Relational Event Models (REMs) provide a rigorous framework for analyzing dyadic interactions observed in continuous time, capturing history-dependent dynamics such as triadic closure and reciprocity. Framing REMs through the lens of counting processes embeds the model in a rich theoretical foundation, facilitating its mathematical analysis. While Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) is standard practice for estimating these models, the underlying statistical guarantees rely on specific asymptotic regimes, namely, whether the network size (n), the observational period (T), or both approach infinity. We review the theoretical foundations of such counting-process-based models, formalizing the core assumptions required to achieve asymptotic normality across these different limits. With a specific focus on Cox-type multiplicative models, we detail the circumstances under which these assumptions hold. Supported by simulation studies, we illustrate how structural modeling choices, including temporal windowing and logarithmic transformations, affect empirical coverage and estimator convergence. We thereby derive several guiding principles for specifying such models in realistic contexts, bridging theory and practice.