Action)
test/       Vulnerable + safe fixtures per rule
docs/       BRIEF.md (pitch), RULES.md (rule plan)

Author

Built by Luis Javier Lozoya.

License

MIT. See LICENSE.