


























Abstract:Group sequential designs drive innovation in clinical, industrial, and corporate settings. Early stopping for failure in sequential designs conserves experimental resources, whereas early stopping for success accelerates access to improved interventions. Bayesian decision procedures provide a formal and intuitive framework for early stopping using posterior and posterior predictive probabilities. Design parameters including decision thresholds and sample sizes are chosen to control the error probabilities associated with the sequential decision process. These choices are routinely made based on estimating the sampling distribution of posterior summaries via intensive Monte Carlo simulations for each sample size and design scenario considered. In this paper, we propose an efficient method to calibrate decision thresholds to pre-specified alpha- and beta-spending functions and determine minimum sample sizes for Bayesian group sequential designs. We prove theoretical results that enable posterior and posterior predictive probabilities to be modeled as a function of the sample size. Using these functions, we assess error probabilities at a range of sample sizes given simulations conducted at only two sample sizes. The effectiveness of our methodology is highlighted using several substantive examples.
From: Luke Hagar [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:45:49 UTC (65 KB)
[v2]
Wed, 30 Jul 2025 15:45:12 UTC (187 KB)
[v3]
Wed, 26 Nov 2025 04:43:13 UTC (187 KB)
[v4]
Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:26:12 UTC (86 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。