惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
A
About on SuperTechFans
小众软件
小众软件
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - Franky
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
罗磊的独立博客
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
GbyAI
GbyAI
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
B
Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

math updates on arXiv.org

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization Non-normal spectral signatures of instability in neural network training dynamics Optimization of randomized neural networks for transfer operator approximation Selective Ambulance Dispatch Under Contextual Travel-Time Uncertainty LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics Neural Flow Operators can Approximate any Operator: Abstract Frameworks and Universal Approximations LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws On the Stability of Spherical Hellinger-Kantorovich Flows and Their Implications for Differential Privacy Training-Free Looped Transformers Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizer Entrywise Error Bounds for Spectral Ranking with Semi-Random Adversaries Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models? RA-DCA: A Randomized Active-Set DCA for Directional Stationarity in Max-Structured DC Programs Commutator-Induced Uncertainty in VAEs Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget Entropy Equivalence Testing Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation Any-Dimensional Invariant Universality Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization Diffusion-based Denoising Beats Vanilla Score Matching in Parameter Estimation: A Theoretical Explanation Resilience Characterization of AI-Native Wireless Receivers via Persistent Homology The General Theory of Localization Methods Group-Algebraic Tensors: Provably-optimal Equivariant Learning and Physical Symmetry Discovery General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions PilotWiMAE: Pilot-Native Representation Learning for Wireless Channels Proximal basin hopping: global optimization with guarantees
Tiny Recursive Models for Solving the J2-Perturbed Lamber...
[Submitted on 30 May 2026] · 2026-06-02 · via math updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:This paper presents a fast, recursive neural solver for the J2-perturbed Lambert problem based on Tiny Recursive Models (TRM), termed the TRM-Perturbed Lambert (TRM-PL) model. TRM is a weight-shared architecture whose effective capacity emerges from iteration depth rather than parameter count: a compact reasoning module is applied repeatedly within a two-level latent hierarchy, refining a candidate departure velocity by simulating the J2 trajectory and correcting it from the resulting tracking error. This unifies initial-guess generation and iterative correction in a single, end-to-end differentiable architecture. The recursive refinement loop is a learned alternative to the homotopy and continuation schemes of classical perturbed-Lambert solvers: rather than following a hand-designed path from the Keplerian to the perturbed solution, the network learns its own sequence of corrections. We evaluate TRM-PL on three test cases of increasing difficulty: single-revolution low-Earth-orbit (LEO) transfers, multi-revolution LEO transfers, and multi-revolution Jovian transfers. Three training paradigms are compared: jointly learning the Lambert solution and the J2 correction; refining the Lambert initial velocity with target-position and J2-corrected velocity supervision; and refining it with target-position supervision alone. Across all cases, the refinement-only approaches are the most reliable. The position-supervised variant reduces the median terminal-position error from 21.7 km to 0.027 km on single-revolution LEO, from 340.9 km to 0.31 km on multi-revolution LEO, all with the same 2.3M-parameter architecture. A single Newton corrector iteration on the TRM-PL output tightens the Jovian median to 0.063 km, yielding compact models accurate enough for embedded deployment.

Submission history

From: Minduli Wijayatunga [view email]
[v1] Sat, 30 May 2026 21:17:00 UTC (6,705 KB)