




















Abstract:Export control is a policy and legal tool to protect national interests by regulating exports of sensitive goods and technology to foreign nations. It has become central to U.S.-China tech rivalry, especially in AI. Controls cover advanced chips, capital, personnel, and critical minerals for semiconductors. Since October 2022, the U.S. BIS has progressively tightened restrictions on advanced computing components to China. China responded with export curbs on critical minerals and filed a WTO complaint against the U.S. under GATT. This article argues that while export controls are strategic in U.S.-China AI competition, their long-term effectiveness is questionable. They often unintentionally boost China's self-reliance and R&D. Moreover, overly strict or arbitrary controls may violate WTO obligations, complicating dispute resolution and hindering AI progress. The study further examines legal implications of overusing export controls. It advocate for a restrained interpretation of security interests, arguing that commercial or dual-use AI models and semiconductors do not meet the security exception criteria under GATT Article XXI(b).
| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.23475 [cs.CY] |
| (or arXiv:2605.23475v1 [cs.CY] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23475 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
|
| Journal reference: | Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Vol. 85 (2026) |
From: Jyh-An Lee [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 22 May 2026 10:36:36 UTC (928 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。