Blind recognition of polar-coded transmissions is an important task in non-cooperative wireless forensics and security-oriented signal analysis. When the code length is known or has been estimated, recovering the frozen/information bit-position pattern is a key step in identifying the underlying polar-code structure and enabling subsequent information recovery from intercepted observations. In this paper, blind recognition of polar codes is investigated from a hypothesis-testing perspective under the successive cancellation (SC)-based synthetic bit-channel representation. First, under an ideal SC-consistent condition, we formulate position-wise recognition as a binary hypothesis test between frozen-position and information-position models, which provides a theoretical benchmark for analyzing their intrinsic distinguishability. Second, we show that the adopted soft recognition metric admits an exact shifted log-likelihood-ratio interpretation. This justifies ln 2 as the neutral threshold under equal priors and costs, while unequal priors or costs lead to the corresponding Bayesian threshold shift. Third, under the ideal SC-consistent model and this neutral setting, we derive upper and lower bounds on the position-wise and sequence-level recognition error probabilities with multiple independent observations. The resulting overlap coefficient is further related to the classical Bhattacharyya parameter, establishing an interpretable link between blind-recognition difficulty and polar synthetic-channel reliability. Simulation results show that the derived bounds characterize the recognition performance under the ideal SC-consistent model and capture the effects of code length, the number of intercepted observations, and SNR. Further paired comparisons in the tested settings indicate that the SC-consistent recursion provides a good sequence-level match to the realistic SC-recursive procedure.