惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
博客园 - 【当耐特】
量子位
博客园 - 司徒正美
爱范儿
爱范儿
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
Jina AI
Jina AI
J
Java Code Geeks
腾讯CDC
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
V
Visual Studio Blog
I
InfoQ
D
Docker
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - Franky
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
G
Google Developers Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
H
Help Net Security

stat updates on arXiv.org

Simultaneous Monitoring of Shape and Surface Color via 4D Point Clouds: A Registration-free Approach A Refined Generalization Analysis for Extreme Multi-class Supervised Contrastive Representation Learning Ensemble Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimisation The Proxy Presumption: From Semantic Embeddings to Valid Social Measures Modulated learning for private and distributed regression with just a single sample per client device Query-efficient model evaluation using cached responses Functional-prior-based approaches to Bayesian PDE-constrained inversion using physics-informed neural networks Optimal Experiments for Partial Causal Effect Identification Order-Agnostic Autoregressive Modelling with Missing Data Grokking or Glitching? How Low-Precision Drives Slingshot Loss Spikes Tuning Derivatives for Causal Fairness in Machine Learning Spherical Flows for Sampling Categorical Data Bayesian Rain Field Reconstruction using Commercial Microwave Links and Diffusion Model Priors GRALIS: A Unified Canonical Framework for Linear Attribution Methods via Riesz Representation Sharp Capacity Thresholds in Linear Associative Memory: From Winner-Take-All to Listwise Retrieval Unified Framework of Distributional Regret in Multi-Armed Bandits and Reinforcement Learning Jacobian-Velocity Bounds for Deployment Risk Under Covariate Drift Self-Attention as Transport: Limits of Symmetric Spectral Diagnostics Perturbation is All You Need for Extrapolating Language Models Adapt or Forget: Provable Tradeoffs Between Adam and SGD in Nonstationary Optimization Realizable Bayes-Consistency for General Metric Losses Graph Convolutional Support Vector Regression for Robust Spatiotemporal Forecasting of Urban Air Pollution Segmenting Human-LLM Co-authored Text via Change Point Detection Stochastic Schrödinger Diffusion Models for Pure-State Ensemble Generation Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Latent Distribution Matching The Geometric Mechanics of Contrastive Representation Learning: Alignment Potentials, Entropic Dispersion, and Cross-modal Divergence Imbalanced Classification under Capacity Constraints On the Spectral Structure and Objective Equivalence of Orthogonal Multilabel Fisher Discriminants Partially Observed Structural Causal Models First-Order Efficiency for Probabilistic Value Estimation via A Statistical Viewpoint
The frame problem in quantitative practice: ontological u...
William Faur · 2026-05-25 · via stat updates on arXiv.org

View PDF

Abstract:Quantitative practice across statistics, engineering, and machine learning has been transformed by the automation of inference. Predictions are produced, validated, and deployed at scale and speed that human-mediated reasoning could not match. This shift intersects with a structural limit of reasoning that no methodological refinement dissolves: every inference rests on a finite specification of conditions, and what falls outside the specification does not appear as a widened uncertainty band -it does not appear at all. The choice of specification -the frame -is upstream of the inference and cannot be audited from inside the system that uses it. This paper offers a synthetic, application-oriented review. We argue that three categories of uncertainty operate in quantitative practice -aleatory, epistemic, and frame (or ontological) -and that the third, the residue of finite specification, is structurally invisible to formal analysis within the chosen frame and is the locus of most consequential failures. We trace why the limit applies equally to deductive and inductive reasoning, why no meta-level procedure dissolves the regress, and why current conditions of automated inference make epistemic humility -the practical disposition this argument supports -more, not less, important. We articulate the argument's specific resonances for five typical figures of contemporary quantitative work -the engineer, the statistician, the mathematician, the machine-learning practitioner, and the non-specialist recipient of expert claims -showing how the structural argument bears on each practice's natural defenses. The argument is not against rigor or against quantification; it is for distinguishing rigor earned within a frame from rigor with respect to the frame.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.23614 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2605.23614v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23614

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: William FAURIAT [view email] [via CCSD proxy]
[v1] Fri, 22 May 2026 13:21:05 UTC (29 KB)