惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

F
Fortinet All Blogs
罗磊的独立博客
IT之家
IT之家
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园_首页
爱范儿
爱范儿
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
G
Google Developers Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
小众软件
小众软件
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
腾讯CDC
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
The Cloudflare Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta

math updates on arXiv.org

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization Non-normal spectral signatures of instability in neural network training dynamics Optimization of randomized neural networks for transfer operator approximation Selective Ambulance Dispatch Under Contextual Travel-Time Uncertainty LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics Neural Flow Operators can Approximate any Operator: Abstract Frameworks and Universal Approximations LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws On the Stability of Spherical Hellinger-Kantorovich Flows and Their Implications for Differential Privacy Training-Free Looped Transformers Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizer Entrywise Error Bounds for Spectral Ranking with Semi-Random Adversaries Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models? RA-DCA: A Randomized Active-Set DCA for Directional Stationarity in Max-Structured DC Programs Commutator-Induced Uncertainty in VAEs Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget Entropy Equivalence Testing Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation Any-Dimensional Invariant Universality Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization Diffusion-based Denoising Beats Vanilla Score Matching in Parameter Estimation: A Theoretical Explanation Resilience Characterization of AI-Native Wireless Receivers via Persistent Homology The General Theory of Localization Methods Group-Algebraic Tensors: Provably-optimal Equivariant Learning and Physical Symmetry Discovery General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions PilotWiMAE: Pilot-Native Representation Learning for Wireless Channels Proximal basin hopping: global optimization with guarantees
Records, drift, and the longest increasing subsequence of...
J. Ricardo G. Mendonça · 2026-05-28 · via math updates on arXiv.org

The longest increasing subsequence (LIS) of a random walk has been studied mainly for zero-mean, symmetric step increments. We numerically investigate the LIS of biased Gaussian random walks, with unit-variance increments and positive drift $μ_{p} = Φ^{-1}(p)$, where $p = P(ξ>0)$. In contrast with the symmetric case, we find that for every fixed $p>1/2$ the mean LIS length grows linearly, $\langle L_{n}(p)\rangle \sim a(p)n$, with $a(p)$ increasing from $0$ at $p=1/2$ to $1$ as $p \to 1$. The record count is also linear, with coefficient $λ(p)$ fixed by Spitzer's formula for the ascending ladder epoch, and the LIS becomes increasingly aligned with this record skeleton as $p$ grows. At the symmetric point $p=1/2$, the record skeleton collapses to the Sparre Andersen $\sqrt{n}$ scale, while the LIS returns to the finite-variance $\sqrt{n}\log{n}$ regime. Near this limit the record rate has the closed-form small-drift slope $λ(μ_{p}) \simeq \sqrt{2}\,μ_{p}$, whereas the excess $a(μ_{p})-λ(μ_{p})$ vanishes more slowly than linearly in the drift, although our data do not resolve a single power law. The empirical distribution of $L_{n}$ also changes across this point, from lognormal-like at $p=1/2$ to Gaussian-like for every sampled $p>1/2$.