View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We study the limitations of matrix-free algorithms that access a matrix $A$ only through forward matrix-vector products (matvecs) $x \mapsto Ax$, without access to the transpose $A^\top$ or its action. This setting arises naturally in operator learning, inverse problems, and matrix-free PDE solvers, where adjoint evaluations may be unavailable or prohibitively expensive. We show that the lack of transpose access creates severe and sometimes insurmountable theoretical barriers. For Krylov methods, we prove that the sequence of projected operator norms produced by Arnoldi iteration can follow any prescribed nondecreasing curve, showing that forward matvecs alone provide essentially no reliable information about the spectral norm. For several core problems, including least squares, norm estimation, column subset selection, and local maximum volume, we establish non-identifiability results; distinct matrices can generate identical forward-query transcripts while having fundamentally different solutions. We also prove quantitative lower bounds on the number of forward matvecs required for approximation tasks. In particular, any algorithm that computes a near-optimal rank-$k$ approximation must use at least $n$ queries, and estimating the Frobenius norm to relative accuracy $\eps$ requires $\Omega(\eps^{-2})$ queries when $n$ is sufficiently large, matching the complexity of Hutchinson-type estimators up to constants. Although some problems remain solvable without transpose access, the transpose-free setting is fundamentally more limited in both identifiability and efficiency.

Submission history

From: Diana Halikias [view email]
[v1] Sun, 31 May 2026 16:38:43 UTC (93 KB)