惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 【当耐特】
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
月光博客
月光博客
博客园_首页
博客园 - 叶小钗
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
I
InfoQ
量子位
小众软件
小众软件
爱范儿
爱范儿
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
IT之家
IT之家
Jina AI
Jina AI
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
G
Google Developers Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
J
Java Code Geeks
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报

stat updates on arXiv.org

Simultaneous Monitoring of Shape and Surface Color via 4D Point Clouds: A Registration-free Approach A Refined Generalization Analysis for Extreme Multi-class Supervised Contrastive Representation Learning Ensemble Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimisation The Proxy Presumption: From Semantic Embeddings to Valid Social Measures Modulated learning for private and distributed regression with just a single sample per client device Query-efficient model evaluation using cached responses Functional-prior-based approaches to Bayesian PDE-constrained inversion using physics-informed neural networks Optimal Experiments for Partial Causal Effect Identification Order-Agnostic Autoregressive Modelling with Missing Data Grokking or Glitching? How Low-Precision Drives Slingshot Loss Spikes Tuning Derivatives for Causal Fairness in Machine Learning Spherical Flows for Sampling Categorical Data Bayesian Rain Field Reconstruction using Commercial Microwave Links and Diffusion Model Priors GRALIS: A Unified Canonical Framework for Linear Attribution Methods via Riesz Representation Sharp Capacity Thresholds in Linear Associative Memory: From Winner-Take-All to Listwise Retrieval Unified Framework of Distributional Regret in Multi-Armed Bandits and Reinforcement Learning Jacobian-Velocity Bounds for Deployment Risk Under Covariate Drift Self-Attention as Transport: Limits of Symmetric Spectral Diagnostics Perturbation is All You Need for Extrapolating Language Models Adapt or Forget: Provable Tradeoffs Between Adam and SGD in Nonstationary Optimization Realizable Bayes-Consistency for General Metric Losses Graph Convolutional Support Vector Regression for Robust Spatiotemporal Forecasting of Urban Air Pollution Segmenting Human-LLM Co-authored Text via Change Point Detection Stochastic Schrödinger Diffusion Models for Pure-State Ensemble Generation Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Latent Distribution Matching The Geometric Mechanics of Contrastive Representation Learning: Alignment Potentials, Entropic Dispersion, and Cross-modal Divergence Imbalanced Classification under Capacity Constraints On the Spectral Structure and Objective Equivalence of Orthogonal Multilabel Fisher Discriminants Partially Observed Structural Causal Models First-Order Efficiency for Probabilistic Value Estimation via A Statistical Viewpoint
Bias-Aware Confidence Intervals for Synthetic Control via...
[Submitted on 22 Jun 2026] · 2026-06-24 · via stat updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Synthetic control (SC) methods are among the most widely used tools for causal inference without randomization. The standard Gaussian confidence interval around the estimated effect is simple, fast, and reliably directional when the treatment signal is strong, so practitioners default to it for good reason. Most treated populations, however, are bottom-heavy in intensity, and for them the SC model's systematic bias rivals or exceeds the signal even under good pre-treatment fit. Because this bias shares sign across units it does not average out, and the Gaussian confidence interval shrinks past it and converges on a wrong center. The failure is not imprecision but misdirection: a positive effect estimated as negligible is a missed opportunity, while a negligible effect estimated as significantly positive leads to continued investment in an intervention that is not working. No existing confidence interval for the SC effect measures this bias. We propose a placebo-in-time bootstrap that estimates the bias distribution directly from the observed panel. For each treated unit the procedure backdates the treatment onset and refits the SC model at each placebo onset; the resulting placebo gaps are draws from the same bias distribution that contaminates the real estimate, and bootstrapping them yields a critical value calibrated at the zero null. Because the method resamples realized model error rather than a hypothesized effect, coverage is trajectory-agnostic: it holds at fixed width regardless of how the true effect evolves over time.

Submission history

From: Song Wei [view email]
[v1] Mon, 22 Jun 2026 18:49:03 UTC (168 KB)