惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

小众软件
小众软件
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
月光博客
月光博客
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园_首页
The Cloudflare Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
雷峰网
雷峰网
量子位
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
IT之家
IT之家
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
GbyAI
GbyAI
V
Visual Studio Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler

math updates on arXiv.org

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization Non-normal spectral signatures of instability in neural network training dynamics Optimization of randomized neural networks for transfer operator approximation Selective Ambulance Dispatch Under Contextual Travel-Time Uncertainty LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics Neural Flow Operators can Approximate any Operator: Abstract Frameworks and Universal Approximations LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws On the Stability of Spherical Hellinger-Kantorovich Flows and Their Implications for Differential Privacy Training-Free Looped Transformers Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizer Entrywise Error Bounds for Spectral Ranking with Semi-Random Adversaries Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models? RA-DCA: A Randomized Active-Set DCA for Directional Stationarity in Max-Structured DC Programs Commutator-Induced Uncertainty in VAEs Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget Entropy Equivalence Testing Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation Any-Dimensional Invariant Universality Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization Diffusion-based Denoising Beats Vanilla Score Matching in Parameter Estimation: A Theoretical Explanation Resilience Characterization of AI-Native Wireless Receivers via Persistent Homology The General Theory of Localization Methods Group-Algebraic Tensors: Provably-optimal Equivariant Learning and Physical Symmetry Discovery General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions PilotWiMAE: Pilot-Native Representation Learning for Wireless Channels Proximal basin hopping: global optimization with guarantees
Exact determinant formulas for coalescing particle systems
[Submitted on 11 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 8 Jul 2026 (this ve · 2026-02-11 · via math updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:When particles on a line collide, they may coalesce into one. Such systems arise in the voter model, where boundaries between opinion clusters perform coalescing random walks, and in reaction-diffusion theory, where diffusing particles merge on contact. Computing exact coalescence probabilities has been difficult because collisions reduce the particle count, while classical determinantal methods require a fixed number of particles throughout. We introduce ghost particles: when two particles collide, one survivor continues as usual and one invisible ghost is created alongside it, preserving the total count. This restores the square matrix structure needed for a determinantal formula. We prove that the probability of any specified coalescence pattern - which initial particles merge into which survivors - is given by a determinant whose entries are transition probabilities. Integrating out ghost positions yields a closed-form formula for the surviving particles alone: the coalescence determinant. The only assumptions are the Markov property and nearest-neighbor transitions, so the results apply wherever the classical non-colliding theory does: discrete lattice paths, birth-death chains, and continuous diffusions including Brownian motion.

Submission history

From: Piotr Śniady [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Feb 2026 12:16:16 UTC (47 KB)
[v2] Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:48:28 UTC (47 KB)
[v3] Wed, 8 Jul 2026 16:21:03 UTC (81 KB)