惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
腾讯CDC
Vercel News
Vercel News
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
小众软件
小众软件
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
The Cloudflare Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
I
InfoQ
博客园 - 聂微东
Jina AI
Jina AI
J
Java Code Geeks
V
V2EX
U
Unit 42
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
L
LangChain Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
量子位

www.infosecurity-magazine.com

Just Three Ransomware Gangs Accounted for 40% of Attacks Last Month Google Chrome Rolls Out Protection Against Infostealers Targeting Session Cookies STX RAT Targets Finance Sector With Advanced Stealth Tactics Bitcoin Depot Reports $3.6m Crypto Theft After System Breach Atomic Stealer MacOS ClickFix Attack Bypasses Apple Security Warnings Middle East Hack-for-Hire Operation Traced to South Asian Cyber Espionage Group Governance Gaps Emerge as AI Agents Drive 76% Increase in NHIs Google Warns of New Threat Group Targeting BPOs and Helpdesks Google API Keys Quietly Gain Access to Gemini on Android Devices Critical Vulnerability in Ninja Forms Exposes WordPress Sites Anthropic Launches Project Glasswing to Use AI to Find and Fix Critical Software Vulnerabilities US Thwarts DNS Hijacking Network Controlled by Russian APT28 Hackers Claude Discovers Apache ActiveMQ Bug Hidden for 13 Years Iran‑Backed Threat Actors Hit US CNI Providers via Internet‑Facing OT Assets Russian APT28 Hackers Hijack Routers to Steal Credentials, UK Security Agency Warns GPU Rowhammer Attack Enables Privilege Escalation and Full System Compromise GrafanaGhost Exploit Bypasses AI Guardrails for Silent Data Exfiltration Over $17bn Lost to Cyber Fraud in the Last Year, Warns FBI Storm-1175 Exploits Flaws in High-Velocity Medusa Attacks Fortinet Releases Emergency Patch After FortiClient EMS Bug Is Exploited New Phishing Platform Used in Credential Theft Campaigns Against C-Suite Execs New 'Storm' Infostealer Remotely Decrypts Stolen Credentials NCSC Issues Security Alert Over Hackers Targeting WhatsApp and Signal Accounts Apple Expands iOS 18 Security Updates Amid DarkSword Threat Researchers Observe Sub-One-Hour Ransomware Attacks GitHub Used as Covert Channel in Multi-Stage Malware Campaign Most CNI Firms Face Up to £5m in Downtime from OT Attacks Google Introduces Android Dev Verification Amid Openness Debate New Venom Stealer MaaS Platform Automates Continuous Data Theft Chinese Hackers Target European Governments in Espionage Campaigns
Most Cybersecurity Staff Don’t Know How Fast They Could S...
Danny Palmer · 2026-03-24 · via www.infosecurity-magazine.com

Over half (56%) of IT and cybersecurity professionals have no idea how quickly they could shut down AI systems affected by a cyber-attack or security incident, new research by ISACA has found.

Published on 23 March by the global certification body, the research is based on a survey of over 3400 security and digital professionals.

Just under a third of respondents (32%) said that they believed they could halt potentially compromised AI systems within an hour, while 7% said they thought it would take over an hour.

Confusion Over Enterprise AI Ownership Raises Security and Governance Risks

Part of the issue stems from confusion over who is responsible for managing enterprise AI applications. A fifth (20%) of survey respondents said they didn’t know who was accountable for AI apps.

Meanwhile, 28% of those surveyed said managing AI was the responsibility of board level executives, 18% said it was the responsibility of the CIO or CTO, while 13% said it is the responsibility to their CISO.

No matter where responsibility lies, under half (43%) of security professionals surveyed said they have high confidence in their organization’s ability to investigate a serious AI incident and explain what happened to leadership or regulators.

Just over a quarter (27%) said they had little to no confidence in their organization’s ability to do so.

According to the ISACA research, many security professionals believe that their organization would struggle to identify a potential security issue related to AI, due to a lack of human oversight of systems.

Only 36% of those surveyed said that humans must approve most AI actions before they happen within their organization. A further 26% said AI activity was only reviewed after the action has taken place.

Meanwhile, 11% said AI actions are only reviewed in the event of specifically flagged activity and 20% said they did not know what role humans played in overseeing decisions made by AI at their organization.

“While organizations may feel the push to adopt AI technology quickly to keep pace and leverage its capabilities, it is imperative they have the proper guardrails and governance in place before doing so,” said Jenai Marinkovic, vCISO and CTO of Tiro Security, co-founder and board chair of GRCIE, and ISACA Emerging Trends Working Group member.

“Enterprises need to ensure the right people, policies, processes, and plans are in place to be able to not only use AI effectively and responsibility, but also to avoid potential major disruption if crisis hits,” she added.