惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
雷峰网
雷峰网
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 司徒正美
The Cloudflare Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园_首页
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
V
V2EX
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
美团技术团队
博客园 - 【当耐特】
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
爱范儿
爱范儿
月光博客
月光博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏

cs updates on arXiv.org

Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment Agentic Proving for Program Verification MemAudit: Post-hoc Auditing of Poisoned Agent Memory via Causal Attribution and Structural Anomaly Detection OpenSkillEval: Automatically Auditing the Open Skill Ecosystem for LLM Agents One Policy, Infinite NPCs: Persona-Traceable Shared RL Policies for Scalable Game Agents How Human-Like Are Large Language Models? A Register-Aware Linguistic Evaluation Framework Benchmarking Google Embeddings 2 against Open-Source Models for Multilingual Dense Retrieval and RAG Systems Structure-Guided Entity Resolution: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Robust Name Matching in Complex Linguistic Contexts Solving the Aircraft Disassembly Scheduling Problem Co-ReAct: Rubrics as Step-Level Collaborators for ReAct Agents CP or DP? Why Not Both: A Case Study in the Partial Shop Scheduling Problem Asking For An Old Friend: Diagnosing and Mitigating Temporal Failure Modes in LLM-based Statutory Question Answering EDGE-OPD: Internalizing Privileged Context with Evidence Guided On-Policy Distillation ARES: Automated Rubric Synthesis for Scalable LLM Reinforcement Learning SSDAU: Structured Semantic Data Augmentation for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction Naturalistic measure of social norms alignment Articulatory strategy as a source of variation in acoustic vowel dynamics When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems EquiSumm : A Gender Bias-Aware Framework for Inclusive Tweet Summarization Metacognition as Reward: Reinforcing LLM Reasoning via Knowledge and Regulation Signals From Correctness to Preference: A Framework for Personalized Agentic Reinforcement Learning Cultural Adaptation in Large Language Models for Political Discourse Emotion Recognition in Sign Language Conversation ClimateChat-300K: A Multi-Modal Facebook Dataset for Understanding Diverse Perspectives in Climate Communication AraHopeCorpus: Annotation Guidelines and Dataset for Hope Speech in Arabic Social Media Crisis Discourse Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Ventilator Decision Support with Contextual Bandit Preference Learning Convergence Without Understanding: When Language Models Agree on Representations but Disagree on Reasoning DART: Semantic Recoverability for Structured Tool Agents Ontological Knowledge Blocks: Executable Compliance and Profile-Based Validation for Trustworthy AI Systems Parallel Context Compaction for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Serving
What do you mean by human-AI collaboration: Prerequisite ...
[Submitted on 13 Jun 2026] · 2026-06-16 · via cs updates on arXiv.org

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2606.15509 (cs)

[Submitted on 13 Jun 2026]

View PDF

Abstract:The concept of 'collaboration' has been extended rapidly to describe what people now do with conversational agents, intelligent tutors, adaptive platforms, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in general. This chapter asks what is gained and lost when a demanding concept from the learning sciences is applied so freely. Returning to long-standing accounts of collaborative learning, it reconstructs the requirements that a situation, an interaction, and a set of cognitive processes have historically had to meet before being called collaborative. Human-AI collaboration requires a partly symmetric and negotiated relationship, shared and negotiable goals, a low and shifting division of labour, interactive and synchronous exchange, and mutual modelling, grounding, and socially shared regulation. Reviewing process-sensitive empirical studies of writing and problem solving, the chapter shows that most current human-AI interaction is better described as consultation, governance, delegation, or instruction rather than as collaboration. To make these distinctions functional, the chapter introduces a five-level diagnostic taxonomy of human-AI teaming (i.e. transactional, situational, operational, praxical, and synergistic) defined by the affordances an AI system exhibits. It shows that only the highest level begins to satisfy the conditions the tradition places on collaboration. The chapter derives the functions an AI system must possess for collaboration to be achievable, argues that most of these are present-day engineering choices rather than capabilities to be awaited, and sets out the implications for research, measurement, and responsible practice of human-AI collaboration in education.
Comments: 22 pages,1 table, Submitted for Review to the Handbook of AI and the Future of Education (R. Wegerif, I. Casebourne, A. Zhou & I. J. Ness, Eds.)
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.15509 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2606.15509v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15509

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mutlu Cukurova PhD [view email]
[v1] Sat, 13 Jun 2026 23:30:12 UTC (196 KB)

Current browse context:

cs.HC

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Demos

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.