惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园_首页
J
Java Code Geeks
Jina AI
Jina AI
B
Blog RSS Feed
量子位
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
L
LangChain Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 聂微东
月光博客
月光博客
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
I
InfoQ
罗磊的独立博客
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
爱范儿
爱范儿
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
雷峰网
雷峰网

cs updates on arXiv.org

Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment Agentic Proving for Program Verification MemAudit: Post-hoc Auditing of Poisoned Agent Memory via Causal Attribution and Structural Anomaly Detection OpenSkillEval: Automatically Auditing the Open Skill Ecosystem for LLM Agents One Policy, Infinite NPCs: Persona-Traceable Shared RL Policies for Scalable Game Agents How Human-Like Are Large Language Models? A Register-Aware Linguistic Evaluation Framework Benchmarking Google Embeddings 2 against Open-Source Models for Multilingual Dense Retrieval and RAG Systems Structure-Guided Entity Resolution: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Robust Name Matching in Complex Linguistic Contexts Solving the Aircraft Disassembly Scheduling Problem Co-ReAct: Rubrics as Step-Level Collaborators for ReAct Agents CP or DP? Why Not Both: A Case Study in the Partial Shop Scheduling Problem Asking For An Old Friend: Diagnosing and Mitigating Temporal Failure Modes in LLM-based Statutory Question Answering EDGE-OPD: Internalizing Privileged Context with Evidence Guided On-Policy Distillation ARES: Automated Rubric Synthesis for Scalable LLM Reinforcement Learning SSDAU: Structured Semantic Data Augmentation for Joint Entity and Relation Extraction Naturalistic measure of social norms alignment Articulatory strategy as a source of variation in acoustic vowel dynamics When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems EquiSumm : A Gender Bias-Aware Framework for Inclusive Tweet Summarization Metacognition as Reward: Reinforcing LLM Reasoning via Knowledge and Regulation Signals From Correctness to Preference: A Framework for Personalized Agentic Reinforcement Learning Cultural Adaptation in Large Language Models for Political Discourse Emotion Recognition in Sign Language Conversation ClimateChat-300K: A Multi-Modal Facebook Dataset for Understanding Diverse Perspectives in Climate Communication AraHopeCorpus: Annotation Guidelines and Dataset for Hope Speech in Arabic Social Media Crisis Discourse Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Ventilator Decision Support with Contextual Bandit Preference Learning Convergence Without Understanding: When Language Models Agree on Representations but Disagree on Reasoning DART: Semantic Recoverability for Structured Tool Agents Ontological Knowledge Blocks: Executable Compliance and Profile-Based Validation for Trustworthy AI Systems Parallel Context Compaction for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Serving
Discovering Lexical Gaps Using Embeddings from Multilingu...
Yoonwon Jung, Aaron S. Cohen, Benjamin K. Bergen · 2026-05-23 · via cs updates on arXiv.org

Lexical gaps are words that do not exist in certain languages. They pose challenges for building multilingual lexical resources, for machine translation, and for cross-lingual transfer. Existing lexical gap detection relies on human judgments or fixed conceptual taxonomies. We propose a data-driven framework for identifying cross-lingual lexical gaps. We extracted contextualized embeddings from Korean-English bilingual LLMs for Korean-to-English and English-to-Korean translation pairs. Combinations of LLMs, embedding types, dimensionality, and orthogonal transformations across 100 train-test splits yielded 4000 distinct embedding spaces in each source language. In each space, we computed the semantic similarity between each source word and its nearest neighbor in the target language, and compared their distribution for gap words versus non-gap words. In 94% (Korean-to-English) and 97% (English-to-Korean) of embedding spaces, gap words showed weaker cross-lingual semantic alignment than non-gap words. Logistic classifiers trained on unaligned embedding spaces can reliably separate gap words from non-gap words, achieving AUCs of 0.81 (Korean-to-English) and 0.76 (English-to-Korean) and retrieving 18/19 Korean and 26/27 English gap words. This approach provides a language-agnostic and taxonomy-free method for scalable lexical gap identification.